Not surprising how most of them are of the young super-spreader demographic that is both selfish and thinks themselves immortal.
Personally I am of the 60 something generation and so are my friends who agree that control measures in the Uk are becoming the problem, not the solution.
You might like to look up the results being producd by the Kings college phone app in the uK, which was 4 million people reporting if they are well. In the initial peak cases were pretty uniform across the country. Some indication it spread later to the north than the south and lasted longer there, but generally the pattern was pretty uniform.
The results now are very different. There is a gradient across the UK from lowest cases in the south to highest in the north. The best outcomes are in the SW, but all along the south coast south of London, though the effect extends further north.
The virus began in the south and arguably peaked in London before confinement to homes began. It hung on in the north despite lockdown. This argues there were other reasons why it declined faster in ths south, and the obvious one is that it had already peaked and immunity was preventing further spread.
The pattern of disease now also suggests the south has achieved significant levels of immunity sufficient to suppress the disease.
It makes no sense to impose added restriction, as government is arguing for right now, in places where the disease has already been beaten.
Sweden followed a policy of only applying controls which people could live with. they allowed spread and the number od cases has now fallen naturally as immunity has been achieved. They had fewer deaths, it cost less, there were less restrictions on everyone, and now they have immunity so it will die out naturally. The Uk has failed on all those scores by trying to suppress the virus.
