Damn they are cleaning house

[ManlyBanisters]

I don't see how any of my whole three posts warrant this kind of reaction. Is it cos I is a noob?

nope - it is because you made a first post relating to happenings on the board from before (allegedly) you got here - you said:

Good riddance to fake rubbish :biggrin1:

Why would you know or care about a banned member when you have only been here (at that stage) 2 days?

I'm not the only one whose whiskers are twitching either - in chat you've been coming across as a little too familiar with goings on for an alledged n00b as well. If you are a genuine n00b then you have nothing to worry about and won't feel the need to keep protesting your innocence now, will you? :smile:

I'm going to drop this and leave MR's thread to its original purpose.

 

[B_InternalExplorer8]

Yes so:

"Good riddance to fake rubbish" is going out of my way to cause issues?

Compared to the essays other posters have written about Monster. And I'm sure if I were a ghost member, the Moderators would know. Also from what I gather all or most of the recent bannings were AMERICANS.

As has already been said I am not in AMERICA. My only issue is that a lot of you are anti-noob and seem to look for conspiracy and drama where there is none. Especially Manly Banisters. Who construed an incredible amount of paranoid bullshit from a five word sentence.

PS LPSG's chat room is not the only one nor the only one of its kind (Java) on the internet.

 

[ManlyBanisters]

Well excuse me!

 

[D_Clumbert Cocksicle]

Right, nobody seem to notice his bad side. He was a booger sometimes. Don't fall for his flattery, he was one of those members who would get on your good-side just to use you later on to support that he was real.

 

[2322]

Yes so:

"Good riddance to fake rubbish" is going out of my way to cause issues?

Yes. Imagine you're invited to the home of someone you don't know well and who don't know you at all and then the first thing out of your mouth is an opinion about a guest everyone else knows very well. Your opinion comes is interpreted as baseless simply because it sounds so patronizing due to your unfamiliarity with the subject in question.

Compared to the essays other posters have written about Monster. And I'm sure if I were a ghost member, the Moderators would know. Also from what I gather all or most of the recent bannings were AMERICANS.

No they wouldn't know. Subverting the system is fairly easy with just a little effort.

As has already been said I am not in AMERICA. My only issue is that a lot of you are anti-noob and seem to look for conspiracy and drama where there is none. Especially Manly Banisters. Who construed an incredible amount of paranoid bullshit from a five word sentence.

And you're certain of this how? Here you're a new member reading posts from many long-term members and it doesn't cross your mind that perhaps they might have some basis in history for their skepticism? You also have nothing other than second-hand experience of this member, never having interacted with him personally, and yet you're very positive that he's, "fake rubbish."

PS LPSG's chat room is not the only one nor the only one of its kind (Java) on the internet.

Good of you to notice.

 

[B_InternalExplorer8]

No they wouldn't know. Subverting the system is fairly easy with just a little effort.


And you're certain of this how? Here you're a new member reading posts from many long-term members and it doesn't cross your mind that perhaps they might have some basis in history for their skepticism? You also have nothing other than second-hand experience of this member, never having interacted with him personally, and yet you're very positive that he's, "fake rubbish."

Yes because it is so easy to be posting from America yet have an IP address that is localised to a country in the UK.

I'm not even an expert but I expect that's impossible.

And I'm sorry, master. I won't read posts by any long term members and I shall never form an opinion on anything I read ever again. You put me in my place. Well done you.

Sincerely

1BIGG1 :tongue:

 

[swordfishME]

Hello.

Just posting to see if I can still do so. :smile:

 

[Mr. Snakey]

Yes. Imagine you're invited to the home of someone you don't know well and who don't know you at all and then the first thing out of your mouth is an opinion about a guest everyone else knows very well. Your opinion comes is interpreted as baseless simply because it sounds so patronizing due to your unfamiliarity with the subject in question.



No they wouldn't know. Subverting the system is fairly easy with just a little effort.



And you're certain of this how? Here you're a new member reading posts from many long-term members and it doesn't cross your mind that perhaps they might have some basis in history for their skepticism? You also have nothing other than second-hand experience of this member, never having interacted with him personally, and yet you're very positive that he's, "fake rubbish."



Good of you to notice.

A very good point you make. Please for someone who is new. Take the time to get to know someone before you judge who they are by a few posts. Some senior members have been treated rather unfairly lately.:smile:

 

[ballsaplenty2156]

i actually felt a bit embarassed for monster as he continued to post flaunting his sex appeal when everyone already figured out he a fake long long ago. he kinda looked foolish most the time he was here. the sad part was he actually belived people took him seriously.

