Comparing importance of looks/endowment

[13788]

mindseye: Hmm. For me, it really depends on how good-looking we're talking about. If the guy is too good-looking, it's a turnoff for me.

I know a good-looking guy who has four different kinds of soap in his bathroom -- one for his face, one for his hands, one for something else I can't remember -- maybe his feet, and one for everything else. He's got more hair-care products than Safeway. That much attention to detail -- well, more power to him, I guess, but it's a little over the top.

When I see a guy who has *everything* in place, I tend to wonder how much time and effort (and money) he spent on getting that way. And if he's got that much time for grooming, hair care, clothing, working out, tanning, etc., I figure that his life can't have much in common with mine. Not to mention I'd feel a lot more self-conscious shucking my clothes next to Mr. Perfect.

On the other hand, being well-hung is just a matter of lucky genetics, and not (for most guys at least) a matter of spending hours a day on it. I'm not likely to conclude anything about the guy's personality based on his dick size.

 

[13788]

Javierdude22: Hm...difficult.

I agree with Mindseye on the too goodlooking stuff...in a girl or guy, I like au naturel (damn that sounds weird)...so...natural...

Rather no make-up (or just a touch) no hideous perfume that kills all the plants in the neighbourhood, no long time fiddling with hair, and no almost-real-but-still-fake overdone tan.

I could care less about a dudes package, although I do like it in women...really small breasts is a turnoff...cant help that. No obesity please.

But now the package/looks choice. With a dude it will always be looks and his attitude, which should be normal. Dont try to pinpoint me on whats normal or not...I mean, if he is bi/gay...fine, but that doesnt mean there should be a particularly off way of behaviour just cause he isnt straight. I think that is the biggest turnoff from the non-straight world. Sexual preference shouldnt define behaviour in other areas and situations.

With a girl, it will definately be looks first...i seem to fall for the angelesque look with strong personality, that will always keep me interested. But Praise the Lord if shes got a rack 8)

 

[13788]

blo1988: 1) Good looks is a good start ,2) A good personality and intelligence will certainly make me consider someone taht I may have overlooked initiially, 3) A big dick can be a nice asset, but my personal experience is that the person is not necessarily sexy just because they have a large unit. I have been with two different guys who were 9' or more...one was pure sex, the other BORING, BORING, BORING.
(The women that I have been most attracted to are petite and have great legs)

 

[13788]

8rmore: I would love to have kept you laughing, smiling, and giving you good sex, but you still haven't answered my question about what you lied about. So many questions I have asked you, and still no answers, yet I'm obviously still intrigued...aren't I.

 

[jonb]

First priority: If you do it on the first date, you've just disqualified yourself as relationship material. Who knows what you have?

But in terms of looks vs endowment, definitely looks. I could never understand men who go for H-cup breasts. But here's my own list of things:

• Figure If you're obese, forget it. And the same goes for 'heroin chic'. I don't date women who are too short either; our looks clash too much.
• Hygiene I don't date dirty women. Don't have the immune genes for it. I can tolerate a blemish here or there, but if your hair looks like ZZ Top's beards, I'm not interested.
• Fake people Fake hair, fake nails, fake breasts . . . Men know you're a fake, so fake off.

 

[13788]

Javierdude22: [quote author=jonb link=board=relationships;num=1075053041;start=20#24 date=03/18/04 at 14:35:34][*]Fake people Fake hair, fake nails, fake breasts . . . Men know you're a fake, so fake off.[/list][/quote]

Forgot about that last one very important...

 

[HungArnold]

i stand by my earlier comment - no hard and fast rule.

 

[jonb]

[quote author=Javierdude24 link=board=relationships;num=1075053041;start=20#25 date=03/18/04 at 17:57:25]

Forgot about that last one very important...[/quote]
Oh, actually, I found out, we'll be hearing a lot more of that fake-swearing; Congress has passed a law making swear words on TV illegal. Among them include a donkey with a hole, a chicken with a lollipop, and the letter F plus a duck minus the letter D. As well as all compound, adjective, adverb, gerund, participle, and infinitive forms. But they didn't include the pluperfect subjunctive, so they can just go have had to fuck themselves. LOL