In my european opinion is huge violation of human rights. America should be ashamed of doing it!
Of course they can. Do you approve of female genital cutting, for example?Thus we can go to infinity. Most discussion theme in fact is personal-family decision.
Nobody can not refute the opinion of the other.
Tradition is not a valid reason to do harm to helpless children with permanent lifelong consequences.Facts are that circumcision is several thousand years old tradition,Jews and Muslims do it always,Americans do it about 100 years.Almost 70% african people are circumcised without religious reason.On the other side Latin-Americans and Europeans are never circumcised,except Bosnia and Turkey.
In this way we only can (personaly) agree or disagree with circumcision,Of course without insulting someone's feelings or tradition.
We can educate people out of their ignorance.We can fight more and more.But again it was parents decision.
We can`t do anything.
Of course they can. Do you approve of female genital cutting, for example?
Tradition is not a valid reason to do harm to helpless children with permanent lifelong consequences.
We can educate people out of their ignorance.
OK,maxcok. Thus we can go till infinity.
-You can not change my opinion ,I can not change your opinion about this.
No one can refute someone's opinion.
Of course they can.
Then maybe you should try to examine objectively why you approve of cutting the genitals of male children, but not females. What justifies one in your mind and not the other?I personally do not approve female genital cutting,but it is my opinion, Some people approve this and do this thousands of years.
Whether it's based in religion or cultural tradition does not negate a practice being harmful, this or any other. That's illogical. Sprinkling water or even full immersion baptism doesn't remotely compare to the permanent removal of a highly sensitive, functional, intimate body part from nonconsenting children. That's a ridiculous analogy.Some people would not call it harm,because they do it for religious reason or for some traditions reason.You can not easily cancel one's tradition,look at baptism.
Of course we have the right to judge barbaric practices based on nothing more than "tradition". Many advanced countries have outlawed female genital cutting, for example, religious or cultural "tradition" notwithstanding, including the US: U.S. Female Genital Mutilation Law. Being a parent does not give you the right to do any damn thing you want to your children, rather it obligates you to care for and protect them. Sometimes the law even sees fit to step in and make sure you don't harm your children.We do not have the right to judge on someone's religion or tradition.
Everything about this is personal (parents decision).
How do you justify cutting the genitals of male children, while you disapprove cutting female children?Tradition is not a valid reason to do harm to helpless children with permanent lifelong consequences.
I don't wish to "argue" either, but I think civilized debate is just fine. If you express an opinion here, you can expect someone with a different opinion might respond, and there's nothing wrong with that. This is not a forum where people are allowed to make pronouncements or speeches immune from being questioned or challenged.I really do not wish to argue with you this way.
Yet it appears that you have no problem judging female genital cutting, which is also based on faith or tradtion. And just because one judges a particular practice, does not mean one is judging the "faith" that it's based in. That's a deflective argument.I personally do not want to judge either of whose faith or tradition.With someone or something I might not agree,but I will not judge.
No, I was merely responding to the disconnect in your thinking, the absurd analogies and logical fallacies presented in your arguments, and your repetition of same even after they'd been discredited. If you are finished with the notion that children's bodies are the property of their parents to do whatever they will, that cutting female children is unacceptable while cutting male children is just fine, that "tradition" perfectly justifies cutting males, while "tradition" is not sufficient reason to cut females, and unless you can offer any other logical justification for this practice, I have nothing further to add.If you want, go ahead (without me).
I have often wondered if male circumcision is a primitive and subconscious way for societies to discourage homosexuality... ie the first experience a baby boy has of a man is an intense pain... just a thought though.
Seconded.:no: More! :crying: Too many! :yell: Mods please open a circumsion/Uncircumsion Section in LPSG for people to post to, every where you look on here its being discussed to death.