Confusion about average size

[AlteredEgo]

Trolls unite.

You are a troll. You justmake incendiary posts and then can NEVER back up what you say when asked. You'd rather claim you don't have to or pretend you never meant to convey something. All you do is backpedal and lie; that is your post history.

 

[soren10]

You are a troll. You justmake incendiary posts and then can NEVER back up what you say when asked. You'd rather claim you don't have to or pretend you never meant to convey something. All you do is backpedal and lie; that is your post history.

And some who I don't want to mention flat out attack me. And yes you and others liked this attacks at times. You know who they are. Also the trolls unite is not directed at you.

 

[soren10]

Also you are American @AlteredEgo and you seem to know English. Check the synonyms real quick.

I found great synonyms for "accusing" on the new Thesaurus.com!

Tell me now that I'm not being personally attacked at times. I dare you.

 

[AlteredEgo]

And some who I don't want to mention flat out attack me.

Prove it. Don't you know how to link to an individual post without quoting it? You don't have to mention anyone. But no, you will just keep making excuses for why you cannot support your own claims as usual.

And yes you and others liked this attacks at times.

I often click "like" if an observation reads as true.

You know who they are.

Contrary to your apparent beliefs, I don't keep in my head a running tally of comments by which some particular person may have felt attacked, far less someone who spends more time on my ignore list than off!

Also the trolls unite is not directed at you.

I did understand that.

 

[AlteredEgo]

Also you are American @AlteredEgo and you seem to know English. Check the synonyms real quick.

I found great synonyms for "accusing" on the new Thesaurus.com!

Tell me now that I'm not being personally attacked at times. I dare you.

Context is everything. What you're doing here is exactly what I keep saying you always do. It's no different.

So, 'accusing' according to this thesaurus has as one of its synonyms the word 'attack'. Fine. That's true enough. The corresponding dictionary has a thorough list of definitions for 'attack'. In fact, it has 14 definitions.

attack: definition from Dictionary.com: the definition of attack

You are referring to the fourth usage. Is it personal? Not really. Even when I or other posters accuse you of doing that which you do, it is supported by and based upon your posts. That you feel these are personal attacks doesn't make it so. Your unwillingness to cite any specific example suggests that you know any examination of the context of these arguments with you would reveal justification for the unfavorable characterization of your posts, and perhaps you by extention.

 

[soren10]

Whatever you say. You are 200% right. When a certain someone told me " fuck you ". Yeah I believe that this was a personal insult and an attack. Funny thing is that this happened at the thread about a law in missisipy or something about women having the right to the their tubes. And what makes it even funnier is that my attacker is the one that liked your post. Oh the irony.

It's funny that posts that are directed at me get liked by the same group of 4 to 5 people. This says something for sure.

 

[AlteredEgo]

Whatever you say. You are 200% right. When a certain someone told me " fuck you ". Yeah I believe that this was a personal insult and an attack. Funny thing is that this happened at the thread about a law in missisipy or something about women having the right to the their tubes. And what makes it even funnier is that my attacker is the one that liked your post. Oh the irony.

It's funny that posts that are directed at me get liked by the same group of 4 to 5 people. This says something for sure.

I'm not saying no one ever says anything to you that is personal. I'm saying show it, so that those who might believe without consideration for context can see the context, and whether or not you are writing the whole truth. Is that the thread in which you were called a misogynist? You wrote some pretty misogynistic things in that thread. For example, you agreed that women should wait to receive a tubal ligation so that if they meet a man who wants to talk them into conceiving when they've already decided they never want to, that man, who they haven't yet met, can have an opportunity to convince her to bear children. If you don't know still that this line of reasoning is misogynistic, I feel sorry for you. But there's the context, and the context is the whole reason you won't support your claims that you are being personally attacked. Because, it may seem to you that it is personal, but when you write a lie and I call you out for it, declare that you're a liar, and show supporting evidence of my assertion using your own posts, though you may wish to whimper and claim you're under attack, I'm simply pointing out that your words are falsehoods. It is literally a denunciation of your words, first and foremost. And when you make a post that dehumanizes women, reducing them to cavities for the satisfaction of the needs of men they don't even know, and might never meet, how are those not the words of a misogynist? If you are being personally attacked, IF you are, how are you being blamed for anything other than your own words?