I agree wholeheartedly. When I first joined this site, I thought MONSTER was for real, but it didn't take but a week or two before I realized this was a dude with some serious psychological issues. I read some of his remarks to other members and thought how cruel and even crude he was.
Then, I made the mistake of voicing my support for sleazeball666, in an argument. That night I received about a half dozen nasty and vicious pm's from MONSTER. Really threatening stuff.
There was some back and forth between us as I'm not a person who takes being threatened very lightly, but I realized he was trying to get me to go over the top and end up breaking the rules in here.
I put him on IGNORE, and never dealt with him again. I felt bad the sleazeball666 did not heed my advice and ignore MONSTER, it ended up getting him banned. Monster gloated about that for a while in some of his postings.
He was/is a truly pathetic human being. A liar and a poser. What a way to represent yourself.
I never could understand his fan base on here, but then I don't really have to. He was never a nice guy in my opinion. He talked down to many people,
was cruel with his remarks and not particularly bright in most conversations.
Adios, MONSTER....I for one will not miss you. It was too long in coming.
You cost this website far too many decent people.

 

[B_Nick8]

[Quoting me, novice said...]
I love you, and almost wet myself on that one. :rofl:

See comment for Nick8 above. :wink: HEY! Wait a minute!!! Has Jeff Black come back as someone new??? :tongue:

I love you, too, novice, and you know that, but geezusgod, are you starting a rumor that Jeff Black and I are the same person? There goes my lily white rep.



FYI, boys and girls, somewhere in cyberspace, and possibly here as well, monster is both seething and wetting himself over this thread. Just sayin'.

 

[Gillette]

Gillette, think of it as a government meeting held behind closed doors. Anytime people in power in any organization meet behind closed doors with the power to do as they please, people are suspicious. It doesn't matter if it's LPSG or a big corporation or the Privy Council of Monaco. It's just how things are. People will see the results then fill-in the blanks trying to piece together just what happened. Because it all takes place in secret and what occurs directly affects them, people will feel offended that they weren't trusted with the information and tend to fill the blanks the more sinister of theories.

I understand all that. For the most part it doesn't bother me and I try to help smooth the issues out where I can. You mention government and it's an apt comparison. Please forgive me for losing my cool sometimes. I've had Chretien and Trudeau as governmental examples.

He was a booger sometimes.

It has been so long since I've heard that insult used that I had to smile.:smile:

Sincerely

1BIGG1 :tongue:

Shall I take that as an admission?

Then, I made the mistake of voicing my support for sleazeball666, in an argument. That night I received about a half dozen nasty and vicious pm's from MONSTER. Really threatening stuff.
There was some back and forth between us as I'm not a person who takes being threatened very lightly, but I realized he was trying to get me to go over the top and end up breaking the rules in here.
I put him on IGNORE, and never dealt with him again.

I'm glad you figured out the best way to deal with it. I'm quoting your post to emphasize with one specific issue for everyone else.

PMs.

Do not suffer harassment in PMs, people. If someone is using PM to threaten or intimidate you report and forward the PMs immediately. When patterns of behavior are established it does get dealt with.

I'm a right royal bitch when it comes to harassment issues. Trust me on that much.

 

[rbkwp]

Joined before me,similar amount of posts...similar amount of reading of,prior to posting. -different outlook.. on a fellow member,who had been on site since......Dec 2005 with ..4.000 * posts to his credit

Gerom6
Actually I am happy that he is banned. Though I have not contributed much to this site, I have however viewed virtually every post on this site, and I have found that monster has been a great poster (in terms of compliments and flattery) but a really bad person as he never once proved that he was himself.

Please dont take this as an attack on your opinion Gerom6,just using your post to illustrate a point.

I ask you,did you read Monsters earlier posts where he like most of us newbies,asked genuine questions perhaps supported others, (i dont recall-not totally into analyzing all and sundry on here.)
Dont you think a fellow member perhaps especially the long term members deserve some respect,they have earnt there credibility,surely.
He chose not to validate himself (you know of choice,.. you have the right to choose etc..)
I dont think you can state he was lying to himself/and all other people who complimented the images....it was there choice to do so,and if they believed it was him/or not,if it was there fantasy to believe, well there choice..surely)
Do you think any person would could become jaded' after an amount of time on here.?
(as in SICK' of being called a Faker..sick of defending himself possibly for several years etc)
- i think a mod has stated that the pics in yr profile dont have to be yours.as long as they are not...whatever/cant recall specificlly)
I dont believe he or anyone else has to 'prove themselves' ( as i believe Monster stuck to his guns re that-admirable,in my books)
--and i geuss another 1001 posts will follow
--but he was a fake'.
..you DONT know that/and THATS whats annoyed and upset many folk on this board/site (in my opinion)
We with partial profiles, no pics etc would not be lpsg members if there was a requirement to prove' ourselves!
As i mentioned earlier i have not read the TOS but can safely assume i would not be here..if there was criteria insisting that i come up with proof of me being me.
I think myself,if legitimacy revolves around a specific sign...incl the .org...proves your legit..(sorry Rob-not taking the piss with the idea) well all well and good/but it really still proves very little in my books.(as others have mentioned elsewhere.)
Heard of...'its the best we have got'
In fact if it was a requirement and i wanted to remain on site, i would probably source out a mate with a large dik,who was prepared to..and get all the requiremnts done..FAKE that i am'
( so poses the question-how many of those exist)

I also ask,is there a form of perfection that some may seek in others,especially other lpsg members
Acceptance,i think is a key word on a site like this.
enz

 

[Mem]

His member name should have been a clue to all of us..... MONTERS ARE FAKE.... Monsters are not real.

