Ok well this is a very controversial topic, with a great number of view points, and backgrounds that have shaped those view points. But the things that the debate comes back to are these. 1. Are the benifits of circumcision? 2. Are there negitives of circumcision? and.. 3. Is infant circumcision a human rights breach? I have my own opinions that have been formed by reading peer review published medical journals. And this is what i have found. Ans 1. Yes there are benifits to circumcision, such as slightly decreased risk of some medical conditions, and a decrease in the transfer of HIV (but on that issue maybe a condom is better suited to the task). Ans 2. Yes there are some significant negitives of circumcision (esp infant circumcision). While the results are mixed with their findings, i have not found a single journal that shows quantitive evidence for a sexual improvement after circumcision. I have found a large number that support that there is a significant decrease in the sexual pleasure after circumcision. Ans 3. Circumcision is not recomended for medical reasons by the AAP or other large medical bodies, and therefore should not be considered a medical procedure. Based on this it should be considered a consmetic surgery and with that in mind cosmetic surgery on babys is not ok by any stnadard. IMPORTANT!!!!!!!!! If you wish to contribute you opinion to this post please give links to AT LEAST one medical journal (yes peer reviewed and published). They can be found on google scholar. I am sick of hearing all the bullshit that has no scientific backing and is just some random persons opinion that they have made a website for. PLEASE give a reference for any claims made. Thanks guys and girls. My Links Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks. -- Moses et al. 74 (5): 368 -- Sexually Transmitted Infections http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1733522/pdf/v028p00010.pdf Male Circumcision and Sexual Enjoyment of the Female Partner. /> Circumcision in adults: effect on sexual function.