Cum constraining condom

Discussion in 'Sex With a Large Penis' started by Channelwood, Mar 13, 2008.

  1. Channelwood

    Channelwood New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Does anyone else experience this?

    I'm an average to below-average shooter for daily masturbation. (The ravages of time have decreased my payload over the years from fully adequate to "eh, could be more".) When I know I'll be having sex a day or so in advance I'll frequently check out some porn and edge for awhile to build up a bigger load, which always makes the first orgasm more pleasurable. I can always tell by the intensity of the full feeling in my loins whether it's going to be a regular load or a big load of cum.

    I find the following "problem". With a big load of cum, the condom seems to restrict the gushing outflow in a way that makes it significantly less pleasurable than without a condom. So, when I know that I have a really big load to shoot for the first orgasm in a session, I would much rather cum without a condom (oral, manual) than through intercourse (with mandatory condom). Fortunately, the GFWB is very accomodating and doesn't mind where I cum as long as she gets sufficient cock eventually, so I get to choose.

    Anyone else have preferential methods of cumming depending on load size or condom / no condom?
     
  2. pronatalist

    pronatalist Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,025
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    U.S.
    Well you are supposed to cum naturally, into the vagina, without any unnatural condom.

    Be properly married, and let the babies push out naturally as well.

    More and more people would be glad to live, human life was meant to spread.

    Humans weren't designed to use any means of "birth control" so of course it would feel best for the semen to gush out, without any restriction.
     
  3. Kauri Tree

    Kauri Tree Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    441
    Likes Received:
    68
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Everywhere
    Channelwood, I encounter similar problems ejeaculatiing with a condom on. I have a small dick and just an average cumload. Yet I feel constrained when I cum inside a rubber. Condom manufactures don't seem to realize that they need to make them with much larger semen receptacles. So what i do is I don't roll it up completely and try to leave a lot of extra room at the tip to allow for my cumload. Try that, see what happens.
     
  4. D_Duane Pipe

    D_Duane Pipe New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree. We weren't meant to have a condom on our penis. Take off the hat and let it blow freely.
     
  5. pronatalist

    pronatalist Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,025
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    U.S.
    It's not just that it would naturally feel better, but that the flow of human life should flow naturally unhindered as well.

    Condom constraining cum too much? Well don't use the unnatural condom then. Problem solved. Let it blow out freely into the vagina where it was meant to go. Of course pregnancies may occur, so that works best, with one's mate to whom they have properly married.

    How long have people been complaining that condoms dull sensitivity? Well don't use condoms then. Duh? Humans weren't designed to use "birth control." That's why they have problems with most every imaginable method, so they just keep coming out with an even more bewildering array of methods. People just don't get it.

    The "no method" method doesn't have all those side effects, and is the most natural and elegant. But then for some strange reason, some people are scared of natural pregnancies, and lump that in with undesirable side effects. Why? Which of our children, would we "return for a refund," if that was ever an option? I should think/hope, none of our precious children, would we care so little about as to still not want them, after the fact.

    The "quiverfull" people are onto something.
     
  6. bayonet

    bayonet New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    92
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Miami. FL
    Condoms were designed in a secret laboratory in hell.

    What I want to know is:

    Would Jesus wear a condom?
     
  7. pronatalist

    pronatalist Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,025
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    U.S.
    Maybe if the semen came out blasting, just blowing condoms off, people would get the message?

    BTW, anybody ever hear of it shooting that forcefully? That would be cool. Talk about a "love missle?"

    I have an amusing theory about a way that condoms can fail. Obviously, they can't be too tight, or they would squeeze all the blood out of an erection. And what do you need for a good reliable seal? A good tight fit. And condoms must be as thin as possible, lest people wouldn't use them. So what happens when a guy has a big load release, and the reservior tip "overflows?" Where's the surge going to go? Well condoms stretch easy, don't they, to fit most any penis of around that size? A little extra pressure of a slick fluid, and it shoots down the shaft of the penis. No wonder condoms slip off? And if condoms break, leak, slip off, why even use them? If pregnancy was going to occur anyway, why not get the natural enjoyment to go along with it?

    Some friend of mine, said the condom broke, she got pregnant, so he did the right thing and married her. Hmmm. Aren't you supposed to marry first? Some couple at Church seems to have gotten pregnant before they married, they married, and had a few more children since then. We had a "baby event" for their first baby, where guys are invited too. Of course they may have had those for their other babies when they came along, I just simply lost track or wasn't among the crowd to hear of the invite. I recall them saying something about how wonderful forgiveness is, God's grace, or something or other.
     
  8. pronatalist

    pronatalist Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,025
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    U.S.
    Condoms are unnatural, and seek to hinder the natural flow of human life.

    You got that right. For I saw it in a newspaper.

    A cartoon drawing showed the serpent (a common symbol for the devil), in the Garden of Eden, handing Eve, a condom.

