- Joined
- Nov 19, 2004
- Posts
- 5,842
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 2,611
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Memphis (Tennessee, United States)
- Gender
- Male
Actually the Kinsey Report that showed the average to be six inches in flawed. The reason is that in that report guys were asked to give the length of their penis. Some guys exaggerated. When nurses and doctors measured erect penises of "random' guys, the average was 5.1 in in one report and 5.5 inches in another.(Calling the average 5.6" or anything like that is only trying to boost my ego) If they were to see a 7.8" dick, it would be enormous compared to mine, but it still ain't 9".
The reason for the average being only 5.1 in. is that there are just as many men with a micro penis as there are with a penis 9 inches or more. Micro penises are penises that are three inches in length or less erect. Some would define micro penises at under four inches in length erect.
If we only measured the guys that volunteered for the measurement, it is unlikely that the guys with micro penises are going to volunteer. If asked they certainly are going to pad the number.
One medical report that I have lost the documentation for stated that a penis must be 1.6 inches in length to be functional in sexual intercourse. I have no clue how they arrived at that number.
There is a site that I just read. I am going to start a new thread referring to that site. What I remember reading is that there are just more guys in the very small size and also more guys in the very large size than most people are aware of. This is based on actual observation and not myth.
About the statement size doesn't matter. What the doctors mean is that size has no relationship to the ability for the guy to get a woman pregnant. Sperm count is the statistic important there. If a guy can shoot into the vagina and there is sperm in the semen, he can get her pregnant.
That has no bearing on whether the sex act was pleasant for either of them. Two totally different things.