Circumcised as an adullt

D

deleted15807

Guest
4 days since the last circumcision thread. I knew we were way overdue.

:09:
 

jason_els

<img border="0" src="/images/badges/gold_member.gi
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Posts
10,228
Media
0
Likes
162
Points
193
Location
Warwick, NY, USA
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
There is no proof that any form of "foreskin restoration" works and the "frenar band" can never be "restored."
Foreskin restoration - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When done by a medical professional, of course its safe. Maybe they should leave the umbilical cord uncut as well...I just hope people will do the safest thing possible.
Adult Male Circumcision Significantly Reduces Risk of Acquiring HIV, December 13, 2006 News Release - National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Epinions.com - Medical Benefits of Circumcision

Medical professionals are the ones performing those with complications (as if amputation of normal, healthy, tissue wasn't a complication in itself) Guess what? They fuck-up too, just like any other doctor.

Correct. Restoration cannot completely restore what is lost but it can restore the glans to its status as an internal organ and the inner foreskin, should any remain, to its job of lubricating and protecting the glans.

Removing breasts prevents breast cancer. Castration prevents prostate cancer. Should we do these too just to prevent disease? Since when is amputation a reasonable substitute for education and a 2 cent piece of latex?
 

guiltrip

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Posts
185
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
101
Location
Penn
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Medical professionals are the ones performing those with complications (as if amputation of normal, healthy, tissue wasn't a complication in itself) Guess what? They fuck-up too, just like any other doctor.

Correct. Restoration cannot completely restore what is lost but it can restore the glans to its status as an internal organ and the inner foreskin, should any remain, to its job of lubricating and protecting the glans.

Removing breasts prevents breast cancer. Castration prevents prostate cancer. Should we do these too just to prevent disease? Since when is amputation a reasonable substitute for education and a 2 cent piece of latex?

and removing blood from people saves other people's lives and good citizens make this sacrifice everyday. Removal of the foreskin is the same as the removal of the appendix, if its going to have problems and its unecessary, then it should be removed.
 

jason_els

<img border="0" src="/images/badges/gold_member.gi
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Posts
10,228
Media
0
Likes
162
Points
193
Location
Warwick, NY, USA
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
and removing blood from people saves other people's lives and good citizens make this sacrifice everyday. Removal of the foreskin is the same as the removal of the appendix, if its going to have problems and its unecessary, then it should be removed.


People make more blood. You cannot remake your foreskin. When it's gone it's gone.

Removal of the foreskin is not the same. We only remove appendixes when they're inflamed and risk causing death. Foreskins are removed for many reasons that usually have nothing to do with health.
 

guiltrip

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Posts
185
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
101
Location
Penn
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
People make more blood. You cannot remake your foreskin. When it's gone it's gone.

Removal of the foreskin is not the same. We only remove appendixes when they're inflamed and risk causing death. Foreskins are removed for many reasons that usually have nothing to do with health.

Try telling that to all these naive douchebags who are wasting their time and money by trying to bring it back.

The threat of penile cancer can be eliminated by removing the foreskin, so that's what I mean when it's like removing the appendix.

Despite the "reasons" that people have for removing the foreskin (only part of it is removed by the way), I can't believe that people on this board are actually that insecure that they feel like "a piece of them is missing" by being circumcised. I have seen people with their faces blown off, mutilated, not able to see or speak properly, how dare anyone compare having some extra skin cut off their penis to that. Go cry to an army veteran who had his leg shot off about how you just dont think youre getting that crazy uncircumcised sensation that they've been buzzing about in the gay community (wikipedia said foreskin restoration was a gay/lesbian thing, surprise surprise).
 

jason_els

<img border="0" src="/images/badges/gold_member.gi
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Posts
10,228
Media
0
Likes
162
Points
193
Location
Warwick, NY, USA
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Try telling that to all these naive douchebags who are wasting their time and money by trying to bring it back.

It's their bodies, they're not naive. They're trying to get back some of what was taken from them against their will.

The threat of penile cancer can be eliminated by removing the foreskin, so that's what I mean when it's like removing the appendix.

A cancer that strikes less than 1% of men in countries that don't practice circumcision? By that logic we should be removing all kinds of body parts preventively.

Despite the "reasons" that people have for removing the foreskin (only part of it is removed by the way), I can't believe that people on this board are actually that insecure that they feel like "a piece of them is missing" by being circumcised. I have seen people with their faces blown off, mutilated, not able to see or speak properly, how dare anyone compare having some extra skin cut off their penis to that. Go cry to an army veteran who had his leg shot off about how you just dont think youre getting that crazy uncircumcised sensation that they've been buzzing about in the gay community (wikipedia said foreskin restoration was a gay/lesbian thing, surprise surprise).

