No...
I mean guys who want to continue to see quarrels over this silly topic and get off on it are annoying.
Well, I for one do not come here to see people fight. I have my beliefs and I present information to support them. I suppose you were referring to Sargon?
I'd be fascinated to hear my arguments regarding RIC.
You don't think circumcision affects sexual sensitivity, judging by the MANY times you have quoted the American Academy of Pediatrics official stance in refutation of evidence showing the contrary. You believe that circumcision prevents HIV, because you've posted the African Hiv prevention/circumcision studies, as well as the WHO's recommendations to circumcise for HIV prevention. Those are the only things you actually bother to post evidence/information for anyways.
I'd actually say your true feelings on RIC are: Don't care, how can I piss people off today? Whatever. In any real debate setting you'd already have been laughed out of the building by now. You weaken the stance of anyone arguing for any benefits of circumcision by your very presence. By all means, continue to spout your nonsense. You only make our job easier.
Of course, you could prove me wrong and actually attempt to refute the Sorrels study.
Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis - Sorrells - 2007 - BJU International - Wiley Online Library Go on, Sargon! Sorrels is something like 70 years old now. You can take him!
We know you won't though. Between ad hominem attacks on Sorrels, accusations of mental illness, and citations of dated medical stances, you're spent on the subject. Enjoy your time masturbating to self-created conflict in circumcision threads. I suppose when you get sore, I'll see you back in the Politics forum, where you allow yourself to use logic again.
