stax 68
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2016
- Posts
- 540
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 415
- Points
- 73
- Location
- los angeles
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Male
...Weird that a parent would want their child to live with a scar on their genitals.
Chicks dig scars...
...Weird that a parent would want their child to live with a scar on their genitals.
They are used with adults as well. My scar is barely noticeable, something like a mogen clamp was used, I was done at birth. I’ve seen adult circ on the board and recognized mogen clamp circs.Of the few circumcisions that hardly show a scar line, I wonder if that circumcision was done with a scapel instead of a clamp? Also when an adult is circumcised, is it done freehand with a scapel? Or are clamps also used for adult circumcisions?
That’s disturbing.I've only seen one botched circumcision. I saw a guy in a locker room whose dick scar looked like small snippets were cut in a zig zag pattern. It must have been done by an amature. I have a friend who was circumcised by his own dad. I asked him if it looked like other guy's circumcised dicks. He said it did. His older brother was also done by their dad.
That’s disturbing.
Well that about ruined my evening. That’s horrific.You ain't heard nothing yet. This happened in Atlanta in 1985.
"lawsuits filed in behalf of the two children, the infants suffered severe electrical burns to the penis and adjacent areas when physicians, in separate incidents on the same day, used an electric cauterizing needle as part of the circumcision procedure.
The burns to one of the infants were so severe that his penis was destroyed. A sex change operation has been performed so that the child will be raised as a female, according to a lawsuit filed on behalf of the child's parents, who are identified only as Mr. and Mrs. John Doe."
Most likely they used a clamp along w/ the cauterizing needle...which caused burned tissue.
"More than 1.5 million circumcisions are performed annually in the United States, and physicians agree that complications of any kind are infrequent. But they do occur. Of the type of injury that occurred in Atlanta, Dr. George A. Kaplan, a pediatric urologist in San Diego, said, ''I am aware of about six or eight cases.'' There does not appear to be any general reporting system for these injuries so there is no real way of knowning how many more cases, if any, have occurred."
"
''The hospital expresses its deep concern for the children,'' she said.
Both accidents took place Aug. 23, but involved separate physicians.
The infant who has undergone a sex change operation is referred to in the lawsuit only as ''Baby Doe.'' The lawsuit demands damages in excess of $10,000. Under Georgia law, the actual damage amount cannot be specified if it exceeds $10,000. As a result of the accident, the lawsuit charges, ''Baby Doe is now a female person, who has been rendered sterile and completely incapable of reproduction, and who will require medical monitoring and hormonal therapy throughout the remainder of her life.''
Negligence Is Charged"
A CIRCUMCISION METHOD DRAWS NEW CONCERN
Everyone has different preferences. Personally, I think your cock is HOT! But that's my own bias toward circumcised penises with prominent circumcision scars and/or dual-tone skin. The more 'obvious' it is that the cock is circumcised, the more beautiful I think it is!How come some people don't seem to have them, but it's very evident on others?
I've seen some pictures of a few circumcised men on here, and I was actually jealous that their skin color was even all along the shaft and the scar just blends in, while mine is pretty tan up to the scar but pink above the scar and on my head.
Do I have my doctor to blame, or is it just how I am?
Funny, again, I think the other way about this in general. LolEveryone has different preferences. Personally, I think your cock is HOT! But that's my own bias toward circumcised penises with prominent circumcision scars and/or dual-tone skin. The more 'obvious' it is that the cock is circumcised, the more beautiful I think it is!
I agree. I like the prominent scar. Dual colors is so cool looking. Mine is obvious and I point it out ever chance I getEveryone has different preferences. Personally, I think your cock is HOT! But that's my own bias toward circumcised penises with prominent circumcision scars and/or dual-tone skin. The more 'obvious' it is that the cock is circumcised, the more beautiful I think it is!
