corrupt moderators at lpsg

SilverTrain

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Posts
4,623
Media
82
Likes
1,312
Points
333
Location
USA
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
There are a lot of different critiques I might toss out with respect to the moderation of this site......:tongue:..........

But, "corrupt"? Not one of them.
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
Awww! Where did you get a friend like that!?! I would like a friend like that! That is, of course, when you're done fucking me as you have been so instructed to do.
:shock: I had no idea I'd been instructed to fuck you, but I'm more than happy to oblige if your husband approves.

It will be my anniversary gift. :mischievous:

I lost my Box in this widescreen... Ok Maxcok, we will behave, put it back please. :(
I swear it wasn't me. I think it was Hick with his giant neon green type.
Somebody needs to fix page two. It's seriously fucked up.
Okay Mr. T, pass the fags around and then we'll go looking for your box.
 
Last edited:

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
Is there an eta on the fucking? I'm not sure whether to go back to sleep or hang around for the action.
I could send you an instant notification....

In the meantime, I'll keep myself amused by staring at Hickboy's enormous Aww. :cool:
....or I could hang out and amuse you in the meantime.

Tardis, max - I have a box you can borrow.
Would you like me to keep it warm until Tardis shows up? :smile:
 
Last edited:

curious_angel

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Posts
1,052
Media
18
Likes
34
Points
283
Location
England
Verification
View
Gender
Female
I could send you an instant notification....


....or I could hang out and amuse you in the meantime.

Would you like me to keep it warm until Tardis shows up? :smile:

Such efficiency max. :smile: I'd love to be on your "imminent max cock outings" mailing list.

Now come here, and let's amuse ourselves together.



All this early morning max-action, makes the text that woke me at 4.19am seem quite fortuitous.
You know who you are. I will have my revenge.:cool:
 
Last edited:

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
Such efficiency max. :smile: I'd love to be on your "imminent max cock outings" mailing list.

Now come here, and let's amuse ourselves together.
Here. What amusements shall we delight in first?

All this early morning max-action, makes the text that woke me at 4.19am seem quite fortuitous.
You know who you are. I will have my revenge.:cool:
hmm..... molto mysterioso......

Anyway, did someone mention Jello?
 
Last edited:

sexualnapalm

Experimental Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Posts
264
Media
25
Likes
4
Points
253
Location
Los Angeles
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Female
Thanks, sexualnapalm and Mr. T.

The cactus is strong, resilient, and lasts a very long time in the most challenging conditions.

Or was someone talking about my phallus?

Maxcok can needle me with his phallus anytime he'd like. That is, once curiousangel is done with him. I don't like to be rude and intrude. :biggrin1:
 

wallaboi

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 13, 2008
Posts
442
Media
33
Likes
250
Points
363
Location
Rainforest dweller
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I think corrupt is way too strong a word for this situation.

Headlines are not intended to be accurate... I think you know all about getting attention.

This thread is starting look like a homecoming

I know it's an American thing, but I've got no idea what a home coming is :confused:

I can assure you, all of you, that I did NOT report wallaboi's thread. When I pointed out to wallaboi that there was already a thread dedicated to his particular fascination, it was intended to help. There was a LOT of funny material in that old thread. He was offended, quite obviously, and attacked my (lack of) character. That's not a first for me, so I responded politely, and went on my way. I had no need to report him, he was (I thought) having fun. I have a rather rich ego, so people having fun at my expense isn't really a problem for me.

If you don't want to believe me, you don't have to. Still, I have no record of lying on this or any other forum. Take my word, or don't. That's up to you.

BTW, Hoss, who has a habit of randomly dredging up old threads, had posted on the OLD eggcorns thread between the time of the exchange between walla and myself, and the time it got merged. For a period of several hours they were directly atop each other in the forum. Corruption, or simply good house-keeping? I for one don't care, cuz it's REALLY not that big a deal, folks.

Apologies joytoyboy, if you were just trying to be helpful by pointing out that a similar thread had been posted before and enlightening me. Like I said, I did a search beforehand without any results. Yes, I do have quite a fascination with linguistics and the difference with my thread to the previous one, is that I am also interested in the subtle differences between eggcorns, mondagreens and malaproposims, which was never discussed in the previous thread.

What I do have an issue with is wannabe moderators who point out every single duplication of thread, spelling mistakes and don't contiribute anything to the conversation.

There are a lot of different critiques I might toss out with respect to the moderation of this site......:tongue:..........

But, "corrupt"? Not one of them.

As said before it was intended as a headline to get your attention....but yes, I was cut by this slight...please excue me this time for unleashing the inner drama queen.

ps. thanks to hickboy and trsgrl for the francis reference and link. Made me laugh and reminded me not to take things too seriously.
 

wallaboi

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 13, 2008
Posts
442
Media
33
Likes
250
Points
363
Location
Rainforest dweller
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Threads are merged, and there's a long-standing tradition of it here. See: http://www.lpsg.org/76415-thread-merge-on-aisle-three.html

It's less common today, but before Google really got a good footing, when you did a search, you had to try Alta-Vista, Yahoo, Lycos, etc., and they all gave different results.
a) The searches didn't give strong results
b) You had to look at numerous place to find what you were looking for

How is this related?
a) I agree that Rob does a great job with the site, but the search function here, has been a sore spot for ages. My habit for searching, is to find ONE of the most unique words, and search it. It became a habit because, previously, if you entered more than one word in the search box, it wasn't an AND search, or was an OR search. That it, adding more words didn't limit the search, it expanded the search, looking for all threads with EITHER of the items entered, not narrowing the result to posts with BOTH of the search terms.
b) If you want a real nightmare... Say you have a mad crush on Mario Lopez. You're looking for a pic of him, and you're sure that someone here must've posted before. Go to the Celeb forum and look for THE thread about him. Oh wait, there's not ONE, there are closer to 40 (or more), ditto with Julian Rios (although most of his are tough to find by title, because the thread titles are usually, "Can someone ID this guy?", so you get a ton of results that look totally unrelated, and have to dig into the thread to see that it's only a passing mention of him, or possibly that exact pic that you were looking for). In Information Management, the whole theory of access, is to provide one (or as few as possible) access point (just like Google, you search in one box, instead of 20 various sites), so that researchers can get to their info, instead of spending all of their time looking. By merging threads, sometimes with identical titles, and nearly verbatim questions, your search is going to give you better results (fewer threads to have to look through).

Reasons we don't merge threads: a) the duplicates haven't been noticed yet, b) they're different enough, or have a particular twist that verges from the other similar thread, c) this is a big one, merging the two together, for example, while they were running concurrently, would cause a convoluted, totally unreadable and jumbled mess.

Nice regurgitation or the company policy and I do appreciate the difficult job you guys have to do, but it seems you should weed out those amongst you who are unwilling or unable to maintain impartiality.