Originally posted by BuffMusicIdol@Apr 2 2005, 06:09 PM
I agree that the DIFFERENCES between us make us a work of art. There are beautiful small guys, and beautlful large guys. Conversely, there are ugly small and ugly large....[post=296237]Quoted post[/post]
Do you guys REALLY believe this? I know we all WANT to believe it, we think it is the RIGHT thing to believe, because none of us can help what we were dealt, etc. And no decent guy is going to say something cruel about another guy's endowment. But I wonder if not saying something bad is the same as saying something good. I don't think we're wired to think that way. Do our differences make us all a work of art? Do you think that, in general, small-hung guys are going to be as successful in relationships or as confident, or considered attractive or sexy or manly as frequently, as well-hung men?
I think Freddie's right when he says it must be much worse for really small men:
The sad fact is that our differences do NOT make us all a work of art. The small man knows that no one wants to be like him physically--and that can be crushing to live with, all for something completely beyond his control. He might be admirable in many other ways; but not in this deeply fundamental component of his manhood.Freddie53 Posted Apr 6 2005, 11:47 PM
And the poor adult guys with erections of less than three inches usually have a very serious complex...
I don't know. I hate the pain my unhung friend goes through. It's troubling, this "it's all good" stuff.