And just because you say @Fade wrote that, I should take your word for it, when you already know I think you lie? You make no sense, so are you also foolish? The chain of events:

• You make a claim
• You are asked to support that claim
• You refuse
• You are poked and prodded
• You claim you don't have to
• You are provoked
• You claim you would, but you don't wish to name names
• You are told how to do it without anyone being tagged or notified.
• You use a thesaurus instead of citing an example
• Your BS is brushed aside
• You name names, but still don't link to a concrete example

I'm bored. Aren't you?

 

[soren10]

I'm not saying no one ever says anything to you that is personal. I'm saying show it, so that those who might believe without consideration for context can see the context, and whether or not you are writing the whole truth. Is that the thread in which you were called a misogynist? You wrote some pretty misogynistic things in that thread. For example, you agreed that women should wait to receive a tubal ligation so that if they meet a man who wants to talk them into conceiving when they've already decided they never want to, that man, who they haven't yet met, can have an opportunity to convince her to bear children. If you don't know still that this line of reasoning is misogynistic, I feel sorry for you. But there's the context, and the context is the whole reason you won't support your claims that you are being personally attacked. Because, it may seem to you that it is personal, but when you write a lie and I call you out for it, declare that you're a liar, and show supporting evidence of my assertion using your own posts, though you may wish to whimper and claim you're under attack, I'm simply pointing out that your words are falsehoods. It is literally a denunciation of your words, first and foremost. And when you make a post that dehumanizes women, reducing them to cavities for the satisfaction of the needs of men they don't even know, and might never meet, how are those not the words of a misogynist? If you are being personally attacked, IF you are, how are you being blamed for anything other than your own words?

And just because you say @Fade wrote that, I should take your word for it, when you already know I think you lie? You make no sense, so are you also foolish? The chain of events:

• You make a claim
• You are asked to support that claim
• You refuse
• You are poked and prodded
• You claim you don't have to
• You are provoked
• You claim you would, but you don't wish to name names
• You are told how to do it without anyone being tagged or notified.
• You use a thesaurus instead of citing an example
• Your BS is brushed aside
• You name names, but still don't link to a concrete example

I'm bored. Aren't you?

Check my first post in that thread. I said that " in the end women are the one to choose for their bodies ". People ignored it and went along with their agenda against me. So there is F@cking That. They IGNORED it. So they can attack me. I won't give them the same courtesy to return to " fuck you " statement. All I said in that post is that women should think about it one more time and THEY twisted it how they see fit, they made me look like I was thinking of women to be stupid and that they don't know better and that men should choose for them, WHICH IS A BIG FAT LIE. I'm tired of them and their agenda/worldview. I'll follow the advice given above and just skim past the negative bullshit people post against me.

 

[AlteredEgo]

Check my first post in that thread. I said that " in the end women are the one to choose for their bodies ". People ignored it and went along with their agenda against me. So there is F@cking That. They IGNORED it. So they can attack me. I won't give them the same courtesy to return to " fuck you " statement. All I said in that post is that women should think about it one more time and THEY twisted it how they see fit, they made me look like I was thinking of women to be stupid and that they don't know better and that men should choose for them, WHICH IS A BIG FAT LIE. I'm tired of them and their agenda/worldview. I'll follow the advice given above and just skim past the negative bullshit people post against me.

No one ignored it. Not a single poster. What was said to you was that it doesn't matter that you think the final word still has to be hers if you also think she should wait to have that final word until she meets a man and discusses it with him first. And all you had to say for yourself was something like, "What's the worst thing that could happen if she just waits?" I still can't believe you don't realize how disgusting that is. It's gross. It's misogynistic. And you still aren't providing context. Link to a post if some said "fuck you" or shut up.

 

[soren10]

Fade did. It's right fucking there.

 

[soren10]

Post number 9 on here

https://www.lpsg.com/threads/mississippi-most-restrictive-abortion-laws-in-nation.500798/

Guess what you supported it. See what I mean. She ignored part if what i said and went along with her attack. HAPPY NOW ?