    Yeah, sounds about right.

    Who else but the devil, would want to spoil their innocence?

    Think about the symbolism. A doctor or dentist or assistant, wears gloves, because they don't want whatever germs or disease you might have. They seek to "distance" themselves from you, as part of their professional manner. Appropriate there, but hardly "intimate." Should we really be "medicating" sex and "distancing" ourselves, when sex should be part of a person and their mate, bonding? That too is a reason for monogamy, as if one's partner brings in some nasty disease to the relationship, that's not very intimate or bonding or loving, either. In a proper relationship, nothing should be held back. The two should become "one flesh." Let love "overflow" and become babies, something else in common to reinforce the relationship.
     
  9. kman2000

    kman2000 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow. pronatalist (and others in this thread), you're all fucktards. What if you ARE married but aren't financially ready to support children yet? Wear a condom and chances are less. I think sex solely for the purpose of having children is just moronic (plus everyone would have 300 children). Plus, sex before marriage isn't necessarily a bad thing if done correctly (with someone you care for and respect). Condoms also protect against STDs, not JUST pregnancy. Yes, they may feel crappier than without, but they're a necessary evil. pronatalist, I'm sick of your uber-religious bullshit. Plus, your signature is the most ridiculous thing ever (plus you support it in your posts). That's the African model (and other places around the world). Have multiple children in the hopes that at least one will survive and have a good life. What a load of shit. I come from a family of 5 (two parents with three kids) and that's hard enough. Almost all of my clothes came from Goodwill etc., I definitely couldn't get all of the toys I wanted (and I didn't exactly ask for the moon), plus my parents had to attempt to raise three kids at once (which is a tough job) while still affording food and a house. I didn't have the worst life ever, not even close. But some families with 6 or more children -- holy crap. I don't think I could remember all of my kids' names if that were the case.

    Your attitudes come from the 19th century, clearly. Having responsible sex, whether married or not, is a good choice. And you telling people that they should just not use a condom is what's wrong with the world today -- that's why AIDS is such a problem (among other STIs) and why there are so many unwanted pregnancies, married or not. Get a life and learn something about the world around you. I can either use a condom and get a nice house with a high standard of living and then have kids when I'm ready or I can live in a box with my 18 kids. Which one am I going to choose?
     
  10. bayonet

    bayonet New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    92
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Miami. FL
    True lay techs despise latex.
     
  11. Jovial

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    2,404
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    CA
    To answer the OP's question: I agree with you. I find that the ring at the base is where the cum gets constrained. Magnum XL's are too long for me, so the extra is left as an unrolled ring at the base. This stops the cum from flowing freely. It's analogous to diastolic/systolic blood pressure. The peak cum pressure is enough to push it past the condom ring, but the lowest pressure between spurts isn't high enough to push past the ring. This considerably reduces the pleasure.

    I was only able to use TheyFit condoms a couple times before they went off the market. (Should be back soon!) Since you can get a custom length and girth, there is no unrolled ring at the bottom to restrict the cum flow. So they felt better, but like I said I only had a chance to test them a couple times.

    If I really need to be completely drained a good blowjob is necessary.
     
  12. pronatalist

    pronatalist Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,025
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    U.S.
    Men often don't like to use condoms. Could there perhaps be a few logical reasons, why?

    Oh wow, such creative name-calling. No respect for our beliefs, or witty observations?

    Then I would welcome children regardless. Why let the government rob us of even our children, by financial trickery? Don't you know what a sham our economy is, and how much it is rigged by communist or globalist under unconstitutional schemes as the Federal Reserve System of manufacturing "inflation" as one of the most unfair "taxes" against the poor? There's even a theory, that the income tax was designed to limit how much wealth Americans could accumulate, lest they become relaxed and let their families grow big, sending our population numbers presumably, through the roof. A population "control" conspiracy theory.

    There are critics of the trendy notion, that people should "wait a year" after gettting married, to have children. People are finding that they aren't near so fertile as they feared. Operation Rescue founder Randall Terry, I heard him some years ago, blasting away that notion, saying he was only able to have but one child biologically. He also adopted a child I think. But what if they hadn't of waited, but get busy right after marrying. He might have had another child.

    Why is it that the more money we seem to have, the less able people are to "afford" children? That tells me that people have their priorities mixed up. Sure, working a job and money are important these days, but they are co-resquites with having children, not pre-requisites. Thank God, that having children is for all married couples, not merely the elite rich who conveniently often don't want many children. I often think God gives so many children to the poor, because the "rich" don't want them. And yet would you sell your children for money? So the "poor" are often "richer" than the "rich."

    Author Mary Pride, says that in countries where "family planning" still is generally not used, that family size is typically around 5 or 6 children. I think that's a bit shy of 300 children. Compared to a smaller "planned" family of 3 or 4 children, I would much rather welcome a "bonus" child or two, than to have to bother with the burden of contraceptives and all their nasty side-effects. And then the "no method" method is the most natural and most elegant, and the most respective of human life and the most pro-life. BTW, I think I read somewhere that Mary Pride herself has 9 children.

    The Bible doesn't so trivialize marriage, and says to flee fornication, and thou shalt not commit adultery. If she's not your wife, could she be somebody else's future wife? But I do try to stay more to the philosophic issues, and not merely "preach a sermon." You can find sermons anywhere.

    Actually they don't. Taking a few more days to spread an STD, is not "safer" sex, it's not "safe," and rather it's promoting false security. Why do we have such a pandemic of STDs and AIDS? Because of all the promiscuity that "free love" contraceptive, fake, medicated sex, has naturally promoted, because contraception itself goes against nature. And how many ways do condoms fail, presumable the method that supposedly protects most, against STDs? They break, slip off, leak, or sometimes just don't even get used at all. Young people often use contraceptives incorrectly, and so-called "failure" rates are stated assuming "perfect" use, each and every time. And yet humans are so horny, that we insist upon having sex so frequently, as to provide numerous opportunites for "failure." That's a practical reason why I advocate relaxing more, and welcoming our babies to push out naturally. They say you can't stop people from having sex. Well sex=babies. So why don't they complete that idea? You can't stop people from having babies then. So why not explore how to adapt the planet to better accomodate and hold, lots more people?

    Having possibly many children, isn't just merely "religious," it's also in keeping with nature. Having many children isn't just "macho," but allows so many more fellow human beings to live. Why don't people consider the philosophy as well? I don't expect people to just copy my reasons, but to open their minds, and find their own reasons, to possibly relax and welcome their families to grow more naturally. Maybe some people just get fed up with the shoddy "birth control" "options" and decide to let their family size get a bit "out of hand" naturally? Look at all the pathetic excuses, and often rather good reasons. Some lady I once worked with, told me her boyfriend was "too big" to use a condom? Hmmm. Okay. Do we really think that's the reason? Maybe he doesn't know very well how they are sized, or they interfere with spontanity, or they dull sensation. Or maybe he just is too big? Hey, I don't know.

    Maybe your family didn't do so well, but some do better with many children. Clothes from Goodwill? Some of my clothes growing up, were used. I would buy used clothes now, if they were simply easier to buy. Properly grouped by patterns or size, but I spend almost nothing on clothes, as I no longer outgrow them, and I tend to wear and wear them, until worn out, like my Dad tended to have a closet full of clothes, somewhat out-of-date perhaps. I had some nice toys, grew up and got a job, and bought myself even better "toys." There's that old saying that "The difference between men and boys, is the price of their toys." Now I buy "toys" like a Sony Playstation 2, a fancy graphing calculator, computers, but no stupid "toy" computer iPods as I don't need my music so portable.

    I am quite sure that parents of more than 6 children, can remember all their children's names. That scene in Home Alone, where some neighbor kid is counted in the children's headcount, and so one of their children is left at home? That's movie nonsense, surely such rarely happens. Children "grow" on the parents, and they get used to having so many. Somehow in spite of our society no longer supporting or teaching people how to raise large families very well anymore.

    I believe families should relax and possibly grow naturally large, as even in nature, life tends to spread to fill most available niche.

    Did you ever think, that some of us, don't particularly like the declining social mores of the supposedly "modern" 20th century? I think quite a lot of the technology, isn't moving yet towards people soon colonizing more worlds, but at least for now, towards encouraging people to populate this one more densely and efficiently, and then maybe move on, later.

    Is our views of not using unnatural condoms, really so strange? Condoms aren't "sexy," even in porn. Sex is generally considered more natural and better, bareback, especially when children are desired rather than irrationally feared. I would rather "live in a box" with 18 children, than have a big empty, lonely house. But I was thinking more like 15 children, but then, I don't really think God would give me quite 15 children. I'm probably getting a bit old, to be capable even of siring so many children, well unless I marry a woman who already has 10 children?

    I am not at all impressed with the pathetic history of the development of contraceptives. It reeks of immorality, Nazi-like eugenics, the globalist anti-family population "control" educated moron theories, etc. It's like we are laboratory rats and they come up with all these nasty shoddy contraceptives to experiment on us. What's wrong with the beauty and elegance and naturalistic "no method" method of "family planning?" Whatever happened to babies happening when they happen?
     
  13. pronatalist

    pronatalist Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,025
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    U.S.
    Wow! So I am right, as I have never tried any condoms. Still not married, so no sex for me. The cum load can almost just blow the condom right off? Or it can leak way down at the edge of the condom. That's all the more reason to let it flow naturally into the vagina, and welcome families to grow possibly naturally large. Like people say, it feels better when the cum can flow without restriction. But babies rather like coming to life as well. And without the use of condoms, the issues of finding proper fit, are so much simpler.
     
