I'll admit, I wasn't listening. I was reading the words though. Not out loud.
Besides, who doesn't gush over baby pandas? Wouldn't that make just about everyone a "cute" person?
I dont. I know plenty of people who wouldn't care if baby pandas exploded on a television show documented via some recording device to be placed upon YouTube. Matter of fact, I'm sure numerous individuals laughed at bits comprable to this in shows like Robot Chicken or Family Guy. However, I do find them cute.
You're telling me what I think instead of hearing that I don't like the WORD handsome...
Why do you think I am telling you what you think? Could you please direct me to such an occasion. If I did, I would be willing to apologize, because my intentions weren't to assume understanding of the inner-workings of your mind.
...so I don't use it, and that the word cute doesn't mean to me what it means to you. Most people I know wouldn't say, "I just saw a handsome man walking down the street" they would say, "I just saw a cute guy walking down the street." I think it's more commonly used.
I'd say you're correct. More people do use the word cute. I thought I already addressed that issue in the portion where I directed the OP to context clues. My bad.
Words have more than one meaning. The person who looks at a hot woman and says "Damn!" to indicate that she's hot doesn't mean the same thing when he accidentally flushes his winning lottery ticket down the toilet and says, "Damn!" Although I can see from your explanation that you would extrapolate that the second man actually got aroused.
Presumptuous.
The OP asked for each individual's opinion and I've given mine. You're trying to tell me that I don't mean what I said I mean because I would use the word cute to describe a baby panda. That makes as much sense as trying to reason that I actually also want to have sex with baby pandas.
I am aware of what you meant. What I think you aren't understanding is what you meant isn't going to always be understood. The very topic we are threading within was born from the confusion formulated between motives and actualities. The issue the OP seems to have is with the disparity between "prescriptive dictionary definitions" and actual American colloquial usage. In presenting the former and seperating them from their subjects, I was not inferring you wouldn't have a sexual appetite for someone whom was "cute" due to the fact it's associated with panda bears & stuffed animals.
What I am saying is cute is a soft word. Who wants to fuck the cute person? Maybe you. Maybe her. Maybe a boat load of girls. But I think there is a a degree of difference between cute and handsome in common use, and handsome would be higher on the attractiveness scale.
I was not questioning your motives, but your execution. Handsome is a sparsely used multi-syllabic word in our modern, fast, economical, global world. In the same way "gorgeous" or "marvelous" are becoming more unnecessary for conversational speech - they are rich words. Why over-work our mouths or fingers for all those letters when cute can do the job? Of course, cute could be said sarcastically. Also, there are the occasions when cute could very well be as attractive as a baby panda; something you wouldn't fuck, but fucking adorable as hell.
But either way, I think you're in the right. You're the woman here. He did post this in the Women's Issue section. Your POV overrules my own. Continue.
Sidenote: I don't see why you wouldn't have sex with a panda. They are going extinct. They need to love. Shows how much you care about things that are cute.