First, I think you're confused. I just said big dick not huge dick (big>=7" and huge>=8"). Second, given the studies, unless you're swinging and putting out the advert for only big/huge dick, I can't imagine that you get that much of it. It is rare. If in fact you have a lot of sex, then sex itself is enjoyable to you and you are likely to find all dick to be basically equal.
For recreational sex, skill being equal, big dick matters. Just watch some amateur porn for reasonable proof (It is free and all over the internet). Average (6") dick with skill trumps big dick with no skill. The basis of skill is staying power.
Caveat being that length is being proportional to circumference. Thickness is 70% of size for the sake of aesthetic and physical stimulation.
I'm cut and happy enough with the fact, but with a good looking penis women love a foreskin when giving a hand job. The mechanics of it seem to entrance them. It's funny to watch.
P.S. 6X5 inch dick with skill makes almost all women happy enough.
Still patronizing women! I am NOT confused. I know how to use a measuring tape, and I also know the exact lengths of my fingers, my palm, and my forearm. When I give a number, it's a real number, not an internet number. I have had more than my share of partners with dicks whose length measured between 6" and 8", but I have had a few partners with lengths between 8" and 10". Like I said, I hit the lotto over and over, and I know it. Even more rare are opportunities for sex with men with penises between 2" and under 5". Some of the lengths in that range are just as rare, and surveys imply that these men are by far less sexually active than their larger counterparts. I'm attractive, I have a nice body, I'm friendly and approachable, I'm charming whenever I like, and when I was single I made no secret of being open to casual sexual relationships. I assume only a certain kind of man knows how to respond to a personality and mindset like mine. I also know from reading threads and chatting with men on measurection.com that guys who think they have small cocks DO NOT approach tall women with large breasts. They say things like, "Men with huge dicks deserve to get girls like that, not me." I am only attracted to very tall men, and in my experience very tall men with small pricks are even less likely to go for my type. Men with small penises think women with my body type are A: Used to bigger dicks already, and B: Born with larger vaginae than short, petite women. Trust: my actual experiences as a sexually active woman trump your speculations regarding the female experience every single day of the week.
Next, your definitions of what "big", "huge", and "average" penises measure are nothing more than subjective semantics, dipped in speculative bullshit. Big, and huge can only ever be subjective, and the best studies put the average length closer to 5.1"-5.7".
Now. For me, for recreational sex (which we'll define as all sex where offspring are not the main objective, AKA: damn' near all sexual encounters) skill being equal (read slowly now) SIZE DOES NOT MATTER. For me. A guy who knows how to give and receive pleasure with his specific penis is not going to have a problem with me. Shorter-hung men have found sensitive regions inside me that men on this site never mention. They are probably too big to receive a measure of pleasure which is comparable to the pleasure I receive when a man strokes those zones. Likewise, smaller men, regardless of skill, do not, cannnot provide certain sensations which only bigger men can. I like a very full, stretched feeling throughout. A smaller guy can only (if the angle is just right) give the same full, stretched feeling to one section at a time, and that section is never symmetrical. It feels great though.
What it boils down to for me is that I find the pleasure from a smaller-hung guy to be equal but different to the pleasure from a larger, or even much larger-hung guy. It is absolutely not the same set of sensations, but I happen to equally enjoy the full gamut. I have spoken to women in my personal life, as well as online with far less sexual experience than I who have said the same thing. They feel the difference, they just happen to love the feelings anyway. For women like us, the size doesn't matter. It's just a non-issue. My one disclaimer would be that when I have had opportunity with men who packed fewer than 3" I did not take these opportunities, because the overwhelming evidence was that it wouldn't work out. One in particular seemed to lack basic make-out skills. To everything there is a limit.
I disagree that the basis of skill is staying power. The basis of skill is sexual knowledge of one's own body and pleasure. Only with this self-awareness can one guess at the best way to give pleasure to another. Communication is key, but if a partner can't even guess, can't get himself into the ballpark, how does one guide him or her? Endurance is also necessary, but endurance without sexual knowledge of oneself is completely worthless. I don't care how long a man can last if he can't do anything right!
I don't mind that I had to break this down for you like this. Learning from each other is one reason we're all here. I mind that I had to explain it to you not because you asked respectful questions, but rather because you are the kind of know-it-all who thinks he can speak for an entirety of a group of people to which he doesn't even belong! Your post was inflammatory, patronizing, condescending, poorly defended, and just plain insulting.
:smile:
