B_subgirrl
Sexy Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Posts
- 5,547
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 33
- Points
- 73
- Location
- NSW, Australia
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Female
I know what you mean! Oh, wait, what I really meant was,
Ew! You perv! :tongue:
:biggrin1: Glad you understood!
I wonder why you didn't like the copper IUD.
There were a few reasons. I didn't like the idea that it could make my periods worse (the implant can do that, but the risk seems to be lower, and I have less negatives and more positives for the implant). The tiny risk of it perforating the uterus terrified the shit out of me. The risk of infection scared the shit out of me. I'd heard rumours that they can sometimes be felt by larger guys during sex. And the idea of having to check for the string every month gave me the heebies (not particularly logical, I know).
BUT if it was a choice between the copper IUD and the diaphragm (which it would have been if the specialist stuck to his ban on hormonal methods), I would have been going for the IUD. The failure rate for the diaphragm is scary!
Someone else just asked the same question and I answered him here:
http://www.lpsg.org/221508-large-size-condoms-a-boost.html#post3229130
I think the FDA is trying to protect the public from STDs.
But . . . but . . . if they don't make larger sizes available, they're condemning larger guys and anyone who has sex with them to being at a higher risk of STD exposure!