Status
Not open for further replies.

LukeStwart

Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2019
Posts
169
Media
0
Likes
1,602
Points
288
Location
Tampa, FL, USA
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
He’s a very sexy and attractive guy.
Since he’s in DNP list we are not sharing nudes or anything. Just talk about his onlyfans and all that hottness
 

Seattlemb

Cherished Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Posts
100
Media
0
Likes
363
Points
233
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Interesting business model he's using on OF. The page is free to follow, but all the content (other than the IG type pixs) costs. Granted, they are all fairly low priced so far, but he must make more money this way if enough ppl buy. He's very hot, but so far no frontal nudity and the one rear nude I bought was not great in terms of what you could see (basically pulling down his short, so you just saw the top of his butt, not the total thing or legs). He seems very concerned (or perhaps calculated) about what he shows so far. I'd never heard of him until he started posing with S@ndell recently. Is D that big of a thing as an influencer? Does anyone think he'll ever show full nudity? Is he just trying to milk the PG crowd first and then will step it up or is this all he's going to ever show?
 

Seattlemb

Cherished Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Posts
100
Media
0
Likes
363
Points
233
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
From the inactivity of this thread, I guess he is not resonating with too many folks, since there is so little talk about his OF. I think he's very sexy with a hot body, but his content is getting stale. He usually posts a couple times a day: a PG-13 type pix/video that is ppv followed by a modeling photo that is free asking you to take a look at the pay post. He'll then email details about the pay post as well. The details he gives about the pay post vary. Sometimes he's fairly specific, other times sort of vague, but always kind of hyping it up the way most content makers do. As of now, he seems to be stuck in the playing-with-a-boner-inside-his-underwear or a flash of ass, but no full-frontal nudity that I am aware of. Seems he's taking the S@ndell business model on this one. I wonder if S@ndell is managing/directing him since they've modeled together? If he doesn't step it up soon, I think a lot of his OF followers are going to move on. I will say that his posts are fairly reasonably priced, but how many times do you want to shell out $5/$6 to see the exact same thing? Is anyone aware of any particularly good/revealing posts he's put up?
 
D

deleted2191631

Guest
At some point, I hope. Guy will learn to stop immediately subscribing to the big Instagram/TikTok account O.F. pages as they all will leave you with a limp d*ck! It's truly about cashing in on popularity. There are too many times on these threads of guy mentioning not getting what they expected. However, these "models" got exactly what they expected ... Your MONEY!
 

Seattlemb

Cherished Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Posts
100
Media
0
Likes
363
Points
233
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Feel free to say, "I told you so" if you want.

Today I bought his latest daily ppv video on impulse. It was only $5 (as most of his are), so I took the chance. He said it was an after-shower, towel video. I expected some teasing or...something I have to admit; I found it a disappointment and I wish I hadn't paid for it. It was similar to the one above for free on tiktok, but in a home bathroom and he did play a bit with his bulge a bit on the outside of his towel, but that was it. I've seen more more exciting visuals in a public locker room. He seems like a nice enough guy. Obviously hot with an amazing body. I appreciate him doing this OF and I want to support it if there is decent content. But, if the videos/pix continue to be bulge/tease/implied I don't think I'll keep buying. He's shown more than today's video, where he never took off the towel to even tease the front or show his butt, for the same price before. This one should have been $2 or $3 at most. I am not trying to be bash him. He should do what he's comfortable with. I'm not expecting porn, but if there is no full nudity soon, I just can't justify continued purchasing.

The part that added insult-to-injury was that I typed up a respectful DM to him saying the same as above. His OF DMs say, "messages with tips will appear at the top", which is fine. I didn't care where it showed up. Then, after I typed it, the send button was grayed out and it said, "Please tip to send this message." It's one thing to tip for visibility, but to have to pay money to tell you I feel like I wasted money? I'll blame that on the OF business model, not him.
 
