S
SirConcis
Guest
>It's gossip that Prince Charles is circumcised, the only way we would know was if the palace >had made an official announcement and guess what - they didn't. Not long after William was born, I remember reading some article in some rag about Diana and Charles having had arguments over whether the son should be circumcised. It was said that Charles was very much in favour to uphold a strong family tradition, and Diana refusing, saying that it was unnecessary etc etc etc. This is when I realised that the media were getting carried away with trying to reveal everythinhg about their private lives. (The article was in the context of not everything being OK between the two). This made very credible the allegations that Charles has had the snip as a baby. has anyone seen recent pictures of the lads ? William definitely has some "Charles" in him. But Harry doesn't seem to have any "Charles" in him. If it would turn out that Harry has no royal blood in him (eg: the father was Diana's horse riding teacher or whatever), would Harry still be eligible to become King should William die ?