Often, even in this forum, we see debates about circumcision. Obviously everyone has their opinion: many consider the circumcised penis better, others love how nature made us and therefore also the foreskin. Beyond the beliefs of each, almost always, leaving aside the discussion about the legitimacy of neonatal circumcision (which in fact does not interests me now), we go to write about three themes: sex, hygiene and aesthetic appearance. Here, I wanted to summarize them and do a sort of survey. For each of these topics, without considering regardless your status as the best, I ask you to answer the survey if an uncircumcised or circumcised penis is preferable. The answers will obviously be the result of your experiences, ideas, nation of birth, etc.
Since the spaces for the answers in the survey are rather limited, I have only put some references. The full answers (partly the result of some justifications found online), which are very general and perhaps ridiculous or idiotic, can be read below:
1A) Hygiene - Circumcised is better because penis is easier to wash and still remains clean and odor-free for longer;
2B) Hygiene - Uncircumcised is preferable because, aside from the fact that washing it is not so complicated, the glans remains protected and does not dry out;
2A) Aesthetics - Circumcised is better because having the glans always exposed and visible is more beautiful;
2B) Aesthetics - Uncircumcised is preferable because, apart from the fact that there is no scar, with flaccid penis is more beautiful that the glans is covered;
3A) Sex - Circumcised is better because, leaving aside that since there is no skin or frenulum, you can theoretically (easily) thrust deeper, having the glans always exposed it could be less sensitive and bring to orgasm less quickly;
3B) Sex - Uncircumcised is preferable because, given the presence of the foreskin which is sensitive, there is (initially) less friction and is enjoyed more overall;
Take this initiative of mine as an attempt to discuss, for the umpteenth time, the subject of circumcision in a slightly different way than usual...
Since the spaces for the answers in the survey are rather limited, I have only put some references. The full answers (partly the result of some justifications found online), which are very general and perhaps ridiculous or idiotic, can be read below:
1A) Hygiene - Circumcised is better because penis is easier to wash and still remains clean and odor-free for longer;
2B) Hygiene - Uncircumcised is preferable because, aside from the fact that washing it is not so complicated, the glans remains protected and does not dry out;
2A) Aesthetics - Circumcised is better because having the glans always exposed and visible is more beautiful;
2B) Aesthetics - Uncircumcised is preferable because, apart from the fact that there is no scar, with flaccid penis is more beautiful that the glans is covered;
3A) Sex - Circumcised is better because, leaving aside that since there is no skin or frenulum, you can theoretically (easily) thrust deeper, having the glans always exposed it could be less sensitive and bring to orgasm less quickly;
3B) Sex - Uncircumcised is preferable because, given the presence of the foreskin which is sensitive, there is (initially) less friction and is enjoyed more overall;
Take this initiative of mine as an attempt to discuss, for the umpteenth time, the subject of circumcision in a slightly different way than usual...