 

[AlteredEgo]

Post number 9 on here

https://www.lpsg.com/threads/mississippi-most-restrictive-abortion-laws-in-nation.500798/

Guess what you supported it. See what I mean. She ignored part if what i said and went along with her attack. HAPPY NOW ?

In the future, link directly to what you want someone to read. It looks like this.
Mississippi most restrictive abortion laws in nation

She is talking about your horrible, misogynistic post.

Mississippi most restrictive abortion laws in nation

How dare you defend this? You write that it's unfair to force her tubal ligation, inside her own body, onto a man she hasn't met, might not meet, perhaps doesn't even want to meet because he should be allowed to discuss this decision with her. You further go on to write that the worst thing that can happen to her is she has the surgery later. No, the worst thing that could happen to her is she has an unwanted pregnancy, as was pointed out to you in that thread. Moreover, again, no one ignored any part of what you wrote. You wrote that her imaginary, potential future male partner (without even knowing if she wants male partners) has the right to discuss this decision with her in the future, out of fairness to his say in the relationship, and that this outweighs her right to make this decision today. You say she needs to postpone the decision in order to protect his rights to have his say before she can make her decision. Yeah. We got that part. It's kind of the worst part.

And even that "fuck you" (which I still support and will put you back on ignore to prove it) is about your words. The context is, "fuck you for saying". But now who is ignoring what is actually written?

Choose your next words carefully. They will be the last I read before you go back on ignore.

 

[mr9lnch]

Also you are American @AlteredEgo and you seem to know English. Check the synonyms real quick.

I found great synonyms for "accusing" on the new Thesaurus.com!

Tell me now that I'm not being personally attacked at times. I dare you.

oh for christ sake SHADDUP Calimero

 

[soren10]

In the future, link directly to what you want someone to read. It looks like this.
Mississippi most restrictive abortion laws in nation

She is talking about your horrible, misogynistic post.

Mississippi most restrictive abortion laws in nation

How dare you defend this? You write that it's unfair to force her tubal ligation, inside her own body, onto a man she hasn't met, might not meet, perhaps doesn't even want to meet because he should be allowed to discuss this decision with her. You further go on to write that the worst thing that can happen to her is she has the surgery later. No, the worst thing that could happen to her is she has an unwanted pregnancy, as was pointed out to you in that thread. Moreover, again, no one ignored any part of what you wrote. You wrote that her imaginary, potential future male partner (without even knowing if she wants male partners) has the right to discuss this decision with her in the future, out of fairness to his say in the relationship, and that this outweighs her right to make this decision today. You say she needs to postpone the decision in order to protect his rights to have his say before she can make her decision. Yeah. We got that part. It's kind of the worst part.

And even that "fuck you" (which I still support and will put you back on ignore to prove it) is about your words. The context is, "fuck you for saying". But now who is ignoring what is actually written?

Choose your next words carefully. They will be the last I read before you go back on ignore.

i'll do something better not say anything. and get this thread back on track. how's that for an AE approved post..?

 

[693987]

Fade did. It's right fucking there.

You really just can't keep my name our of your mouth/can't keep your hands from typing it, can you? I've intentionally only directly interacted with you in very specific ways for a while now, only speaking about the topic in a couple of your threads. It would be nice if you extended the same courtesy, but no, your posts and behavior displayed in your posts is fucking obnoxious. You just keep running your fucking mouth.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

There are some. You probably have liked a couple yourself. I'm not gonna find them for You, I'm not obliged to do that. I have better things to do with my life to search and find , ignorant posts that made against me.

The old, "I don't have the time" copout. Yet you have time to respond about a dozen times while avoiding what was actually requested.

Save your precious time. PLEASE, do those things you deem better than posting here.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

In the future, link directly to what you want someone to read. It looks like this.
Mississippi most restrictive abortion laws in nation

She is talking about your horrible, misogynistic post.

