Your support of Lyndon LaRouche disqualifies you from any further consideration, and yes, your equivocation regarding his credibility leaves no doubt that you actually do believe that some of his views have merit.
This is my last contribution to this spam thread. I don't know why it took so long.
You've taken what I posted and twisted it to bolster your POV. I've already stated that
I do not agree with many of LR's viewpoints. It's incorrect as well as offensive, and I shouldn't have to defend myself against your attempt to pigeonhole me.
Just because I read about different subjects extensively doesn't mean that I support every bit of information that passes before my eyes. To do so goes against independent and critical thinking. Case in point- if you dislike me and I said that the sky was blue, would you disagree with me simply because you didn't like me?
I think that one needs to view facts from an
objective point of view. Yes, LaRouche has certain personality traits and opinions that many people find distasteful, but one cannot discount
all of his work without giving it any review simply because they don't like the way he thinks about certain things. That's not the way to conduct research.
