novice_btm said:
nathangsm said:
...Otherwise, the only things that remain untouched are the gluteal cleavage, perineum, genitalia, nipples and female breasts.
So, I'm guessing that one of them sliding their hand down my crack, once, was "inappropriate"?
Well, there are many significant attachments along the sacral border, coccygeal ligaments, attachments to the ischial tuberosities, etc... I mean, I couldn't say without knowing
exactly how it happened, but I suppose it could have been with legitimate therapeutic intent that the therapist needed access to what you might perceive as "crack". After all, depending upon individual musculature, "crack" might encompass a commonly accessed region, and in your case, we should probably replace "might" with "likely".
novice_btm said:
nathangsm said:
And while I also dislike stereotypes, I've found my own set of expectations regarding client behavior, on the basis of gender, race, and age.
Hmm, I have to admit, I'm curious what that means.
Well, to stay on topic, Re: Clothing the ass / booty, there are certain trends, in regards to complete or incomplete disrobing (removal of undergarment(s)). I'd say that older clients are more likely to completely undress then younger clients, but young women are much more likely to wear more revealing undergarments (thong rear) as opposed to young men (knee-length boxers). Say we look at women in their mid- thirties to forties, a slight majority of caucasian-descent women will disrobe completely, but if they retain an undergarment, it will almost always be a brief-style, whereas women of African-American-descent in the same age group are significantly more likely to wear an undergarment during a treatment, they are also more likely to wear a contemporary garment (i.e., thong rear) through their thirties and early forties. At least, this has been MY experience.