But a piece of them IS MISSING! It's justified! They're not imagining things. Army veterans are included among those who think routine infant circumcision is unjustified. And just what kind of argument is that? Just because some people were mutilated in war that means babies should be too? That's absurd. That, "extra skin," is the most highly innervated part of the male body. Learn some anatomy before you jump to conclusions, learn some empathy before you jump to make moral judgments. Your adolescent, holier-than-thou attitude of, "It's wrong for me so it's wrong for everyone else too," indicates a clear lack of self-confidence or the ability to empathize.

And if wikipedia says it then it must be true!
 

guiltrip

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Posts
185
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
101
Location
Penn
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
It's their bodies, they're not naive. They're trying to get back some of what was taken from them against their will.



A cancer that strikes less than 1% of men in countries that don't practice circumcision? By that logic we should be removing all kinds of body parts preventively.



But a piece of them IS MISSING! It's justified! They're not imagining things. Army veterans are included among those who think routine infant circumcision is unjustified. And just what kind of argument is that? Just because some people were mutilated in war that means babies should be too? That's absurd. That, "extra skin," is the most highly innervated part of the male body. Learn some anatomy before you jump to conclusions, learn some empathy before you jump to make moral judgments. Your adolescent, holier-than-thou attitude of, "It's wrong for me so it's wrong for everyone else too," indicates a clear lack of self-confidence or the ability to empathize.

And if wikipedia says it then it must be true!

There's no majority of war veterans opposing circumcision, if anything they support it seeing as how the majority of males in the 70's were circumcised. The skin is not a limb and anyone who is missing a limb would be offended if you compared the two. Why dont you go up to an amputee and tell them "yeah I know how you feel, I was circumsised."? Believe me they would kick you if they could. You and the skin strechers are the ones with self-confidence issues, because you're ashamed of yourself and I'm happy the way I am.
 

chico8

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Posts
727
Media
0
Likes
21
Points
163
Location
Chico
Sexuality
No Response
There's no majority of war veterans opposing circumcision, if anything they support it seeing as how the majority of males in the 70's were circumcised. The skin is not a limb and anyone who is missing a limb would be offended if you compared the two. Why dont you go up to an amputee and tell them "yeah I know how you feel, I was circumsised."? Believe me they would kick you if they could. You and the skin strechers are the ones with self-confidence issues, because you're ashamed of yourself and I'm happy the way I am.

You are so sick and desperate to justify your own mutiliation, you'll go to any length won't you. How dare you speak for vets!?! Nobody has appointed you official propaganda machine.

Since many in the military are hispanic and many of them born in Mexico, it's doubtful that they've all been mutilated. The vast majority of the grunts were also born in the 80s and early to mid 90s. Genital mutilation rates have plummeted since the 70s so there's a good chance that many of them are whole men, not partial ones like you.
 

guiltrip

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Posts
185
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
101
Location
Penn
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
You are so sick and desperate to justify your own mutiliation, you'll go to any length won't you. How dare you speak for vets!?! Nobody has appointed you official propaganda machine.

Since many in the military are hispanic and many of them born in Mexico, it's doubtful that they've all been mutilated. The vast majority of the grunts were also born in the 80s and early to mid 90s. Genital mutilation rates have plummeted since the 70s so there's a good chance that many of them are whole men, not partial ones like you.

Enough of your propaganda and namecalling, I'm not going around calling them walking skin bags.
And where do you get that "many in the military are hispanic" and that they were born in Mexico. Hispanics make up about 10% of active duty (http://www.prb.org/Source/ACF1396.pdf) Whites and Blacks make up about 80%. Aside from that circumcision is common practice Mexico and I dont even know what the military's policy on hiring non native born citizens is. I'm sorry that you're ashamed of yourself, but you can't put the blame on me.
 

SteveHd

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Posts
3,678
Media
0
Likes
79
Points
183
Location
Daytona
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
USA circ rates have dropped but it's an overstatement to say "plummeted". The decline started in the mid-60s rather than the 70s.

I doubt if any soldiers have been born in the 90s: 2007 - 18 = 1989 :smile:

Chico and guiltrip, please cut *oops* the hostility down. I don't want to see the circ. threads get nasty; as they were a while back.
 

lilbear

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2006
Posts
924
Media
0
Likes
67
Points
173
Location
Alameda, California
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I am VERY glad I was cut at birth.
My last partner was uncut and I never got used to the smell of his cock. I tolerated it but much prefer a cut cock.
 

SpoiledPrincess

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Posts
7,868
Media
0
Likes
119
Points
193
Location
england
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
1&#37; of men with a foreskin will get cancer (incidentally men who've been circumcised can still get penile cancer), of these 1% of men who do get penile cancer it is the minority who have their penis amputated, many have local excision of the cancer, when the 1% figure is presented it's always presented by circumcision supporters as though the inevitable result of penile cancer is amputation.

