Do you hear what I hear?
Did someone say 'fetish'?
Do you hear what I hear?
A foreskin
a foreskin
shivers in the cold
let us bring it silver and gold
for it will being us goodness and light
Weird? Is that an ad hominem attack? I do think it is. :frown1: I thought the circ squad was above that. The air up there on Mount Olympus must be a little thin today?
Any who it's high time we celebrate the foreskin for what it is. Have you no reverence at all? It is our savior, our redeemer, our King. The joy bringer, the love giver. The night school teacher, the good life preacher. The caretaker, the kiss craver.
Nothing else generates so much praise here at LPSG.
Weird? Is that an ad hominem attack? I do think it is. :frown1: I thought the circ squad was above that. The air up there on Mount Olympus must be a little thin today?
Any who it's high time we celebrate the foreskin for what it is. Have you no reverence at all? It is our savior, our redeemer, our King. The joy bringer, the love giver. The night school teacher, the good life preacher. The caretaker, the kiss craver.
Nothing else generates so much praise here at LPSG.
A doctor diagnosed a foreskin problem. Suggests circumcision. In what way ios this a fetish ? The OP wanted some advise whether circ was necessary or not. The anti-circ brigade has a standard answer of "circ is never necessary" without even considering what the current state of the guy's foreskin really is. The OP did not state whetyer the pictures in his profile reflect the current state of his foreskin or not.
With regards to masturbation. I may be circumcised now, but I grew up uncut, and have read and gree with the anti-circ document by Dr Beauges who advocates proper masturbation technique to ensure the foreskin can remain easily retractable throughoiut puberty and adulthood.
The problem is that guys with tight foreksins adapt their masturbation method to NOT stretch their foreskin as that is uncomfortable, so their tight foreskin remains or gets worse. Stretching exercises might loosen up the foreksin, but if the masturbation method does not change to ensure full retraction at every stroke, then the skin tightness can return.
Do you hear what I hear?
Did someone say 'fetish'?
Do you hear what I hear?
A foreskin
a foreskin
shivers in the cold
let us bring it silver and gold
for it will being us goodness and light
Weird? Is that an ad hominem attack? I do think it is. :frown1: I thought the circ squad was above that. The air up there on Mount Olympus must be a little thin today?
Any who it's high time we celebrate the foreskin for what it is. Have you no reverence at all? It is our savior, our redeemer, our King. The joy bringer, the love giver. The night school teacher, the good life preacher. The caretaker, the kiss craver.
Nothing else generates so much praise here at LPSG.
Your claim is invalid because it's wrong. That's a totally separate issue from you being a weird dude.
weird
   [weerd] Show IPA adjective, weird·er, weird·est, noun
adjective 1. involving or suggesting the supernatural; unearthly or uncanny: a weird sound; weird lights.
2. fantastic; bizarre: a weird getup.
Huuum looking at the definition your comment seems a but incongruous.
What 'claim' is invalid mi amigo? I stand by them all.
sargon, you are a seriously weird dude.
Nope, an ad hominem is an "attempt to negate the validity of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief of the person supporting it." Your claim isn't invalid because you're a weird dude. Your claim is invalid because it's wrong. That's a totally separate issue from you being a weird dude.
You don't exactly make clear arguments very often, but your stuff defending RIC has been consistently among the worst arguments here. You're mostly here to troll, as far as I can tell.
It's counterintuitive to me that someone would prefer to be circumcised. It's something I'd never want for myself.
I see so you can redefine 'ad hominem' at will by adding the disqualifier 'your claim is invalid because you're wrong'. Then launch an actual ad hominem attack. And you don't even have to prove it. Nice. So you weren't trying to be negative by saying 'weird'? It was a compliment then :wink:
Troll? Now how did you put it in another thread?Sorry to piss in this topic's collective bowl of Wheaties.
[/INDENT]And there you go with RIC again. Your obsession is peaking out again. I hardly ever mention RIC as I could care less about the cocks on little babies but you can't stop talking about it You should really see someone about that before your interviews for med school start should you even manage to get that far. This board takes up a majority of your time.
Then again your mission statement here is very clear.
"I assume you don't think personally criticizing people on the Internet is the most important issue, but you do it pretty obsessively.)
" I have 0.55 posts per day. You have 2.73. Just get over yourself and reply to something substantively for once.
...your stuff defending RIC has been consistently among the worst arguments here.
Yeah, people with a fetish for surgical alteration can be kind of annoying, can't they?
Looks like the OP hasn't even logged on since he posted pretty much. Hope he eventually at least reads all this given the time everybody has taken to try to give some helpful advice!
I must say you do love double standards. Who was it again that started this most recent stream? Now how weird is that?
You do love meaningless stats. Shall I count the length of your posts (again)? You always have me beat by at least 2-to-1. Do I have to 'Donald Duck' that for you?
Since you do love 'research' I'd like you to find my posts regarding this:
I'd be fascinated to hear my arguments regarding RIC.
Yes thisThe problem is that guys with tight foreksins adapt their masturbation method to NOT stretch their foreskin as that is uncomfortable, so their tight foreskin remains or gets worse. Stretching exercises might loosen up the foreksin, but if the masturbation method does not change to ensure full retraction at every stroke, then the skin tightness can return.