Chemical Method?

FuzzyKen

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Posts
2,045
Media
0
Likes
97
Points
193
Gender
Male
I am surprised to see that this thread has appeared on this group. I am the moderator of a yahoo group that is currently researching this and I want to give great caution to anyone contemplating it at this time.

The fellow authoring the patent in Canada and the Patent Award have their medical flaws.

Initially many threads were started on this in multiple locations and the only one that remained was the one at Thunder's. The fellow in that threaed turned on himself and tried to discredit himself at virtually the same time that the patent application was tendered to a very prestigious Washington D.C. Law firm specializing in Patents.

In addition a member of our group was traveling in Canada and interviewed the author of that patent and it was again suspicious in that he started changing his story yet again. It was almost as if he was used as the author as an M.D. to give it weight, but like maybe he was not the author?

Also note that in the case studies that some of the data is repeated exactly between to individuals designated as separate and different individuals.

The theories on this ARE sound and these come from enlargement caused by one of two different kinds of priapism as is most often found with sicle cell anemia. One has to understand that recent information has now differentiated between the dangerous kind of priapism and the one that is in essence harmless.

There is information dating back on the net as far as 1977 that I found, but you will have to dig very hard to find it.

The group membership is at this point closed temporarily to the general public, but is open to those already receiving injection therapy for Erectile Dysfunction. This is very complicated and is NOT a method that should even be tried by anyone not experienced in medical matters. IF it is successful in a small test group the techniques can be taught, but again this is NOT a simple thing and will require a great deal to prevent permanent injury.

Special injection technique is required for doing what is called an intracavernosal injection. The only thing that this has in common with the E.D. therapy is the injection technique. With the patent you do not need a full erection according to the author. The idea is to maintain a partial erection for a long period of time wich maintains the blood flow and prevents damage from lack of oxygenation.

If people are interested I will happily post the results here when there are some to post.

If one is already doing E.D. therapy and is savvy with the techniques then making the adaptations to try this are small. If they are starting from scratch this is dangerous enough to be considered a nuclear holocost as far as potential damage to your penis and future erectile capability.

The drugs used in this vary and these can be plain Caverject, Tri-Mix and Quad Mix. Caverject is a standard prescription, but Tri and Quad which are better must be made up for you by a compounding pharmacy and must be both transported and stored properly under refrigeration.

Using a pneumatic device for the Caverject is possible, but is less effective and a pain in the rear. The needles used for this are hair fine because the medication flows easily and is a very tiny dosage.

PLEASE, if you are interested take the time to have a completed Yahoo Profile and join the Surgical_Enlargement_Forum over there. I Moderate both groups and will post the data at that location as it happens.

I have served as a counselor to many men injured by less than great surgeons and though this method does indeed have medical precedent and possibilities it is as yet unproven theory. NO MORE DAMAGED GENITALS! There have even been men injured by the time honored vacuum pump. This is very probably the most dangerous method ever discussed for penis enlargement in un trained hands.

IF it works well there are a few good MD's who will make it available and that has already been discussed.

Good Luck and please be careful guys,
Ken
 

Ed69

Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2006
Posts
2,890
Media
0
Likes
1,276
Points
258
Location
Oregon (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Thanks for the warning Ken.I'm very happy with the way my willy works,despite the loss of my foreskin and one testicle.No needles or knives will ever come in contact with my package as long as I have anything to say or do about it!
 

dolf250

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Posts
769
Media
0
Likes
26
Points
238
Age
34
Location
The Great White North
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Thanks for “injecting” some sanity to this thread Ken (and pardon the pun.) I couldn't even think of a way to respond to how ludicrous it is to be injecting yourself with untested, unproven chemicals in the hopes of attaining a larger erection. If you were using medical journals as a basis it would still be questionable, but it seemed that most of the information was attained from an Internet forum.

Having never belonged to a “thunder” forum most of us likely looked at this thread and shook our heads. However, if you got twenty people all chiming in what a wonderful idea it is and three who claim to have tried it with good results suddenly writing yourself a prescription and injecting yourself seems sane. Personally, waiting a few years until it has been proven seems like a reasonable course of action if you actually want to try this method of enlargement.

Thanks for (hopefully) stopping this before it got started.
 

RawDog

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Posts
4,415
Media
17
Likes
243
Points
283
Location
Grinding the backstop (in Colorado)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I'm bumping this thread to ask Ken if any new developments have occured in this arena of PE.

Close to three years have passed since Chemical PE seems to have been discredited, any idea if there are any new strategies on the horizon? As you said, the science seems to be sound, and idea why it never worked?