The mortality rate from RIC is not known as the cause of death is rarely listed as circumcision but as infection contracted through the circumcision site ir hemorrhage.
 

Lee1972

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2007
Posts
91
Media
0
Likes
6
Points
93
Location
East Anglia, UK
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I was born in Malaysia and as a muslim, the kids are usually circumcised at the age of...wait for it...12 yrs old!!! Don't ask me why but for us in M'sia that's the age just before we hit puberty and we need to "clean" ourselves. Sometimes I wish I have my foreskin back but then hey, I am happy for what I got now! No one ever complaining or criticising my tool!!! :)

LeeUK
 

manhattaner

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2007
Posts
19
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
86
Location
London, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
Removing breasts prevents breast cancer. Castration prevents prostate cancer. Should we do these too just to prevent disease?

Not to jump on the pro/anti circumcision bandwagon, but the slightly older (and slightly more European crowd) may remember that there was a wave at one time when little babies (I forget exactly how soon after being born) were having their appendices removed. There was some research at the time that showed that too many appendix inflammations were being missed, and, therefore, it was a great proactive move to remove the potential problem before it became such.

Well, the trend fizzled out eventually, but there are still people who do that to their kids.

But to the discussion at hand, I've met at least 10 guys who would like to be circumcised as adults but are creeped out by the potential pain/discomfort they would experience immediately following the surgery.

And as a complete side note, I would like to hear a well-formed argument about why someone would want their forskin restored. "Because it was taken from me without my approval" is not a well-formed argument :smile: There has to be a specific reason/purpose why you want it back. Not saying there isn't one--just want to hear it :smile:
 

chico8

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Posts
727
Media
0
Likes
21
Points
163
Location
Chico
Sexuality
No Response
And as a complete side note, I would like to hear a well-formed argument about why someone would want their forskin restored. "Because it was taken from me without my approval" is not a well-formed argument :smile: There has to be a specific reason/purpose why you want it back. Not saying there isn't one--just want to hear it :smile:

If your breasts were removed, would you go around flat chested or would you get implants?
 

TLCTugger

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2007
Posts
320
Media
3
Likes
75
Points
248
Location
Chicago
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I would like to hear a well-formed argument about why someone would want their foreskin restored. "Because it was taken from me without my approval" is not a well-formed argument
You know, it's all here already if you're curious. Because restorers are rare, you must realize you can exhaust the supply of people with the patience to address this by just asking it over and over. Ugh. I'll give it another go.

Since I restored, my glans and upper skin is supple and sensitive. The skin between the scar and the glans is yielding sensations unlike anything I had experienced before. It's like a sort of itch that is only satiable by intimacy. It's really impossible to describe, like to describing "violet" to someone who had only seen in black and white.

Additionally, the frictionless rolling and gliding of the skin tube over my erect shaft triggers sensation from within the shaft that I had never had. I was never much for lubricated manual stimulation. I suppose if someone lubed with the slickest stuff on earth and used it with a very firm pressure, they might approximate this sensation.

The skin tube itself feels just incredible, especially when it's nicely puckered up and I get erect so my glans is very swollen. Rolling the slack up the shaft so it bunches up behind the corona and then just breaks over the glans - there at that instant where it has to stretch over the flare of the corona - is wild. The skin is sending out normal natural signals as it stretches circumferentially that it just didn't have the capacity to do before.

The response I get from my wife is also very different. She loves the plush full feeling as the skin bunches up with each change of direction and drags past her g-spot. She also likes staying wetter throughout long sessions since the skin sort of dams up her orifice so less moisture is dragged out to evaporate. She never gets sore no matter how long we go because there is motion and pressure with less friction.

She also likes the way I touch her now. Since I have a prepuce, I am more in tune to the way she wants her clitoral hood rubbed.

The whole act of lovemaking is so intense now that I can just enjoy every bit. There is no rush to get to the finish, whereas before, I hardly felt anything until I got close to orgasm.

Aesthetically, being covered flaccid is a much more satisfying way to present myself to my partner, or in the locker room, or to a doctor. The outer skin just below the scar has become soft and almost imperceptible from the inner skin, because my rollover point is such that some outer skin now spends its time rolled in.

But if I don't want to present as intact, it's easy enough to just roll the skin off the glans and look like a cut man with a bit more slack than average. It will stay back, since unfortunately restoring will not re-grow the frenulum which would keep the skin pulled over the glans.

-Ron
 

SteveHd

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Posts
3,678
Media
0
Likes
79
Points
183
Location
Daytona
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
SteveHd: I wonder who turned the circ threads nasty a while ago?
I have someone in mind but I'll withhold their name(s).

During that "while ago" ... I was called vulgar names, someone stated that I'm anti-Semitic, and someone stated I need "counseling". I did none of those to anyone else. I might be combative but I'm not vile.

The tone has improved and I would like for it to continue to improve.