Have you ever seen a human corpse, 2-3 days after death, bloated black and blue, worms already feasting? Nobody escapes that. Now, what is your important question about circumcision?
Indeed, if I understand it, this argument could be used to justify any atrocity at all, because death is worse.This is a weird ethical argument. Next time I want to kick someone, I'll just go for it, and if they complain...well, everyone dies eventually?
I think if you're making the argument "life is suffering so who cares," chances are good you're losing on the merits.
What kind of resolution to the question are you looking for?
But an ethical defence could be:
but we all have an exposed glans when having sex, so what is wrong with having an exposed glans when not having sex ?
That's ur opinion Pete. Personally I find uncut a total deal breaker. In fact all my buddies and I talk about our sex lives and 99 percent of them won't even hook up with a guy who is uncut.
Aren't you lucky to live at a time and place when circumcision is common, then? For most of human history and over most of the world, you'd have been shit out of luck. (In fact of course, it's the prevalence of circumcised dicks when and where you are that makes you familiar with them, and hence to like them.)That's ur opinion Pete. Personally I find uncut a total deal breaker. In fact all my buddies and I talk about our sex lives and 99 percent of them won't even hook up with a guy who is uncut.
We all have an exposed cock when having a piss, so what is wrong with having an exposed cock when not having a piss (in church, say)?But an ethical defence could be:
but we all have an exposed glans when having sex, so what is wrong with having an exposed glans when not having sex ?
Resolution to what question? I'm against RIC. I don't think "but we all die anyway" is an ethical defense.
Ooh! An opinion? How meaningful. There are 5 billion people on this planet. Thank you for starting a thread stating your opinion.
We all have an exposed cock when having a piss, so what is wrong with having an exposed cock when not having a piss (in church, say)?
you should never get a newborn boy cirked at all. there is no reason to cut off healthy skin, esp when it's there for a purpose. The only one who should deside this is the owner of the penis.
My husband was circumcised as a baby and his opinion was never taken into consideration. He realized his sensitivity may have been different otherwise and was pretty upset about it... he's come to terms with it! We are big on natural practices and will not be snipping our kids why cause unnecessary pain??
Still sexy either way, I love his trunk :wink:
Im still scared of the backlash were probly gonna get from no circumcision. Religion and family are fucking pushy as hell.