 

[D_Clumbert Cocksicle]

Joined before me,similar amount of posts...similar amount of reading of,prior to posting. -different outlook.. on a fellow member,who had been on site since......Dec 2005 with ..4.000 * posts to his credit

Gerom6
Actually I am happy that he is banned. Though I have not contributed much to this site, I have however viewed virtually every post on this site, and I have found that monster has been a great poster (in terms of compliments and flattery) but a really bad person as he never once proved that he was himself.

Please dont take this as an attack on your opinion Gerom6,just using your post to illustrate a point.

I ask you,did you read Monsters earlier posts where he like most of us newbies,asked genuine questions perhaps supported others, (i dont recall-not totally into analyzing all and sundry on here.)
Dont you think a fellow member perhaps especially the long term members deserve some respect,they have earnt there credibility,surely.
He chose not to validate himself (you know of choice,.. you have the right to choose etc..)
I dont think you can state he was lying to himself/and all other people who complimented the images....it was there choice to do so,and if they believed it was him/or not,if it was there fantasy to believe, well there choice..surely)
Do you think any person would could become jaded' after an amount of time on here.?
(as in SICK' of being called a Faker..sick of defending himself possibly for several years etc)
- i think a mod has stated that the pics in yr profile dont have to be yours.as long as they are not...whatever/cant recall specificlly)
I dont believe he or anyone else has to 'prove themselves' ( as i believe Monster stuck to his guns re that-admirable,in my books)
--and i geuss another 1001 posts will follow
--but he was a fake'.
..you DONT know that/and THATS whats annoyed and upset many folk on this board/site (in my opinion)
We with partial profiles, no pics etc would not be lpsg members if there was a requirement to prove' ourselves!
As i mentioned earlier i have not read the TOS but can safely assume i would not be here..if there was criteria insisting that i come up with proof of me being me.
I think myself,if legitimacy revolves around a specific sign...incl the .org...proves your legit..(sorry Rob-not taking the piss with the idea) well all well and good/but it really still proves very little in my books.(as others have mentioned elsewhere.)
Heard of...'its the best we have got'
In fact if it was a requirement and i wanted to remain on site, i would probably source out a mate with a large dik,who was prepared to..and get all the requiremnts done..FAKE that i am'
( so poses the question-how many of those exist)

I also ask,is there a form of perfection that some may seek in others,especially other lpsg members
Acceptance,i think is a key word on a site like this.
enz

Sure, I am all for acceptance, but I cannot, however, overlook a hypocrite who called other people fakes when he was a fake himself. I'm not in any way suggesting that he did not heavily contribute to an enjoyable environment at LPSG, but if one believes one has the right to blacklist other people, how about starting off without any lies.

 

[D_Clumbert Cocksicle]

Oh yeah... BTW, I do have pics, and my profile isn't partial it is colorful (Kinda hurts the eyes a little).

 

[Skull Mason]

. Fraud .

 

[WolvesInTheThroneRoom]

Is the party still going on? :wiggle:

 

[8060]

I just read the whole thread. Blinding. When I was told that he was banned, I cracked up. I don't think his gallery pics had anything to do with his ban. If he's said all of the things to some of the other members that some of you have said, then the ban was inevitable.

I found his personality playful and funny when I spoke to him. It was very much Internet expected. I've never come in contact with this terrible person that some has described. I've never questioned anyone authenticity on here. How can you? It's the Internet. Call it gullibility or what have you. I like to refer to it as a nonchalant ambivalence:smile:​

 

[Trinity]

Oh well. R.I.P. Monster lol

Rumors of Monster's demise have been greatly exaggerated.

He started in on mademoiselle rouge for no reason so I just went after him, in defense of others and didn't let up, he fell for it (his demise) and then here came his 'buddies' to rescue him andthen he sent me a pm telling me I'd been reported for harassment, which I promptly posted in the thread, he didn't deny it, maybe that was his demise, he also made statements saying they were checking my isp, haha, which may have contributed- (inferring/claiming actions by mods that weren't true?).Then suddenly the thread was closed, for a moment I thought, damn he really is a mod, but then within 10-15 mins, maybe sooner, he was banned.
It wasn't the fake pics-read gillette and prepstudinsc- it was I believe his starting harassment of other members, coupled with the fact that he there was evidence of his harassment of members via pm.

I may have to get rouge to re-post this for it to get any attention

*wipes the sweat off his brow* All for you my lady

Tarzan freely admits he went after Monster and didn't let up.

 

[Mem]

Tarzan freely admits he went after Monster and didn't let up.

Thank You, TarzanKingOfMars....good Work.