Yeah, I'm excited to see how he does. On the one hand, I think he's a great guy, has a good vision for the future of the country, is very honest, and is very down to earth. He's my favorite of those in the field, although I do have positive opinions of many others (particularly Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris).
But I also think Beto's naieve and inexperienced. These aren't negatives for my support, but he's one of only three candidates, for example, who lack a degree in political science or law (the others being Tulsi Gabbard and John Hickenlooper). He suffered a lot in the Texas Senate race against low blows from Cruz that he wasn't expecting and thought would just get written off as the crazy talk it was if he didn't respond to it (so Ted successfully misrepresented his views on a lot of issues and painted him as really into gun seizures and destruction of the Texas oil industry etc).
I'm hoping he's learned from that experience because I'm sure there will be more of it in the other direction (certain PACs for other candidates that will paint him as a conservative in the pocket of big oil and such).
Quick topic change to Andrew Yang. I think Wally brought him up in this discussion. He's definitely a smart guy. Listening to him, he doesn't really jump out as Presidential material to me, but I could easily see him being on a president's staff (advisor, head of a department, etc). I think he's raising a lot of good points that others aren't discussing and I hope he gets listened to.