Can I just make an observation?

[Daisy]

and how does one do that anyway?

 

[Daisy]

Nevermind, here it is:
http://www.lpsg.org/152621-how-to-put-a-user.html

 

[thetramp]

@ seaside, click CP and then edit ignore list under settings and options, if you need further assistance i am sure there is a guide in the faq section, i also am happy to help, so feel free to ask tho i am quite sure you will manage. I just hope i do not land on your ignore list, tho i am sometimes are guilty of going off topic.

@goldmne, don't straight guys have the same right to have fun in that thread and hope for nice answers as any other person here? And isn't it their right to answer in a truthful way and say no to men as long as they do it in a polite and respectful way?
I don't think anyone goes there just to say no, they enjoy the thread just like you, but to do that it is needed to post.

 

[D_Tim McGnaw]

Are you saying you would have phrased it like that if you were'nt a man of decorum?

More that MB's rapier like mind pierced the meat of the issue at hand more accurately than my ramblings could have. Oh and I love it when people tell other people they're talking out their holes... :biggrin1: Of course the correct retort is "ask me snatch"

 

[B_subgirrl]

So the very reason the site was created is now considered "wank fodder" and ridiculed.

I've only heard that term used with any regularity in Women's Issues, and considering that the point of Women's Issues is NOT to provide wank fodder, it's fair enough. Many of the threads in other sections ARE wank fodder, but that's fine. In those sections there are no rules against wank fodder, and it seems to be what most users want to read there. As such, I am quite happy to berate men for asking for wank fodder in Women's Issues, while providing it for them in other sections.

I agree with you entirely. It is always easier and faster to simply close a thread or ignore it than it is to make a caustic comment.

As for myself, I am interested to know whether penis size, shape, or some other penis characteristic, impacts a woman's ability to orgasm with vaginal intercourse either positively or negatively, or whether it affects their prefered position, etc. It would seem to me the women's issues section would be an appropriate place to discuss such topics.

The problem is that if those threads were allowed in WI, we would spend all day answering cock questions and never get to discuss anything of importance to us (like whether gyn visits make you nervous). If you post in the sticky many of us will be happy to answer you. Or you could post it in Sex With a Large Penis.

There are plenty of threads there to discuss that, it is not like that it ain't possible. There even is a sticky where who is interested can read the opinions of the women on here who were very open about their preferences.
I can see being annoyed by being asked the same thing over and over again by someone who doesn't even care enough to read that sticky.
Tho i do think it sometimes would be better to just stay out and ignore those questions.

Yep, I get annoyed when people can't be bothered reading rules and stickys and don't do a search before posting. Seriously, do these guys think they are the only ones in the world who've ever asked if their 8 inch cock is big enough?

Lord, I'm definitely bad about going off topic. When I get into a thread and we start talking about something interesting and someone brings up something that in some way is linked to the OP I like to continue the conversation.

I'm a shocker for doing this as well, especially if submissivegirl is around! It's really not a terribly polite thing to do, however I do think those off topic conversations lead to a lot of new friendships and that can't be a bad thing.

I started a thread regarding one's personal criteria, preferences and limits in terms of sexual partners and the things one might or mightn't do (gotta tend to that, I've ignored it for a day or two).

Brilliant thread that one. Thanks for beginning it. I've really enjoyed participating in it.

 

[Bbucko]

Brilliant thread that one. Thanks for beginning it. I've really enjoyed participating in it.

I'm taking a short break this minute in weeding through it and responding to different points as they get raised. But your contributions in that thread have been most valuable: thank you very much for all your input and helping to propel the dialog forward.

 

[Daisy]

LOL Bbucko there is quite a difference between your well thought out posts and "fuck you..no fuck you..suck my dick..no you suck MY dick"..THAT is what I call "off topic".

 

[D_Tim McGnaw]

LOL Bbucko there is quite a difference between your well thought out posts and "fuck you..no fuck you..suck my dick..no you suck MY dick"..THAT is what I call "off topic".

Can you post a link to something which resembles the conversation you paraphrased above?

 

[HazelGod]

Can you post a link to something which resembles the conversation you paraphrased above?

Suck my dick. :tongue:

 

[D_Tim McGnaw]

Suck my dick. :tongue:

No you suck MY dick :tongue:

 

[Bbucko]

LOL Bbucko there is quite a difference between your well thought out posts and "fuck you..no fuck you..suck my dick..no you suck MY dick"..THAT is what I call "off topic".

