1
13788
Guest
carolinacurious:
I think you should be able to expect the same from others.
I'm not really sure we are having this conversation. (If you can get my meaning from my previous posts)
I don't see anyone advocating abhorrent behavior, certainly not me.
The main point of contention is how to react when someone else crosses the line and even that point is somewhat vague, to me anyway.
It is very clear to me that he was talking about being on the receiving side of things, at least from what was written, to me there is no ambiguity on that point.
It's not clear to me that Indianaman was talking about RIGHTS, I know I have been. I have asked Indianaman a specific question that would clear this up, at least for me. But it's too vague for me at this point.
I've said before and in case there is any confusion: I know you were within your rights.
I feel rather strongly: If someone forces ME into an exceptional circumstance, I really don't want to hear about how I handled wrongly later (at least from a legal standpoint anyway). Break into my house and you get what you get, "I violated your rights?", too fucking bad, I didn't put your ass there, nor did I ask to be woken up in the middle of the night to make an immediate life or death decision.
I have never, NEVER, put my hands on any part of a person that could even slightly be construed as sexual without clear consent, I don't see why I shouldn't expect the same from others. Why we are even having this conversation baffles me, but it does make clear why some people act abhorrently.
I think you should be able to expect the same from others.
I'm not really sure we are having this conversation. (If you can get my meaning from my previous posts)
I don't see anyone advocating abhorrent behavior, certainly not me.
The main point of contention is how to react when someone else crosses the line and even that point is somewhat vague, to me anyway.
Now whether he was talking about giving or receiving I couldn't say, but I see what you're saying now, Carolinacurious. To me, it doesn't matter, because we were talkings about RIGHTS. If he wants to be forgiving, that's his right, certainly! But it certainly can't be expected that other do accordingly.
It is very clear to me that he was talking about being on the receiving side of things, at least from what was written, to me there is no ambiguity on that point.
It's not clear to me that Indianaman was talking about RIGHTS, I know I have been. I have asked Indianaman a specific question that would clear this up, at least for me. But it's too vague for me at this point.
I've said before and in case there is any confusion: I know you were within your rights.
I feel rather strongly: If someone forces ME into an exceptional circumstance, I really don't want to hear about how I handled wrongly later (at least from a legal standpoint anyway). Break into my house and you get what you get, "I violated your rights?", too fucking bad, I didn't put your ass there, nor did I ask to be woken up in the middle of the night to make an immediate life or death decision.