dear mods of the ask-a-straight-man forum:

[twoton]

Guess we straight guys now know what the ladies go through.

After I'd been aggressively hit-on (the first time) my eyes were opened, and it was pretty damn scary.

 

[Fuzzy_]

i don't mind the gays...

Yeah, they're okay.

...but i do demand some respect for my own lifestyle. nobody is trolling the 'ask a gay man' forum trying to convince them all to eat pussy. we don't force pussy down gay guys' throats, we don't need them trying to force cock down ours. it's unclassy, unflattering, boring, repetetive, and wreaks of harassment as well as desperation.

Fuzzy agrees with you. Would any of these guys have the nerve to walk up to you on the street and ask if you'd suck their dicks? When guys harass women on this site, they're trounced without mercy. But when men are harassed, they're basically on their own. To be fair, there are straight guys on this site who love to show off, and love praise from anyone -- young, old, male, female, gay, straight. This sends out conflicting signals that they may or may not want anyone and everyone to suck their cock.

At the end of the day, this is a big penis page and any guy should come here knowing that they'll be objectified and seen as a sexual object.

 

[328982]

well, this thread didn't help anything. ugh. i'd simply like to point out that
a) somebody on a rice pudding sight might be trying to sell his own rice pudding, not eat somebody else's, and he would probably participate in the section of the forum that is for sellers, not buyers
b) that nyc guy said some pretty shitty things about all gays

NYC has a poInt though. This site is all about big cocks. How many pesky gay men are you going to find on a site dedicated to sweet, tight pussy? Maybe that's more your market stall. Not that I don't want you here, but maybe you'd be more comfortable.

 

[longandskinny]

Am I right that "str8" is just a really annoying way of saying "bicurious"?

 

[554279]

NYC has a poInt though. This site is all about big cocks. How many pesky gay men are you going to find on a site dedicated to sweet, tight pussy? Maybe that's more your market stall. Not that I don't want you here, but maybe you'd be more comfortable.

lol

More to the point regarding your quote of the other guys quote; I don't think I will ever eat rice pudding again!

 

[ronin001]

Technically anyone can post within the rules on the TOS. So gay males can post in the Ask a Straight guy Forum. As long as the postings are not out right Baiting, as long as the question has not been asked 20 times previously, it does not really bother me. I will either answer it or ignore it and life goes on.

My only complaint is when there is a posting and someone gives their honest answer. The Original poster; or some new champion on the topic then argues how any answer not agreeing with the OP is wrong, or they are homophobic or that they fear the sight of another mans penis

I have been on the receiving end of a few of these rebuttals and have read quite a few when others were in the same boat. Makes for a very uncomfortable enviornment

 

[Fuzzy_]

I agree with 100 percent of what you typed too. But most of the guys here are so warped out of their minds they don't know straight means. Continue to talk about how they love she males or whatever and then say well I am straight or all people are a little bisexual just to try to rationalize them being gay. Instead of just saying I am gay and proud or I am bisexual and proud.

Why would a gay person be attracted to a 'she male'? Maybe human sexuality is more complicated than gay, bi or straight. It's interesting to see the various arguments people make while attempting to fit everyone into one category or the other. We love our labels.

 

[longandskinny]

I couldn't agree more. If you have sexual contact with a male then you aren't straight. Heterosexual means to be only attracted and have sexual contact with the opposite sex.

If you are gay or bisexual who cares but it is funny to me when people try to changed that it means or say well I identify myself as straight even though they have sexual contact with males.

The problem is that "bisexual" implies to a lot of people that you're equally attracted to both, but what if you're mostly attracted to women but occasionally are interested in men? These categories don't capture the actual spectrum of sexual desire very well.

 

[Fuzzy_]

It has nothing to do with labels it has to do with people like trying to justify what a word means. If I kill somebody I am a murderer. Because that is what the word means. If a person has sex with kids he or she is a pedophile. Because is what the word means.

