Chris Brown

luvmycock

Admired Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Posts
2,468
Media
1
Likes
866
Points
358
Location
California
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
i dont know, with the mouth covered it could be anyone. the guy does favor Chris but this would have to be early in his career because Chis's arms, chest and I believe back are covered in tattoos. so for now i'm gonna say No.
 

thee1

Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2009
Posts
2,529
Media
0
Likes
1,151
Points
258
Location
East coast
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
If this pic was in 2006 like it says, I think it would be before he was totally inked up. It surely does look a lot like him.
 

powerplaya

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2006
Posts
110
Media
0
Likes
10
Points
238
Location
losangeles
Gender
Male
Im calling bullshit. I believe the only reason the person who posted those pictures said that they were from 2006 was so they could justify this person not having the many tats Chris has. Heres one of many problems though-in 2006 Chris would have been a minor making these pics....Anyway the guy in those pics looks Latino to me. The eyes, the eyebrows,,,it's def not Chris Brown.
 

Great ass too

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2007
Posts
107
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
163
Location
Cambridge
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Im calling bullshit. I believe the only reason the person who posted those pictures said that they were from 2006 was so they could justify this person not having the many tats Chris has. Heres one of many problems though-in 2006 Chris would have been a minor making these pics....Anyway the guy in those pics looks Latino to me. The eyes, the eyebrows,,,it's def not Chris Brown.

2006 is around when they "worked together" on some crappy song.
 

ghostly8383

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Posts
169
Media
0
Likes
24
Points
53
Location
australia
would have to say its a fake.. but its a good one..

the only noticeable thing is the colour of his skin. his black. no amount of light can make a black person that pale?

i mean look at the other guy?
 

Q Vee

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2006
Posts
1,006
Media
2
Likes
63
Points
183
Location
New England, USA
Gender
Male
would have to say its a fake.. but its a good one..

the only noticeable thing is the colour of his skin. his black. no amount of light can make a black person that pale?

i mean look at the other guy?

WHAT? Because of racial mixing, our skin comes in a myriad of colors and hues. Light skinned blacks have passed for white since slavery. Black people of all hues get tanned also.

Also, "photoshopping" is regularly used to darken and lighten a black person's skin color. Whose to say how authentic this photo is?

Please be careful when you generalize about a group of people, especially where race is involved. A lack of understanding could be taken the wrong way and set off a firestorm.

As far as this photo goes, I do not personally find Chris' skin color to be an issue. If Chris was as dark as me, definitely there would be a problem. But he is much lighter and also lighter than the alleged bottom guy, so it all seems good to me. Of course that is providing it is indeed Chris Brown, which is debatable.