‘Routine’ operations go wrong all the time. Why do you think medical malpractice insurance is skyrocketing? Yes what happened was horrible. 40,000 people die from car accidents every year in the USA not numbering people horribly injured along with those deaths. Do we ban car driving unless in an emergency? Please don’t pull up medical accidents as a way of trying to get people to go along with your certain viewpoint.You ain't heard nothing yet. This happened in Atlanta in 1985.
"lawsuits filed in behalf of the two children, the infants suffered severe electrical burns to the penis and adjacent areas when physicians, in separate incidents on the same day, used an electric cauterizing needle as part of the circumcision procedure.
The burns to one of the infants were so severe that his penis was destroyed. A sex change operation has been performed so that the child will be raised as a female, according to a lawsuit filed on behalf of the child's parents, who are identified only as Mr. and Mrs. John Doe."
Most likely they used a clamp along w/ the cauterizing needle...which caused burned tissue.
"More than 1.5 million circumcisions are performed annually in the United States, and physicians agree that complications of any kind are infrequent. But they do occur. Of the type of injury that occurred in Atlanta, Dr. George A. Kaplan, a pediatric urologist in San Diego, said, ''I am aware of about six or eight cases.'' There does not appear to be any general reporting system for these injuries so there is no real way of knowning how many more cases, if any, have occurred."
"
''The hospital expresses its deep concern for the children,'' she said.
Both accidents took place Aug. 23, but involved separate physicians.
The infant who has undergone a sex change operation is referred to in the lawsuit only as ''Baby Doe.'' The lawsuit demands damages in excess of $10,000. Under Georgia law, the actual damage amount cannot be specified if it exceeds $10,000. As a result of the accident, the lawsuit charges, ''Baby Doe is now a female person, who has been rendered sterile and completely incapable of reproduction, and who will require medical monitoring and hormonal therapy throughout the remainder of her life.''
Negligence Is Charged"
A CIRCUMCISION METHOD DRAWS NEW CONCERN
I’m sorry but that comparison is idiotic. Comparing elective surgery that doesn’t have any benefits to someone who isn’t the person who decided and consented to it is not the same thing as choosing to drive a car and having an accident. Are you going to compare it to drug use next?‘Routine’ operations go wrong all the time. Why do you think medical malpractice insurance is skyrocketing? Yes what happened was horrible. 40,000 people die from car accidents every year in the USA not numbering people horribly injured along with those deaths. Do we ban car driving unless in an emergency? Please don’t pull up medical accidents as a way of trying to get people to go along with your certain viewpoint.
Bringing about statistical outliers in surgery accidents is ludicrous also. Yoy bring up accidents that happened 1985? Really? We elect to drive. We elect to have surgery called elective surgery. The most dangerous thing statically that can happen to you in the USA is to drive. It is relevant. You talk about a statistical outlier as if it happens as on a regular basis. I brought in the the death by autos as a point to the scope of the surgerical accidents compared to what happens normally in our society. You are against it. Just say it and get it over. Statistical anomalies might be tragic but they are rare. Far many more elective surgeries (e.g. breast augmentation) end horribly than circumcision surgeries.I’m sorry but that comparison is idiotic. Comparing elective surgery that doesn’t have any benefits to someone who isn’t the person who decided and consented to it is not the same thing as choosing to drive a car and having an accident. Are you going to compare it to drug use next?
I never brought that shit up. It doesn’t make your comparison any more valid.Bringing about statistical outliers in surgery accidents is ludicrous also. Yoy bring up accidents that happened 1985? Really? We elect to drive. We elect to have surgery called elective surgery. The most dangerous thing statically that can happen to you in the USA is to drive. It is relevant. You talk about a statistical outlier as if it happens as on a regular basis. I brought in the the death by autos as a point to the scope of the surgerical accidents compared to what happens normally in our society. You are against it. Just say it and get it over. Statistical anomalies might be tragic but they are rare. Far many more elective surgeries (e.g. breast augmentation) end horribly than circumcision surgeries.