That's why there's a scroll on your mouse, sweetheart. Maybe that's why I go through so many mice and keyboards

 

[Gillette]

seaside - I think you are talking out of your hole.

The site is mostly about cock and sex.

Maybe you should stop following those 10 posters around and getting riled up that everything they post doesn't match your opinion on whatever the topic is. :wink:

If the thread title and the OP ask which of two orgasm types we prefer then the topic of the thread is not a matter of opinion. It has been clearly stated. Challenging the threads validity or the OP's right to ask is off topic and it is those who persist in doing so who need to stop getting riled up whenever a thread topic doesn't match their opinion of how the forum heading should be interpreted.

If she sees a thread titled "Ladies, do you prefer clitoral orgasms or g-spot orgasms?", thinks the topic is interesting enough to enter the thread only to find it's already derailed with people accusing the OP of seeking wank fodder, then it's not a case of her following any ten people. She's attempting to follow a thread. What it is, however, is a case of those certain people being incapable of passing up an opportunity to flame someone.

Unfortunately for those who do find any given topic of interest, having such people on ignore doesn't solve the problem. The OP now has to defend their question plus others not on the ignore list chime in with their thoughts on the validity of the question and, ta-daa, the actual topic of the thread is completely lost in the derailment.

If you don't like the actual thread topic then boycott it with silence.
If you think it should be placed elsewhere then report it to the mods with your suggestion.
If you think the thread is somehow a violation of the ToS report it as such.

If you absolutely must voice your displeasure with the threads existence on the thread and choose to insult the OP for starting it then feel free to do so with the knowledge that you may be reported for thread hijacking and/or flaming.

Lastly, I think she's communicating through her fingers. I can't think of any holes capable of typing.
Although...If Seaside does have prehensile labia then she's about to become the most popular woman on this site.

 

[goldmine]

NO go suck your own dick !!! lmao I don't belong here !

 

[D_Tim McGnaw]

If the thread title and the OP ask which of two orgasm types we prefer then the topic of the thread is not a matter of opinion. It has been clearly stated. Challenging the threads validity or the OP's right to ask is off topic and it is those who persist in doing so who need to stop getting riled up whenever a thread topic doesn't match their opinion of how the forum heading should be interpreted.

If she sees a thread titled "Ladies, do you prefer clitoral orgasms or g-spot orgasms?", thinks the topic is interesting enough to enter the thread only to find it's already derailed with people accusing the OP of seeking wank fodder, then it's not a case of her following any ten people. She's attempting to follow a thread. What it is, however, is a case of those certain people being incapable of passing up an opportunity to flame someone.

Unfortunately for those who do find any given topic of interest, having such people on ignore doesn't solve the problem. The OP now has to defend their question plus others not on the ignore list chime in with their thoughts on the validity of the question and, ta-daa, the actual topic of the thread is completely lost in the derailment.

If you don't like the actual thread topic then boycott it with silence.
If you think it should be placed elsewhere then report it to the mods with your suggestion.
If you think the thread is somehow a violation of the ToS report it as such.

If you absolutely must voice your displeasure with the threads existence on the thread and choose to insult the OP for starting it then feel free to do so with the knowledge that you may be reported for thread hijacking and/or flaming.

Lastly, I think she's communicating through her fingers. I can't think of any holes capable of typing.
Although...If Seaside does have prehensile labia then she's about to become the most popular woman on this site.

Hold on if people should be free to interpret Forum headings as they wish and post whatever they want where ever they want why isn't it fair enough that people ignore the thread title and post whatever they want?

You can't have that one both ways.

 

[B_subgirrl]

I'm taking a short break this minute in weeding through it and responding to different points as they get raised. But your contributions in that thread have been most valuable: thank you very much for all your input and helping to propel the dialog forward.

Thanks :redface:.

 

[Daisy]

If the thread title and the OP ask which of two orgasm types we prefer then the topic of the thread is not a matter of opinion. It has been clearly stated. Challenging the threads validity or the OP's right to ask is off topic and it is those who persist in doing so who need to stop getting riled up whenever a thread topic doesn't match their opinion of how the forum heading should be interpreted.

