I am 100% gay. As for the discrimination thing, Funk and BigPoppa should be a lesson to us all: ya gets as ya gives. Funkalicious comes across in his posts as very defensive, right off the bat (not saying you are, Funky sweetie, that's just how you come across.) BigPoppa, on the other hand, comes across as "nothing wrong with it, I'm just not interested." Huge difference. And I would wager that BigPoppa has not once felt "discriminated against," or that anyone was trying to turn him to the dark side. You haven't, have you, BPF?
Admiring, or seeing beauty in, a person or thing does not necessarily equate to sexual attraction. Because I acknowledge that a woman is beautiful, that does not mean I want to have sex with her. I think the Chrysler building in NYC is beautiful, too. Because I don't want to have sex with a woman, that does not mean I hate women. In my mind, I imagine that 100% straight simply means the person has no desire at all to have sex with a same-gender person, just as 100% gay means that there is no desire at all to have sex with a person of the other gender. How someone can stretch "sexual attractions" to also mean "aesthetic appreciation" seems a bit odd to me, and is probably... well, no, I won't even put that in here.
Admiring, or seeing beauty in, a person or thing does not necessarily equate to sexual attraction. Because I acknowledge that a woman is beautiful, that does not mean I want to have sex with her. I think the Chrysler building in NYC is beautiful, too. Because I don't want to have sex with a woman, that does not mean I hate women. In my mind, I imagine that 100% straight simply means the person has no desire at all to have sex with a same-gender person, just as 100% gay means that there is no desire at all to have sex with a person of the other gender. How someone can stretch "sexual attractions" to also mean "aesthetic appreciation" seems a bit odd to me, and is probably... well, no, I won't even put that in here.