there was little-to-no sexual compatibility? Im not talking about sexual chemistry per se, as you can have one without the other, but Im sure theyre in the same vein. For example, if youre a person thats sexually very dominant/submissive, could you settle for being with someone that wasnt as sexually submissive/dominant as youd desire them to be? Youve got buttloads of chemistry, really get each others mojos goin, but got to settle with having sex in a way that doesnt completely fulfill you. Your partners just not that sexually adventurous, or just as dominant/submissive as you are, but for whatever the reason, theyre just not satisfying your desires and fantasies. Compromise and deal or give em the boot? Or, specifically in the case of homosexual couples, you and your partner both prefer the same sexual role (excluding vers.-types in this situation). You can compromise and take turns switching between roles, but would it be enough to keep you ultimately happy? With vers.-types, could you settle with being with a person thats strictly a top or a bottom? Kind of like bisexuals in that sense, choose one but have to forgo the other. Could you stay satiated? Or even people with major fetishes (leather, bondage, fur, etc.), can you date people who dont share the same or arent willing to at least fulfill your fetish? Basically, how much weight does sexual compatibility hold in a relationship [for you]? Can it make or break your relationships? If you choose to stick it out, is it because you believe sexuality is fluid, and your interests may eventually wean and wane so as to reflect those of your partners? Threads open to all genders and sexual orientations. Mostly directed at monogamists (open couples can just bring in a 3rd party to please certain cravings).