D

deleted2191631

Guest
Feel free to say, "I told you so" if you want.

Today I bought his latest daily ppv video on impulse. It was only $5 (as most of his are), so I took the chance. He said it was an after-shower, towel video. I expected some teasing or...something I have to admit; I found it a disappointment and I wish I hadn't paid for it. It was similar to the one above for free on tiktok, but in a home bathroom and he did play a bit with his bulge a bit on the outside of his towel, but that was it. I've seen more more exciting visuals in a public locker room. He seems like a nice enough guy. Obviously hot with an amazing body. I appreciate him doing this OF and I want to support it if there is decent content. But, if the videos/pix continue to be bulge/tease/implied I don't think I'll keep buying. He's shown more than today's video, where he never took off the towel to even tease the front or show his butt, for the same price before. This one should have been $2 or $3 at most. I am not trying to be bash him. He should do what he's comfortable with. I'm not expecting porn, but if there is no full nudity soon, I just can't justify continued purchasing.

The part that added insult-to-injury was that I typed up a respectful DM to him saying the same as above. His OF DMs say, "messages with tips will appear at the top", which is fine. I didn't care where it showed up. Then, after I typed it, the send button was grayed out and it said, "Please tip to send this message." It's one thing to tip for visibility, but to have to pay money to tell you I feel like I wasted money? I'll blame that on the OF business model, not him.
Nah. Not an "I told you so moment." You found a guy hot and you made an impulse purchase! @ on $5 bucks!
Of course, his itemizing or offering ' a la carte' entertainment regardless of price and it turns out to just be a "tease" is wrong, IMO!

I can't blame O.F.'s business model as it is designed/setup to allow a "creator", "model" or whatever to get as much as they possibly can! I don't believe the charge per DM is a mandatory thing but one feature that can be implemented by the "creator" So, it would be Dawson held to blame for setting up a feature where you can't message him unless you pay.
 

Seattlemb

Cherished Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Posts
100
Media
0
Likes
363
Points
233
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Nah. Not an "I told you so moment." You found a guy hot and you made an impulse purchase! @ on $5 bucks!
Of course, his itemizing or offering ' a la carte' entertainment regardless of price and it turns out to just be a "tease" is wrong, IMO!

I can't blame O.F.'s business model as it is designed/setup to allow a "creator", "model" or whatever to get as much as they possibly can! I don't believe the charge per DM is a mandatory thing but one feature that can be implemented by the "creator" So, it would be Dawson held to blame for setting up a feature where you can't message him unless you pay.
Thanks for the information. It sounds like it's his choice to charge his fans he "loves so much" to even DM him then. I guess I should not be surprised.

He also replied to a comment today asking straight out if he plans to show frontal and he said no. He just isn't comfortable with it (Translation: Of course I would, and probably have, but I'm afraid if I do it now it will limit my other opportunities). That is fine, but he just said in a live a week or so ago that he would be doing full nudity soon. Like most OF creators, who has any semblance of monetary streams outside that platform, I'm sure he's trying to figure out how much OF money he can make with showing the least. Will he change his mind at some point and post nudes? Maybe. If so, I may buy. As long as it's only PG/IG-with-an-edge content, I'm done spending my money on him. I wish him luck though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Siahpdx and tnuser5
1

1307457

Guest
Once people simply stop paying them attention they'll go crazy and cave
 

John McWilliam

Cherished Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2015
Posts
133
Media
0
Likes
402
Points
183
The descriptions of the videos imply some kind of frontal, but I don't trust him enough to pay. Can anyone confirm what is actually shown in these?

You can't call it frontal if you can't see the dick...
 

Attachments

chillax005

Experimental Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2010
Posts
22
Media
0
Likes
20
Points
148
Location
philippines
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
The descriptions of the videos imply some kind of frontal, but I don't trust him enough to pay. Can anyone confirm what is actually shown in these?

You can't call it frontal if you can't see the dick...
White wet undies with hard dick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.