Circumcised Guys: Are you ever jealous or resentful towards Uncut guys?

chris bell

Superior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Posts
477
Media
4
Likes
3,972
Points
313
Location
Tampa (Florida, United States)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I've seen some pretty dense posters here... Huh... I wonder where all of these reporting stations are? Maybe next to the local recruiting stations - or maybe a little stand-up in the local Mall?

I'd be happy to interview you on our Youtube channel but you would have to use your real name and location, we don't hide who are.
 

Hanging6x6

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Posts
480
Media
2,182
Likes
26,340
Points
388
Location
Atlanta (Georgia, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
I think you're the one who is clueless... although you do seem angry over the way other people feel about their own personal choices. It's a piece of foreskin, not the glans or testicles or... anything else.


Everyone, including both of you, deserve the right to your own opinions. Neither of you should be telling the other it is wrong to feel what they feel. Express your own opinions and move on.
 

pp_ryder

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Posts
990
Media
2
Likes
3,466
Points
313
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Everyone, including both of you, deserve the right to your own opinions. Neither of you should be telling the other it is wrong to feel what they feel. Express your own opinions and move on.
He has an obvious agenda here to push is views on everyone else... My only agenda is to tell him to mind his own business. I find it highly offensive!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gj816

James Bell

Loved Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Posts
132
Media
0
Likes
534
Points
213
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Make up LOL!!!!!
file:///C:/Users/13159/AppData/Local/Temp/BJU_2007_99_619.pdf

Surely all of this just misses the point. The important issue is not that nerve endings are removed when you are circumcised -of course they are. The question is only whether or not this inhibits sexual function and I have never seen any evidence that it does.

Speaking for myself I'd say it improved it for masturbation; I had no experience of anything else at that age.
 

Motion-of-the-Ocean

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Posts
9,717
Media
423
Likes
23,181
Points
408
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Sorry, neither. The condition of my penis was a decision my parents made and I am happy the way I am. Whatever decision anyone else's family or they themselves made later in life was their choice alone and if they are happy with the way they are, then all is good and that's all that should matter.
 

Nimajnev

Admired Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2019
Posts
264
Media
0
Likes
945
Points
188
Location
Orlando (Florida, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Sorry, neither. The condition of my penis was a decision my parents made and I am happy the way I am. Whatever decision anyone else's family or they themselves made later in life was their choice alone and if they are happy with the way they are, then all is good and that's all that should matter.

I think that kind of hits the nail on the head, though. It shouldn't be the family's decision under any circumstances save actual medical necessity. Because if they aren't happy the way they are and they're circumcised, there's not currently a real fix to it.
 

Flotiz

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jul 27, 2016
Posts
2,918
Media
239
Likes
26,058
Points
433
Verification
View
Gender
Male
Forgive me if I "intrude" in the discussion. I probably shouldn't even do this since I'm uncircumcised. However, wanting to be circumcised, I thought I'd leave a message. Often, when people start the circumcision debate, they forget a detail. Specifically, there are millions of uncircumcised men who, for various reasons and maybe without even wanting that, always have their glans partially or totally uncovered due to a short foreskin. So in my opinion it is quite foolish to say that circumcision is harmful (or wrong) above all because the glans is continuously uncovered and sensitivity is lost. Also because we must then consider the type of circumcision (ie the "style").
 
  • Like
Reactions: pp_ryder

chris bell

Superior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Posts
477
Media
4
Likes
3,972
Points
313
Location
Tampa (Florida, United States)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Forgive me if I "intrude" in the discussion. I probably shouldn't even do this since I'm uncircumcised. However, wanting to be circumcised, I thought I'd leave a message. Often, when people start the circumcision debate, they forget a detail. Specifically, there are millions of uncircumcised men who, for various reasons and maybe without even wanting that, always have their glans partially or totally uncovered due to a short foreskin. So in my opinion it is quite foolish to say that circumcision is harmful (or wrong) above all because the glans is continuously uncovered and sensitivity is lost. Also because we must then consider the type of circumcision (ie the "style").

Circumcision is the surgical removal of the foreskin. When you are circumcised you lose all 16 functions of the foreskin because it is no longer there. There are people who suffer lifelong complications from their circumcision so I would consider that harmful.
 

James Bell

Loved Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Posts
132
Media
0
Likes
534
Points
213
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Circumcision is the surgical removal of the foreskin. When you are circumcised you lose all 16 functions of the foreskin because it is no longer there. There are people who suffer lifelong complications from their circumcision so I would consider that harmful.
Whereas phimosis, balanitis and a higher prevalence of STDs are not harmful?
 

pp_ryder

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Posts
990
Media
2
Likes
3,466
Points
313
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Why does all of the pro genital cutting of minors fetish group use fake names?
It's called choice and I have it... and thank you to my parents for having it done early so I wouldn't have to go through it later in life.
 

