- RKNG,
For the vast majority of circumcised men, that question could never be answered. They were cut as babies....
you missed the point of the question entirely. please try to set down your agenda just for a moment to think about it, nobody has to see that you've let down the bias for even a second.
if someone has a problem with the function, appearance, proportion, sensetivity, reaction, ect, of their genetalia, and they are attaching that perceived "problem" on circumcision, it is my opinion that they should consider in their mind the possibility that they would have had that "problem" even if they had not been circumcised. and I think that they should consider what they would think/feel/do/ect if that were the case.
I am sure that circumcision can have some of the effects that people complain about. I am sure it CAN be held at fault SOME of the time.
but I think theres got to be at least a portion of people griping about circumcision... would have had the problem they are dealing with REGARDLESS.
can they be sure? no.
but if you don't know the difference, and its possible that what you are blaming it on had nothing to do with it... it seems silly to be up in arms about it.
there are so many other problems in the world that would benefit so much more from the passion people have about this.