People like you crack me up, clearly you aren't straight which is why you didn't even bother to put if you a gay or not. But you try to justify and rationalize a word, or use the people love to label card.

If you like just a male and is only attracted to females then you are straight.

If you are male and like just other males then you are gay.

If you are male and like both sexes then you are bisexual. Even a crack head could understand that but clearly that is too much for so many people of this forum and real life.

But like the person who made this thread stated these sill post talking about straight guys fucking or getting blown by gay guys needs to stop.

You clearly feel strongly about this issue. But going by your post history, you have a strong interest in cock and homosexuality. This is not surprising. Welcome to the site.

You clearly live in a very simple world. Most of us realize that not all killers are murderers and not all people who have sex with kids are pedophiles (which is why close-in-age laws exist). But don't let minutiae cripple your attempts at labeling.

 

[temptotalk]

The problem is that "bisexual" implies to a lot of people that you're equally attracted to both, but what if you're mostly attracted to women but occasionally are interested in men? These categories don't capture the actual spectrum of sexual desire very well.

Wouldn't you still be bi? You're basically saying that bisexuality doesn't fit the spectrum of sexual desire very well as if the label was the one that forced restrictions on itself. As in, there is no timeline for bisexuality. If at any point you are or can be sexually aroused by both sex's then bisexuality more than fits you. When it comes to labels, bisexuality is a board as sexual labels go.

Attracted to a transsexual? Attracted to women that dress like men or men that dress like women? Well both of those instances have to start out at either male or female right? So either way bisexuality would still fit. Even after that persons transition.

Lets say you were attracted to someone that doesn't have sex. Well you still have to start somewhere. Is that person a male or a female? Cause either way if you're attracted to them sexually that would mean you were attracted to physical attributes of one sex or another. Unless at the point of attraction that person is in the middle of procedures. Even then bisexuality states you would be attracted to both males and females so it would still fit.

Without bisexuality as a label/description it would go a little something like this.

I blew a dude/had homosexual sex/had gay sex five years ago, liked it and would do it again.

Which easily translates to:

I'm bisexual.

If it's just the labeling thats an issue then it's fine. Why not end all labels then?

 

[longandskinny]

Lol another guy insecure about his cock obsession and secretly wondering if that makes him a fag. Don't worry, dude, you're still

Lol now you are trying to justify pedophiles now? Classy stuff. Good that you think having sex with kids is okay.

No I have a strong interest in looking at straight porn. I also enjoy other peoples opinion on cock size so try again.

But it is okay if you aren't bright enough to understand what a word means and are ashamed to be gay then that is your problem. I actually went to college and graduated so I can understand what words mean. Maybe if you spend a little less time here and a little more time reading you would understand words mean.

The label shit is as funny as when females sleep around with tons of people and say stop slut shamming them. Putting a label on somebody is saying all black people are this, all white people do this or all some other race does something else.

Not saying if you like men sexually then you aren't straight. But trying to explain stuff to people with low intelligence like you is trying to teach a shark not to swim. Let me just ignore you just like most people in the real world do.

Word meanings aren't fixed. It seems that for a lot of men, "straight" means being all or mostly, but not necessarily exclusively, attracted to women. If you really are exclusively attracted to women, you then might call yourself "pure straight" or "totally straight".

And he wasn't justifying pedophilia. He was pointing out that there's a difference between kids having sex with each other and an adult having sex with a kid, even though both involve sex with kids.

 

[longandskinny]

LOL I don't like how this site saves drafts automatically. Ignore what's above the box.

 

[Hatt_101]

If you really are exclusively attracted to women, you then might call yourself "pure straight" or "totally straight".

no one who is straight should have to add a prefix onto it because being straight already means this. Putting "pure or totally" is redundant because Straight already means you are only attracted to women sexually and romantically.

when a person dies you dont say they are purely dead or totally dead because there is no chance of them coming back to life or being undead. you would just say that they are dead

 

[longandskinny]

no one who is straight should have to add a prefix onto it because being straight already means this. Putting "pure or totally" is redundant because Straight already means you are only attracted to women sexually and romantically.

when a person dies you dont say they are purely dead or totally dead because there is no chance of them coming back to life or being undead. you would just say that they are dead.