Mississippi most restrictive abortion laws in nation

How dare you defend this? You write that it's unfair to force her tubal ligation, inside her own body, onto a man she hasn't met, might not meet, perhaps doesn't even want to meet because he should be allowed to discuss this decision with her. You further go on to write that the worst thing that can happen to her is she has the surgery later. No, the worst thing that could happen to her is she has an unwanted pregnancy, as was pointed out to you in that thread. Moreover, again, no one ignored any part of what you wrote. You wrote that her imaginary, potential future male partner (without even knowing if she wants male partners) has the right to discuss this decision with her in the future, out of fairness to his say in the relationship, and that this outweighs her right to make this decision today. You say she needs to postpone the decision in order to protect his rights to have his say before she can make her decision. Yeah. We got that part. It's kind of the worst part.

And even that "fuck you" (which I still support and will put you back on ignore to prove it) is about your words. The context is, "fuck you for saying". But now who is ignoring what is actually written?

Choose your next words carefully. They will be the last I read before you go back on ignore.

You stated it perfectly in the thread you linked here.

"This is your pattern. You say something sexist, ignorant, and stupid. You see it getting pointed out that your writing is such. Then you pretend your opinion is slightly different than what you say. You put yourself out there, and then when you face censure, you can't deal. Be a man, @soren10 . Own your errors. Don't pretend you never made them."

And to be clear, @soren10, that isn't a personal attack. It's an observation of what you write, not you personally.

However @soren10, you should consider that if you're identifying so closely with the negative opinions expressed about your writing, perhaps it's because these folks are NOT misunderstanding what you wrote, and that you actually are what they say you are.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

Check my first post in that thread. I said that " in the end women are the one to choose for their bodies ". People ignored it and went along with their agenda against me. So there is F@cking That. They IGNORED it. So they can attack me. I won't give them the same courtesy to return to " fuck you " statement. All I said in that post is that women should think about it one more time and THEY twisted it how they see fit, they made me look like I was thinking of women to be stupid and that they don't know better and that men should choose for them, WHICH IS A BIG FAT LIE. I'm tired of them and their agenda/worldview. I'll follow the advice given above and just skim past the negative bullshit people post against me.

You can't write a full paragraph of, "women should do what a man might want them to do, even if there is no such man in her life", then close with a contradiction like, " in the end women are the one to choose for their bodies", and expect everyone or anyone to understand this and NOT react negatively. Your closing statement completely contradicted your entire premise.

How is a woman supposed to follow this advice? You effectively stated she should wait for a man to decide whether they have children, but should do what she feels is right for her. Are you seriously incapable of seeing the complete contradiction?

It's like walking down a street in Chinatown screaming, "I hate Asians!" twelve times, then whispering, "I love Asians" once. Which opinion would you expect people to accept as yours?

 

[soren10]

we just agree to disagree on many things and how you and others interpret my posts. you ( global you ) can't be objective when posting , your life experiences and worldview always influence the posts you make. it's expected , some people want to vent at someone this place is a good place to do that given the chance. my biggest mistake is that i post to much and argue with people that are biased against me, there is NOTHING for me to win from doing that. i'll quote Wesley Snipes now " some motherfuckers always try to skate uphill ". i'll stop doing that. i can't prove that i'm not an elephant for some and it's fine. actually from now on i see no need to do that also. i'll make single posts, people want to twist my words and present them how they like , so be it. it's their opinion and their interpretation not mine.

as for the post i made in that thread. For me it's clear, take your ( potential ) loved ones opinions in to consideration but at the end do what you want and like. i stated it 1.000 times after that post. women want to get this surgery, they are free to do it. but i stand my ground the first post after that clearly ignored that part, ON PURPOSE.

 

[mr9lnch]

argue with people that are biased against you ?? for crying out loud, you think it's a conspiracy or something ?

EVERYONE agree on the fact you and your ineptitude is the root of every arguments.
cause just like most fucktards, you just can't cope with reality and have to bullshit your way to make it somewhat bearable to your butthurt feelings.
which, to people who have two brain cells to rub together and are able to apply any kind of logic, is a fuckin' insult to their intelligence.

here's the response you need to hear about every past, present, and future bullshit you will not miss to pull within the next couple days,

cry me a river, build a bridge on top, AND GET OVER IT and grow a freakin' pair.

again, when everyone have a problem with you, the problem is not them, IT'S YOU !