If she sees a thread titled "Ladies, do you prefer clitoral orgasms or g-spot orgasms?", thinks the topic is interesting enough to enter the thread only to find it's already derailed with people accusing the OP of seeking wank fodder, then it's not a case of her following any ten people. She's attempting to follow a thread. What it is, however, is a case of those certain people being incapable of passing up an opportunity to flame someone.

Unfortunately for those who do find any given topic of interest, having such people on ignore doesn't solve the problem. The OP now has to defend their question plus others not on the ignore list chime in with their thoughts on the validity of the question and, ta-daa, the actual topic of the thread is completely lost in the derailment.

If you don't like the actual thread topic then boycott it with silence.
If you think it should be placed elsewhere then report it to the mods with your suggestion.
If you think the thread is somehow a violation of the ToS report it as such.

If you absolutely must voice your displeasure with the threads existence on the thread and choose to insult the OP for starting it then feel free to do so with the knowledge that you may be reported for thread hijacking and/or flaming.

Lastly, I think she's communicating through her fingers. I can't think of any holes capable of typing.
Although...If Seaside does have prehensile labia then she's about to become the most popular woman on this site.

LOL!! Thank you I really appreciate that you understood what I was trying to say Gillette.

Hilaire, it's not that I couldn't cite conversations of that nature but honestly I really don't want to make this personal and drag names into it, or call out specific people. This was never meant to be a nasty "fuck you people" kind of thread but more along the lines of let's just try to be a little more civil and perhaps stay on the specific thread's topic a little more often.
I am not into conflict and I don't see any glory in being right or wrong on a message board. The people who choose aggression as a method of feeling superior on internet forums probably have something lacking in their "real" lives. (and by the way civility should not be mistaken for weakness)

 

[Daisy]

Hold on if people should be free to interpret Forum headings as they wish and post whatever they want where ever they want why isn't it fair enough that people ignore the thread title and post whatever they want?

You can't have that one both ways.

You're absolutely right and you can indeed take ANY topic and post whatever you want. It's just that it would be nice if you didn't..or didn't on every thread. Or just start a new thread and say whatever you like. What makes the forums interesting however, is the separate topics which one can then read or not read based on the content. While I agree that off topic banter is inevitable, it can very VERY annoying when it goes on for 20 pages. Do you disagree Hilaire?

 

[Gillette]

I've only heard that term used with any regularity in Women's Issues, and considering that the point of Women's Issues is NOT to provide wank fodder, it's fair enough. Many of the threads in other sections ARE wank fodder, but that's fine. In those sections there are no rules against wank fodder, and it seems to be what most users want to read there.

As such, I am quite happy to berate men for asking for wank fodder in Women's Issues, while providing it for them in other sections.

How do you figure Relationships and Jealousy, Clothing and Appearances, Politics or Funny Stuff are for wanking? More to the point how did you arrive at the idea that Women's Issues is an exclusive behaviour section, with rules against becoming aroused no less. Where is that stated?

The problem is that if those threads were allowed in WI, we would spend all day answering cock questions and never get to discuss anything of importance to us (like whether gyn visits make you nervous).

1. Why do you feel compelled to answer all questions asked?
2. How is answering such questions a waste of time if it's in WI but not a waste of time if posted elsewhere? You do say you happy to answer if it's in the "right" section. I'm not seeing the time difference.
3. You use the terms "we" and "us". Who are you, or any other woman, to decide for another what she considers important or response-worthy.

 

[Gillette]

Hold on if people should be free to interpret Forum headings as they wish and post whatever they want where ever they want why isn't it fair enough that people ignore the thread title and post whatever they want?

You can't have that one both ways.

You're being obtuse again.

"Women's Issues" can be interpreted as issues belonging to women or issues pertaining to women. "Which of the following two orgasms do you prefer", can not be interpreted to mean please voice whether or not I'm allowed to ask.

 

[D_Tim McGnaw]

You're absolutely right and you can indeed take ANY topic and post whatever you want. It's just that it would be nice if you didn't..or didn't on every thread. Or just start a new thread and say whatever you like. What makes the forums interesting however, is the separate topics which one can then read or not read based on the content. While I agree that off topic banter is inevitable, it can very VERY annoying when it goes on for 20 pages. Do you disagree Hilaire?

I'm not arguing for total post chaos, Gilette is, what you're saying about posts within a thread applies just as much to threads within a forum. People posting threads which don't relate to the forum's intended purpose is just as uncivil as posting off topic posts in threads. Do you disagree Seaside? :smile: