Wow Andy, it takes talent to piss people off in more than two simultaneous threads! Are you going for the high score?
There is naturally a connotation for tops (dominants in anal sex) to be masculine, and for bottoms (submissives in anal sex) to be feminine. Afterall, the penetrator is widely purported to be the "man" and the penetratee the "woman". It makes sense why people would believe that, and I don't blame you for feeling that way. But while some have the top-bottom status, others switch and recipocrate the favor, so the classifications become naturally complex in those situations.
You can bash anal too, as it's not necessarily homophobic (though I say "Don't dog it 'till you try it."). After all, plenty of men enjoy anal with women and plenty of women enjoy recieving it. If done responsibly, no disease or damage occurs.
It's not as though AIDS suddenly materializes if a penis enters an anus. It's a contagion, and like most diseases is spread from people carrying the virus or bacterium that causes it. If you want anal without AIDS, use a rubber and choose partners wisely -- simple. FYI, you can also get AIDS from vaginal intercourse with an infected person just as well.
My point being, your views aren't completely justified without experience or factual information to recount from. Also, I'm curious as to where and why you read about the plots of gay porn flims...:biggrin1:.