Given that I just noticed you were the last post in a DIFFERENT circ thread and looking at your history that is littered with posts in circ threads... Well, son, I think you may well be a little obsessed yourself. And therefore, I would question how unbiased you are towards the whole issue. You're offended that SilverTrain dismisses people who "have a preference on the issue" because that's you. You want to think you have a good reason to care so much about your own foreskin. You don't want to think you have some kind of mental issue for being that way.
I can understand that. But let's not have you pretend that you're speaking from a place of unbiased wisdom.
This is called an argument
ad hominem (attacking the person), and it's considered a fallacy. A foolish or bad (or obsessed) person can say a good thing and it's still a good thing. A sensible or wise person can say a foolish or wrong thing and it's still a foolish or wrong thing.
So far as I can make out, the OP is saying that nobody should say (or think)
anything about circumcision. {EDIT: On re-reading: ...that nobody should say anything serious about circumcision, or at least not complain about being circumcised.} This is very similar to the people who come on circumcision threads and say "there are more important things to talk about" (often after an article about how "circumcision is an important decision for parents").
The reason these threads will never end (in the foreseeable future, ie until infant circumcision does) is that infant male genital cutting is very very peculiar. There is no other normal, healthy, integral, functional, non-renewable part of a baby's body that may be cut off at parental whim.
When an adult chooses to have it done to himself, there is seldom a long thread about it. Either "It turned out well" and "That's good" or "It turned out badly" and "That's bad."
But when it is intergenerational, we have a huge community of men who have had part of their genitals cut off without their consent, and some are outraged, while others have not just accepted it, but made it part of their identity, such that it is "good", "normal", "beneficial" etc. - without ever having had a chance to compare it with the alternative, and I imagine, in many cases, never before having encountered someone who did not agree with that assessment.
Not only that, but we are in a culture in which much of a man's identity is invested in his penis. (I don't know if there is any other kind.) If you want to get killed quickly, tell a big strong man he has a small dick, or can't get it up, or that
it is not all that it could be.
At the same time, we are emerging from a culture when it was taboo to talk about sex (we have remnants of that on some of the boards where circumcision becomes cir***cision and foreskin becomes ******** and Scunthorpe becomes S****horpe, if anyone should want to mention that place). In fact infant male (and female) genital cutting was an integral part of that culture.
And we have emerged into a culture where it is permissible to talk about sex (but still sometimes in only roundabout ways). And here we are on a board where the central topic is penises.
The surprise is not that infant male genital cutting is a hot topic here, but that anyone might think it would not be, or should not be.