I'm not telling you it is my business, VinylBoy. I have as much a right to express an opinion, as you do, and you have as much a right to ignore my opinion, as I do to ignore yours.
No, sweetie... I've heard your opinion, as well as the many who share your sentiments. You can ignore mine all you want, but the fact still remains that the practice is legal and there's medical proof to support its benefits that doesn't require the advice or sexual preference from its dissenters. Circumcision should remain a choice for the parents who do all the work to bring babies into this world. And it should remain a choice for adult males who decide later in life to get one. But to eliminate a choice for a parent who is only looking out for the best interest of their newborn because of YOUR preferences? Yes, I'll always call out that kind of ignorance.
Just where am I personally 'assuming this fake sense of morality'?
Because, do you really care what other rational thinking and responsible parents do with their children? Probably not, as you don't care if the baby grows up with health care, proper schooling and in a proper home environment where they don't have to struggle to survive. Nah, you just care whether or not they retain their foreskin. After that, parents are on their own without your supervision.
There are MANY more serious things to worry about than their foreskin. Funny how people like you are so quick to defend a baby's rights ONLY when it comes to their dicks?
Or am I being lumped in with the previous posters?
Well, if the stiletto heel fits, Mary...
Please point out where I advocate the choice being taken away from the parents.
You don't have to say it word per word. Your opinion pretty much suggests that. You "prefer" men to be uncircumcised for whatever reason. Most people know that circumcision happens very soon after childbirth. You can put the rest of it together if you wish.
I would be really interested in this one, because I had my son circumcised.
Good for you. Wanna cookie?
If you don't think circumcision is treated differently than other surgeries in the US, please name another surgery which is performed without express written permission of the person who is being operated on,
Here's the problem, daddy...
Babies do NOT have the same "rights" as adults. They cannot read, write, or decide for themselves what is necessary for their own survival. They are completely dependent on their parents. You can try to paint some kind of doomsday, evil scenario you want about it (and believe me, you've tried), but that is the reality. So please, unless you or your son was able to sign his name on a contract at childbirth, denying their parents to give him a circumcision, to even type that ASCII above is beyond laughable. Next issue.
which removes healthy body parts, where the part can be sold for profit without informing the guardian(s), and where there is no proven medical benefit for that specific surgery.
The same way you've chosen to ignore my responses as irrelevant, is the same way you've ignored medical proof that does support circumcision. However, I NEVER ignored it. I acknowledge the fact that there's valid arguments on both sides. But because of it, AND due to the fact that the practice is still legal, parents should still have the right to have their newborn boys circumcised if they feel it to be necessary. Period.
Perhaps next time you won't just voluntarily ignore information that doesn't suit your needs. That way, when you try to debate someone who actually understands both sides of the argument you don't make yourself look like a infant-obsessed pervert in the process?
