You made no reasonable analogy.
Correction, sweetie... you missed it. Even after I broke things down and explained it to you. Enlighten and try to comprehend what your adversary is trying to say, instead of trying to dismiss everything that isn't typed by your own claws. Open your eyes next time, OK?
The letter from the family is valid because it is valid.
In other words, it is because it is? Like there's a Book of Trinity in the new testament? Nice argument style, Mary, assuming the "So sayeth the shepherd, so sayeth the flock" defense!
:rofl:
At a townhall there was a young man who asked for a job and another older woman who told the President she was homeless living in her car and needed a home. They needed help now. It was valid because it was valid. If you don't get that, that's your problem.
Oh I get it... I just think your reasoning is
beyond laughable.
You and others are most certainly attempting to dictate how and what people who disagree with can post. And nobody is twisting your words.
You're the one saying something is true because in your view, IT IS. Doesn't leave much room for questioning now does it, McFly?
You sound ridiculous...you brought up the National Enquirer. It was a stupid comment.
It was stupid to you because
you failed to understand it. That's not my problem.
Now you resort to name calling when you can't support your own posts. You misinterpreted that the letter from this family is valid on its own merits and continue to try to devalue it.
Oh Harriet, I did not discredit the letter. I'm just not as phased by it as you are. Too many obvious, LOGICAL questions arose when I read the story. Like for instance, let's look at the adult(s) of this piece who decided to use their children as a cheap, political ploy to pluck the emotional strings of the easily swayed. What was their financial plan? How come they are in this predicament? Was it due to decades of bad planning, some really horrible bad luck? Were they on the road to ruin before this, or did it just start to happen as soon as Obama got into the White House? Is it a long, factored list of problems stretching over years of mistakes (intentional or not), or was it just because Obama didn't get them that so-called "change" he promised in less than 1/8th of his term in office?
It now may be Obama's responsibility to make sure people don't fall through the cracks, however, it IS ultimately the responsibility of every adult to take care of their own problems. It's ridiculous to look at an argument from one side of the coin, and not even address the other side. That's your problem, Trinster... you're one-sided.
You don't get to call me a troll because I posted my political opinion. Just like you and everybody else.
This is a free world, sweetie, so I can call you whatever I wish. Be thankful I'm just calling you that. Don't make me get creative.
:biggrin1:
You quoted me saying "I have never blamed Obama for the problems of America" then you pull these threads. NONE of this these threads or posts blame Obama for America's problems as you accused me of doing.
Denial is the first part of the 12 step recovery program to forum acceptance. Ready to take the other eleven? So sorry if I can read between the lines, Mary.
They are threads from the 2008 Presidential Election and each are regarding his candidacy. I told you this before, but it bears repeating: You may not agree with me or share my views but you don't get to dictate what and how people post their political opinions.
I'm not telling you what to say. I'm more than happy to let you say what you wish because even a comedic writer for "The Office" and "30 Rock" can't be this funny.
And you certainly don't get to start making things up and making wild accusations like I'm blaming Obama for America's problems.
It's an accusation that not only I believe, but MANY OTHERS as well. If that's not the case, then you may consider changing your tune. Or, you can go find another "Dear Mr. President" letter, start a thread and cry those fake tears of injustice. Your call.
The rest of that isn't not worth even responding to.
But you're going to anyway, aren't you Blanche?
You sound ridiculous on so many counts in your defense of Obama - talking about "smearing" him when a family is talking about their need of help just like other Americans have implored Obama
And seriously tro... I mean, Trinster. How many families are writing letters to Obama asking him for help? Do you have a running total? Are you bombarding White House mail and coming up with your own analysis? Or are you just taking a belligerent stance on this issue, refusing any other form of logical reasoning just to act as if you're above everyone else on the matter? Somehow I don't think you've ever had to grow up poor, because if you did then you would really be able to understand things like this happen EVERYDAY in this country. Families mailed letters to Bush when they lost work and their homes. Same for Clinton, Bush I, Reagan, Carter, Ford and every other modern day president before that. It's like watching beggars on the streets of Manhattan. You want to feel their pain and struggle, but after seeing so many of them you tend to get numb to that feeling. It's something nobody can really relate to unless they've been in the same shoes. And going by your tone, I can tell you've NEVER worn a pair.
-only the Family actually points out that the Stimulus is leaving out homeowners and that job creation now is imperative to help struggling families from becoming homeless;
No, actually may other people besides this family have said that already. I'm sure you could have read that in that "journalistic newspaper" you sourced. Or were you too busy reading Garfield?
Your "Shit Happens" diatribe which you have the nerve to call me infantile for failing to understand, and your colorful language which appears to have a favorite - "bullshit."
Actually, if you even
tried to comprehend anything that I said, you'd see that I'm saying a LOT more than just "shit happens". Then again, you haven't even tried to understand what I'm saying so to go into detail here would be a lost cause.
You and I do not agree on Obama.
No shit.
For the most part, you and I do not agree on the Obama Administration's policies thus far.
Wow... 2 for 2! Want to go for the Daily Double?
We don't have to. If you don't like this family's letter to the President, you don't have to. You don't get to dictate it's validity.
In a democracy, I have every right to express my opinion about the validity of a story. It's called Freedom Of Speech you hack. I know, maybe not in the Book of Trinity you can. However, you're not the one running things now are we?
You post your political opinions and I will post mine.
And in the process, we'll keep laughing at you with every ridiculous story of emotional rhetoric you spew.
It's our right.