swinglow: Do you women enoy a cut or uncut dick? More or less foreskin? Please compare your experiences if you have had both.
melinda: I didnt get in on this one last time it came around...so I will give my two cents. I will say that although I love all cocks, I do like the look of a cut cock better. i dont know if the sex has felt any different though between the two.
Vigilante: I simply don't see how a cut would look better...it has a scar and it's all...mutilated, sickening to me but owell
melinda: I have never really seen the scar that you speak of. obviously it is missing the foreskin, but I love the look of a cock-head, without having to pull back a sheath of skin to find it.
- jonb,
Circumcised penises always looked like a clown nose to me. LOL
Seriously, though, there are complications which can arise as a result of circumcision. In fact, apparently 35% of cases involve hemorrhage, mainly just oozing, but a baby only has 300 mL of blood. Phimosis occurs in 2.9% of circumcised boys, two-thirds of those with the penis buried under the mons pubis. (Since the misdiagnosis of "phimosis" is a common reason for circumcision, isn't it ironic? Don't you think?) Removal of too much skin can cause a hairy shaft or webbing from the scrotum.
It gets even worse: The foreskin prevents the re-entry of urine in infants as well, so ammonia from stale urine can create an ulcer. (31%) This can lead to a stenosis (narrowing) of the urethra, which occurs in 8% of circumcisions. This can cause kidney failure if untreated. The circumcised penis can get infected fairly easily too, just like any wound near an excretory duct: Everything from staph to gangrene. Neuromas also show up. The urethra can be blocked altogether. (1.8%) The penis may even be removed altogether, as was the case of John/Joan. It can cause oxygen depravation, brain damage, or even death.
All that for a cosmetic surgery. On babies. On an organ which isn't even seen that much. And people wonder why I have such a deMausean view of American culture.
Seriously, though, there are complications which can arise as a result of circumcision. In fact, apparently 35% of cases involve hemorrhage, mainly just oozing, but a baby only has 300 mL of blood. Phimosis occurs in 2.9% of circumcised boys, two-thirds of those with the penis buried under the mons pubis. (Since the misdiagnosis of "phimosis" is a common reason for circumcision, isn't it ironic? Don't you think?) Removal of too much skin can cause a hairy shaft or webbing from the scrotum.
It gets even worse: The foreskin prevents the re-entry of urine in infants as well, so ammonia from stale urine can create an ulcer. (31%) This can lead to a stenosis (narrowing) of the urethra, which occurs in 8% of circumcisions. This can cause kidney failure if untreated. The circumcised penis can get infected fairly easily too, just like any wound near an excretory duct: Everything from staph to gangrene. Neuromas also show up. The urethra can be blocked altogether. (1.8%) The penis may even be removed altogether, as was the case of John/Joan. It can cause oxygen depravation, brain damage, or even death.
All that for a cosmetic surgery. On babies. On an organ which isn't even seen that much. And people wonder why I have such a deMausean view of American culture.
Simon9: The question isn't about whether babies should or shouldn't be circ'ed. It's about what the women here prefer for their partners.
Tender: as far as I'm concerned its a rights issue.
he has the right to keep it, its his.
no mommy should have the right to cut it.
it should be HIS choice when HE is old enough to decide...
Tender
he has the right to keep it, its his.
no mommy should have the right to cut it.
it should be HIS choice when HE is old enough to decide...
Tender
grantstephens: I know this wasn't the initial intent of this post, but I wish I was uncut as a baby. When I read about how sensitive an uncut dick is compared to a cut - I am envious. I didn't realize this until recently, and I now regret having my 2 boys cut. I'll apologise to them when they're older.
I did read an article about a year or so ago that stated that women orgams easier from an uncut penis. Has something to do with the extra skin - I wouldn't know becasue I don't have that extra skin to work with.
I did read an article about a year or so ago that stated that women orgams easier from an uncut penis. Has something to do with the extra skin - I wouldn't know becasue I don't have that extra skin to work with.
[quote author=Vigilante link=board=women;num=1080332091;start=0#3 date=03/28/04 at 03:19:18]
"I simply don't see how a cut would look better...it has a scar and it's all...mutilated..."
