Usually I dont care about these celeb things but here's a quote from a magazine that strongly implies he's hung...or has a micropenis: "His scenes include a gay snog and a full-frontal nude scene which has been axed because test audiences were reportedly so shocked at the size of his manhood." From 'Sunday' (The News of The World's Sunday Supplement 10 October) So really people what is the deal here? I don't think he's hung but that quote disturbs me, is it false advertising?
he is certainly not as handsome or Hung or sexy as yourself Knight,but he is certainly hung,you have to see his movies.kiss Lauren
sausagekingchi: he is certainly not as handsome or Hung or sexy as yourself Knight,but he is certainly hung,you have to see his movies.kiss Lauren [post=260405]Quoted post[/post][/b][/quote] He actually has all ready shown it off in a movie (i can't recall the name), and it was very unimpressive. In that movie you are speaking of the rumour is he looks huge in the shot. He may have had a semi-hard on or even a prosthetic on.
YoungNHung19: I am going to answer all of your questions over Colin's penis size..click on this website and see the close up of his flaccid wiener from the Tigerland movie...unsure about hard, but he is only average in flaccid length. http://www.stars-masculines-nues.com/colin_farrell3.jpg
Have your fun, of course ! But, just keep in mind in the stars masuculine nues site, you have several choices in what sections to view-- The section with the confirmed (true) sizes (pretty much established as fact.) And....the other section for "guess-ti-mated" / fanciful .....ASSUMPTIONS of celebrity endowment. (There IS a difference)
Sounds like all of you who are wondering about Colin Farrell's endowment will have another chance to check it out: http://www.nypost.com/entertainment/33743.htm
