joe_smith
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2006
- Posts
- 227
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 5
- Points
- 163
- Location
- San Antonio, Texas
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
All of the above, though they are too tight when erect. There are also vibrating and textured condoms around... not sure what they're about.Why do you use condoms, For protection, brithcontrol, keep from making a mess or just like the feel of them?
I think a much better question would be why wouldn't you use one.... what is this the 70's?
condoms suck. i always hold out for monogamy.
a) STI protection
b) reassurance incase the birth control wasn't as effective as it should be.
c) cleaning other male's cum isn't sexy...
LOL... no they have changed the name... or at least locally to Sexually Transmitted Infection...The first time I read the typo above I registered it as "SDI Protection"... which would have been much more interesting as I was not aware that condoms could protect you from nuclear missles.
LOL... no they have changed the name... or at least locally to Sexually Transmitted Infection...
Disease sounds worse than infection... it was from an adult probably older than you that I heard the name change from though.oh. fuck that. I'm going to continue using the term STD so that the younglings may easily identify me as an old person then.
Sorry to break the news to you Roger--the condom greatly reduces the risk of std it does not completely eliminate it. All you need is a drip or a drop of fluid oozing over from your partner into the edges of your wraPper and then bing bboing bang your infected and depending on what it is that you pick up, you are also DEAD2. No worrying about disease.
Sorry to break the news to you Roger--the condom greatly reduces the risk of std it does not completely eliminate it. All you need is a drip or a drop of fluid oozing over from your partner into the edges of your wraPper and then bing bboing bang your infected and depending on what it is that you pick up, you are also DEAD. Aside from the usual fluids of sex, remember that a little not so friendly blood to blood (even in very tiny cuts of skin) can infect you with the not so friendly HIV. In other wordsm condoms reduce the worry and reduce the risk--they do not end it.
And my point was--and is--that the condom is not a worry free matter. What I am fucking trying to get across here is that the moronic imbecile who races about randomly porking every man woman and lightbulb socket that they can is running risks for themself and others.That is dramatically overstating the truth, to say the least. Condoms used properly have proven to be very effective against the transmssion of many STDs, especially HIV. Diseases that transmit skin-to-skin like herpes maybe less so, but blood-borne pathogens like HIV need very favorable conditions which condoms negate. If condoms were as unreliable as you say, A LOT more people who use them would have become infected. But they haven't.
Of course condoms do break on rare occasions, espcially when not put on properly. But that's another story.
For the record I know 3 persons who ended up at the wrong end of HIV even though a condom was always involved. My point in this Matthew is that even if you use a condom it is still wise to be checked regular for any and all STDs, As usual people refuse to see the facts, all I was trying to do was educate the likes of Roger and otheres who think slapping a condom on gives them a disease frre ride. Sorry that the truth offends so much although I am never ever surprised on this board when people refuse to be offered some information, perhaps using the word DEAD was over dramatic, but when it comes to life and death it is often necessary to go to such extremes.
That's because the condom goes over the *Missile*, not the pentagon. When will our government learn...The first time I read the typo above I registered it as "SDI Protection"... which would have been much more interesting as I was not aware that condoms could protect you from nuclear missles.