Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Sex With a Large Penis' started by D_Lamberte Lingusdangle, Feb 6, 2008.
Who seems to have the edge on size Cut Uncut larger
When you cut bits off something it always gets smaller.
This one should stir things up..
Only because you are trolling. What a stupid question.
I really like the big uncut ones, they seem to just be a bit bigger so to speek
Uncut cocks seem thicker, sexier!
oh fuck! Please. The skin on the outside has NOTHING to do with it..... Size was determined 9 months before a scalpel could have possibly encountered that little piece of skin
LOL @ this thread.
Circumcision does affect penis size, but only an average of 8mm (erected length) is lost...unless something goes wrong.
What is lost after circumcision?
What is lost after circumcision?
The above would be sobering reading to those new to circumcision topics.
The page mentioned the Richters et al study. Here's the abstract from that study:Abstract:- "As part of a study investigating the adequacy of the Australian Standard for latex condoms, we arranged for self-measurement of the erect penis by a volunteer sample of 156 men, predominantly Caucasian. The kits contained illustrated instructions and paper tapes which the respondents mailed back to us marked with creases to indicate their dimensions. Mean penile length was 16.0 cm (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.2-19.8 cm) and circumferences were: base 13.5 cm (95%CI 0.7-16.2); shaft just below coronal ridge 12.4 cm (95%CI=10.0-14.8); glans 11.9 cm (95%CI 9.6-14.2). Repeat measurements of 15 men showed intraclass correlations (r) of 0.90 for length, 0.68 for base circumference, 0.87 behind ridge and 0.87 glans. Non-users of condoms were more likely to have narrower penises. In a subsample of 66 men who reported on perceived condom comfort, men with wider penises (base circumference) were more likely to find condoms too tight. Men with longer penises were more likely to complain that condoms were too short. Circumcised men had shorter erect penises than (p<0.05). The paper recommends that the measurement technique described in this study should be applied to other populations, and that condoms should be manufactured and marketed in a wider range of lengths and widths."
The bottom line: An inadvertent finding was that cut penises average ~3/8in less than intact penises.
uncut seem to be bigger...
Uncut seems thicker 2 me
Just from looking around, it seems like the uncut guys tend to look "fuller" but not necessarily bigger. Then again, I think I am more of a fan of uncut, I like the look and that's why I'm restoring.
cut guys have always been bigger as well as had a much thicker cock than the uncut guys ive had sex with. doesnt mean uncuts have small cocks. just saying the cut guys have always been much larger than uncut have. so to me cut cocks are bigger than uncut ones are.
Uncut is almost always bigger, cutting something usually makes it smaller, but of course it depends on the guy.
Size and whether or not the cock is cut are totally unrelated.
Although, I have noticed a higher percentage of large uncut guys in porn compared to the actual percentage of uncut guys in America.
Well im uncut, and above average. not shur why it would make a difference about size unless they did a bad job and you had scar tissue or sompthing.
There is a train of thought that cut men are more apt to go for kinker sex. In replies?, opinion?
Uncuts flaccid and erect seem to appear somewhat longer than the circed. The loose slippery hanging skin on the uncuts probably accounts for maybe 1 half inch difference.
because, of course, you don"t have an axe to grind..