[/quote]
Some men (myself) fortunately do not have strong evidences of a "scar" while still others DO have very obvious "tell-tale" evidences of their circumcisions....(i.e. different pigmentation beneath the glans area on the shaft or even a darker "ring-like" effect.) From what I understand in my reading, the "scarring" is a result of whichever particular "approach" is used in the circumcision procedure itself--such as certain clamping devices (and, there are several if not more than several including various "techniques", etc.). Also, the skill of the MD to some degree, perhaps, --who knows. With the variety of "looks" out there for cut men, it reminds me of a form of cruel "gambling" as to how a fella indeed will turn out from such a venture... mostly forced upon him by others--which gets me mighty close to getting back on my soapbox again ...taking my stand on circumcision. (which I won't today!)
Let's just say I "side" very strongly with Tender, smallblock, and grantstephens in their views expressed.
-------
Of course, there is such a thing as a "partial circumcision" (called a "dorsal slit") whereby much less foreskin is bothered at all and in fact, quite a lot of it is left! THAT would be "my answer" for any male needing some legitimate corrective measure, say for "health-related" reasons. But, that's about as far as I would go though, for ANY foreskin-whacking.
"I simply don't see how a cut would look better...it has a scar and it's all...mutilated..."
[/quote]
Some men (myself) fortunately do not have strong evidences of a "scar" while still others DO have very obvious "tell-tale" evidences of their circumcisions....(i.e. different pigmentation beneath the glans area on the shaft or even a darker "ring-like" effect.) From what I understand in my reading, the "scarring" is a result of whichever particular "approach" is used in the circumcision procedure itself--such as certain clamping devices (and, there are several if not more than several including various "techniques", etc.). Also, the skill of the MD to some degree, perhaps, --who knows. With the variety of "looks" out there for cut men, it reminds me of a form of cruel "gambling" as to how a fella indeed will turn out from such a venture... mostly forced upon him by others--which gets me mighty close to getting back on my soapbox again ...taking my stand on circumcision. (which I won't today!)
Let's just say I "side" very strongly with Tender, smallblock, and grantstephens in their views expressed.
-------
Of course, there is such a thing as a "partial circumcision" (called a "dorsal slit") whereby much less foreskin is bothered at all and in fact, quite a lot of it is left! THAT would be "my answer" for any male needing some legitimate corrective measure, say for "health-related" reasons. But, that's about as far as I would go though, for ANY foreskin-whacking.
[quote author=jonb link=board=women;num=1080332091;start=0#11 date=04/03/04 at 16:25:38]
"And very strongly with me, then? I posted various complications from it, after all...."
[/quote]
You bet, Jonb!
---Certainly didn't mean to slight you.
But, what you've brought up though--the complications and now the "fetish" stuff....well it just conjures up yet other notions in my mind about all this "cutting" biz--
How about "unconscionable", "reprehensible", totally unforgiveable....
How's THAT?
"And very strongly with me, then? I posted various complications from it, after all...."
[/quote]
You bet, Jonb!
---Certainly didn't mean to slight you.But, what you've brought up though--the complications and now the "fetish" stuff....well it just conjures up yet other notions in my mind about all this "cutting" biz--
How about "unconscionable", "reprehensible", totally unforgiveable....
How's THAT
?Vigilante: Catholics have their kids circumsized, and the catholic church chooses not to allow punishment for molestation...Their is something amiss but I simply can't put my finger on it, maybe cause It's an idea but then again...
[quote author=Vigilante link=board=women;num=1080332091;start=0#14 date=04/09/04 at 16:47:03]Catholics have their kids circumsized, and the catholic church chooses not to allow punishment for molestation...Their is something amiss but I simply can't put my finger on it, maybe cause It's an idea but then again...[/quote]
The "something amiss" is that, in fact, the Roman Catholic Church doesn't advocate circumcision at all. By some interpretations it's considered mutilation, and therefore immoral. There are some Catholics who derive the importance of circumcision from Abraham -- as Jews do -- but it's not universal by any means. It's not practiced often at all in Italy, France, Spain, or Ireland, which are all heavily-Catholic countries. The circumcision of gentile American infants is very common, but not for religious reasons.
Your point on molestation is well taken, though.
The "something amiss" is that, in fact, the Roman Catholic Church doesn't advocate circumcision at all. By some interpretations it's considered mutilation, and therefore immoral. There are some Catholics who derive the importance of circumcision from Abraham -- as Jews do -- but it's not universal by any means. It's not practiced often at all in Italy, France, Spain, or Ireland, which are all heavily-Catholic countries. The circumcision of gentile American infants is very common, but not for religious reasons.
Your point on molestation is well taken, though.
i prefer a cut cock for many reasons, looks , better in bed ,ect, have had the chance to have both in bed and the cut ones are better to me, uncut was ok but the cut cocks just seem to do it for me sexual.
Similar threads