  14. kman2000

    kman2000 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Man, you must waste a lot of time coming up with this shit. Half of the stuff I'm not going to dignify with a response as its so out there and ridiculous that it's not worth my time (plus I don't want to spend 3 hours writing a response). I will mention a few things though. First, I guess sarcasm doesn't come across well on the Internet and for that I do apologize, but although most of my arguments were serious there were some things that were exaggerated (I'm a very sarcastic person) and, even though I don't think (well, I hope anyway) that you thought I was being 100% serious, you certainly wrote about them that way. 300 children was a joke. Seriously, no woman could have 300 children. Maybe possible for an incredibly promiscuous male, but unlikely anyway.

    Your arguments about the "natural" way are really fractured. First of all, a lot more is natural than you think it is (and I'm not talking about condoms here). Since I know you're a religious buff, I'll bet you don't think too kindly on the gay lifestyle. But there ARE gay animals, not influenced by humans in any way shape or form. Seriously, many animals commit "homosexual" acts (look it up). Since we didn't do anything about it, I guess this means it's "natural" too, right?

    Your conspiracy theory attitude just confirms what I suspected -- you are indeed off your nut. But then again so is everybody sometimes (and I'm most certainly not saying the government isn't corrupt, just that the extent of corruption and mind-control probably isn't at the level that some people think it is).

    I think you know my views on the bible, so that argument has no bearing on anything. You never spoke about the creation of the bible and the selection of divine writings by a committee in the other religious-crazy thread, and I'd be interested in how you can still believe every word of the Bible.

    I also should clarify that I don't think my life was crappy or anything at all having siblings even though I may have made it seem that way (I actually want 3 kids when I get married, although if we had a "bonus" or two I would absolutely love them too -- I'm not saying I would murder any further children or that I wouldn't love them, just that I think there is such a thing as too many children).

    Another point -- this is the 21st century, not the 20th. It just brings a level of understanding about how ridiculous most of your other arguments are -- and confirms that you are at least a century behind.

    A final point -- although you may enjoy living in a box with your 18 kids (sorry, 15), I'm sure your kids would at least resent you for having so many kids in some way. I mean, their life would be 10 times more difficult than other kids. And although this may be character-building, they may not be able to 'land on their feet' as well as some other kids (how are they going to pay for college? -- and if you say they should pay for it themselves, you should realize that it's quite impossible sometimes, since tuition fees are 10 times what they were in my parents' generation while minimum wage has only increased 2 times, plus many people are not eligible for government-funding because their parents make too much money -- even if they aren't willing to pay a dime).

    Enjoy.
     
  15. Channelwood

    Channelwood New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    My question was a physiological one, not a philosophical one. I'd really like to hear answers and discussion on my original topic, so those who've strayed from the OP please have the courtesy to go form a new thread and carry on your discussion there.
     
  16. kman2000

    kman2000 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry Channelwood -- I was really just trying to counter pronatalist's side of things (particularly because he gave advice not to use a condom instead of helping you out), but I did go off-topic. I apologize.
     
  17. SpeedoMike

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,940
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Don't you mean "what condom would Jesus wear?" :ponder:
     
  18. thikcok

    thikcok Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    77
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    87
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London
    Oh my God....
    Are KMAN and I the only sane, responsible, caring adults on this site??

    I absolutely cannot BELIEVE that I am living in a World where people with thoughts like those of Pronatalist actually exist. Where have they been? Are they completely blinkered?

    Do you KNOW how many children have AIDS in Africa? Do you KNOW how many adults have AIDS or are HIV+ in this country? Do you KNOW how many unwanted pregnancies there are?.. how many abortions there are?

    Thankfully I am completely healthy... I wish to stay that way... I wish my partners to stay that way... so I practise safe sex ALWAYS.

    No wonder cases of STIs/STDs are on a huge upward spiral in the UK while there are people around who think they can just fuck and take absolutely no responsibilty for the consequences.
    One day Pronatalist ,& others with the same view, will have a very big shock.... probably when they are in the queue at a clinic.
     
  19. uncut1234

    uncut1234 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,759
    Likes Received:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    new jersey
    thats funny.. i do the exact opposite, if i know im having sex tomorow, ill make sure i cum tonight, and tomorow, sometimes ill even cum in the shower right before hangin out with a chick so i know im gona loast alot longer.. not really worred about volume, no matter what, if a girl is present, it always explodes, id worry more about lasting long and pleasuring her than about a few extra squirts of cum, when most girls dont even likeit anyway! lol
     
  20. D_Ollyvalle Treegirth

    D_Ollyvalle Treegirth Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2008
    Messages:
    559
    Likes Received:
    15
    what about gay guys? May we use condoms?

     
Draft saved Draft deleted