ThickoneSFO

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 13, 2010
Posts
208
Media
52
Likes
5,098
Points
773
Location
San Francisco (California, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Chris, it's a fucking good thing I'm not intact because if I masturbated my cut cock much more I'd never get anything done. I love my cut cock. Loved my penis since a teenager, it serves me well. I'm really into my circumcised, just thinking about it, gives me a big fat boner, it's like Viagra too me. All this inactivism just fuels my circumsexual feelings discovered with Tumblr and now SEX Twitter. Grateful my parents had me circumcised. it's a handsome cock. i really love it. Sculpted. Improved.
 

nippledick

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jan 11, 2018
Posts
1,559
Media
57
Likes
5,930
Points
333
Location
Geneva (Switzerland)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I’m cut, but since it’s so tiny and often completely inside my body, I can replicate the feeling I think uncut guys have when they jerk off, and it feels amazing. So I think I would probably have preferred to not have been cut.

[video=medium]1525300[/video]
 

chris bell

Superior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Posts
477
Media
4
Likes
3,972
Points
313
Location
Tampa (Florida, United States)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Whereas phimosis, balanitis and a higher prevalence of STDs are not harmful?

Higher prevalence of STD's? The USA has a higher rate of HIV, AIDS and all STD's than any developed nation in the world. If circumcision prevented these diseases wouldn't all of Europe, South America, Canada, Australia, etc. have higher rates than the US?

I went to Slovenia in 2018 to interview a doctor who did a two year study on the "health benefits" of circumcision and over that two year study he found no difference in STD rates or any bacterial infections between intact and circumcised men.

This is the misinformation spread by the American medical community that causes our high rates of circumcision. I just went through this in July when our son was born. They had no idea what I do for a living and three different people asked if we wanted our son circumcised and all three told us exactly what you just said.
 

Mcuthigh

Legendary Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Posts
544
Media
0
Likes
1,429
Points
438
Location
Illinois (United States)
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
To be perfectly honest, I was circumcised at birth and am glad of of. It happened when I was an infant and have no recollection of it at all. My parents made me eat my vegetables and do my homework as well. That wasn't my choice, either. I had a short period when I was curious about it and decided that if I could have one that was only halfway down the foreskin, that would be ideal, but that stage passed as well. To be frank, I find foreskins unappealing.

It is amazing how these f _ _ king foreskin fetishists & fanatics want to establish hardcore control over every male's penis . They have every intention of creating some sort of civil right for a non-sentient piece of redundant human flesh. The foreskin is NOT self-aware and the head (glans) does NOT contain a brain.

Foreskin is but a very minor piece of the human organ called the skin. If the skin were removed from male skeletal frame and the total surface area were measured, the foreskin would truly be considered insignificant. Further, foreskin can NOT exist standalone but the host body and penis remains fully functional when the foreskin is surgically cut whole or in part. After a vasectomy (the surgical cutting and sealing of part of each vas deferens) the male's orgasm remains unchanged and is not predicated upon an actual or perceived ejaculation of semen. Finally, males who are born with a single testicle or have one testicle surgically removed due to injury or cancer remain fertile, still have erections; and produce an orgasm which remains not predicated upon an actual or perceived ejaculation of semen.

The degree to which the foreskin contributes to the production of a total qualitative and proportionally measured, multi-sensory input for human Mind's perception or experience of an orgasm is highly anecdotal and prejudiced, Anecdotal because un-circumcised males and circumcised males who remain so for their entire lives can only know of the other through observation, tactile touch, research e.g. books, and most often the opinions and prejudices of semi-qualified or unqualified individuals (e,g. women or females, whether medical professionals or not, who remain semi-qualified with their knowledge of the male anatomical components being limited to observation, tactile touch, research e.g. books); and individual, societal, and cultural prejudice of today's single-issue NOCIRC and Intactivist who have chosen to devote the majority of their lives to a fight to save all male foreskins even for the millions of cut males who absolutely do not want a foreskin ever; and just as Nazi Germany had suspicious men "dropping their trousers" in public on the Bahnhofstrasse in many cities, now in the year 2020, it is now Denmark and others talking of Banning Medical Circumcisions with legal consequences. Millions of us males never bonded with our reputed foreskins, we do not think they look like us, we do not think they are looking for us and why don't all of you career penis people find jobs that benefit the poor?