It depends on what most people take "straight" to mean. As I said earlier, using straight for exclusively straight and gay for exclusively gay and lumping everything else into "bisexual" doesn't capture the nuances of the whole spectrum very well. It makes sense that people might start redefining terms and coining new ones.

 

[Hatt_101]

It depends on what most people take "straight" to mean. As I said earlier, using straight for exclusively straight and gay for exclusively gay and lumping everything else into "bisexual" doesn't capture the nuances of the whole spectrum very well. It makes sense that people might start redefining terms and coining new ones.

it may not define everyone well but changing the meaning of a word that already has a clear cut meaning doesnt help either. all it does is create confusion and then people get surprised when someone tells a person they are straight and cant understand why the dont want a bj from a guy

if it doesnt describe a person fully they shouldn't use it to describe themselves. its like teal its neither green nor blue but if you start calling it blue when it is not, if a person wanted to have a blue room and come home to see that it is teal instead of blue it will create a problem

 

[ronin001]

Original things usually stay original. What follows are modifications to the original, knock offs, clones, light versions or upgrades.
Example Coke a Cola is the original: But there have been many versions of the drink each with its own nature. Each is coke just as all guys, Hetero or Homo are Men, Only the original unchanged tweaked version is actually Coke. Technically the same goes for the Ortho definition of Straight

Attached is a list of all Coke named products

I have to say something I have never said before. Sorry about the size ( of the attachment )

 

[longandskinny]

If our vocabulary can't capture the difference between someone who's 80% straight and 20% gay and someone who's 20% straight and 80% gay, then we have a problem. To use the same word "bisexual" for such widely different sexual orientations is just irrational, in my opinion.

 

[Hatt_101]

If our vocabulary can't capture the difference between someone who's 80% straight and 20% gay and someone who's 20% straight and 80% gay, then we have a problem. To use the same word "bisexual" for such widely different sexual orientations is just irrational, in my opinion.

in that case both are bi but one just prefers women more the other prefers men more. being bi doesn't mean you have to like both men and women equally.

i have a friend at school and she herself says shes bi even thought she is dating a guy. and although she is dating a guy she says that over all she prefers girls more.

 

[longandskinny]

in that case both are bi but one just prefers women more the other prefers men more. being bi doesn't mean you have to like both men and women equally.

i have a friend at school and she herself says shes bi even thought she is dating a guy. and although she is dating a guy she says that over all she prefers girls more.

But if "bisexual" can't capture what seems to me to be an essential difference, i.e. whether you prefer the same sex or the opposite sex over the other, then it's not a very useful category as it stands. Indeed, it's only useful on the assumption that most people are exclusively attracted to the opposite sex, but I am very doubtful that is the case. Most people are probably "bisexual" by your stringent definitions.

 

[Hatt_101]

But if "bisexual" can't capture what seems to me to be an essential difference, i.e. whether you prefer the same sex or the opposite sex over the other, then it's not a very useful category as it stands. Indeed, it's only useful on the assumption that most people are exclusively attracted to the opposite sex, but I am very doubtful that is the case. Most people are probably "bisexual" by your stringent definitions.

but why do you need to know what a person prefers more when they tell you they are bi? its not really like they have to tell you, you should just accept that they are bi and have the potential to like either gender regardless if they prefer one over the other.

i really do not think most people are bi at all. that girl is the only bi person i have ever met, maybe on lpsg most people are bi but i dont think for the average person the same can be said

bi would still be a better description than calling themselves straight or gay because bi covers both genders where as gay and straight are just the same or opposite gender respectively