Clarifications of the TOS / Discussion

[odd_fish_9]

The moderators do allow single links in the signature to a personal website.

Unless of course it's a link to BigD's site. We were made aware in the "Why was ... " etc thread that such links were removed or requested to be removed. Has this policy been abandoned? Or does the careful phrasing mean that it is not a moderator policy, but someone else's?

Edit: I added the /Discussion to the Thread Title to differentiate it from the moderator's closed sticky official clarification thread

No editing was done to the post except adding this edit section.

Freddie

 

[ManlyBanisters]

Unless of course it's a link to BigD's site. We were made aware in the "Why was ... " etc thread that such links were removed or requested to be removed. Has this policy been abandoned? Or does the careful phrasing mean that it is not a moderator policy, but someone else's?

Hi big_d. How's it going? Not enough people to talk to over at your own site?

 

[Northland]

Hi big_d. How's it going? Not enough people to talk to over at your own site?

Who or what is big_d/BigD? I have found several mentions of it (not sure if it is a person, a website or both). Could someone please clarify this for me?

 

[ManlyBanisters]

Who or what is big_d/BigD? I have found several mentions of it (not sure if it is a person, a website or both). Could someone please clarify this for me?

The answers are within, child.

Bet you wish you hadn't asked now!

 

[camper joe]

The answers are within, child.

Bet you wish you hadn't asked now!

:hitwithrock: :nono:

:lmao:

 

[Northland]

The answers are within, child.

Bet you wish you hadn't asked now!

Yes, thank you most sincerely and kindly for providing this link, it has been of immense help in answering my questions.

 

[Freddie53]

Unless of course it's a link to BigD's site. We were made aware in the "Why was ... " etc thread that such links were removed or requested to be removed. Has this policy been abandoned? Or does the careful phrasing mean that it is not a moderator policy, but someone else's?

To answer your question, that policy is still in effect. It was Rob_E, the owner, who made that policy public. If it should change, I'm sure it will be he that will announce it.

I doubt this is an issue that is open to debate as in terms of getting a policy change. I don't see that happening.

But that is my personal opinion.

 

[SteveHd]

... Edit: I added the /Discussion to the Thread Title to differentiate it from the moderator's closed sticky official clarification thread ...

It looks like the change didn't work. The title on post #1 changed but the thread title didn't.

 

[Mem]

Hi big_d. How's it going? Not enough people to talk to over at your own site?

LOL, a real LOL, I only reserve LOL for actual laughing out loud ., thanks MB.