1.) After I showed the cajones to stand up like a man and apologize for a sloppy mistake, it is particularly ungracious of you to be insulting and continue to throw egg in my face. Don't you claim to be better than that? 2.) I have read every word you've posted in this thread two or three times, and I have as yet to discover this elusive 'issue' you keep alluding to. Most likely it is something you imagined, just another of those discussions taking place in your confused itty-bitty minds. 3.) Furthermore, it is patently absurd for you to claim you have refuted or even responded to my point. Again, I can only surmise that this is another discussion taking place inside your shrunken little heads. Please have the courtesy to read through as I have done. Unless you are completely deranged, which is a distinct possibility, you will discover this to be the case. If I am wrong, prove it.I already did. Of course you failed to get it. You've already gotten egg on your face once. Just discuss the political issues...if you can.
My point: In your deranged miniscule minds you harbor these tiny thoughts, completely oblivious to the concept of critical thinking. Therefore, anything outside your predetermined perception of reality is incomprehensible to you. This is why you incessantly spin the same uninformed opinions over and over and over like a broken record, as if the mere repetition somehow makes it so. This is why you employ the first person plural - 'WE' know the truth' and 'the American people think' - in a vain attempt to bolster your vacuous opinions.
If you are capable of grasping anything, it should be a clue to you that virtually no one here agrees with you on anything, and the few that barely tolerate you are idiots. This is why everyone else thinks you are an ignorant annoying pest and an utter moron, which you continue to prove factually again and again. This is why your condescension to anyone capable of critical thinking and vastly better informed than you is ironic in the tenth degree.
Did you respond to one of the voices in your head? Try ignoring them sometimes and get a clue. Your only responses out here in the real world have been to state that "we don't get it" or "I've answered that before". Try answering a question when it's asked of you.
It has three personalities(that we know of) so why not a name for each one? I'm sure that it has so few friends(other than the voices in it's head)that it will respond to any name.Awwwwww... and I was getting so used to calling it Trinsanity too!!
Evan Bayh doesn't know of which he speaks. I make it a point not to take Quitters very seriously.......(didn't Palin quit?)
Sends shockwaves throughout Washington.
Condescension noted . . .
Again, I am asking you. What is your point? Please tell me so I can "deal with the issues".Now, now...no need to get emotional and resort to childish name calling.
Don't you mean to say "we" know what "we're" talking about?
Again, I am begging you, please play by your own rules. Please "put forth [your] 'decent' argument", so that 'intellectually challenged' though I may be, I may have an opportunity to "deal with the issues" and "refute" your arguments as best I can. That's only fair.. . . and I've always backed up my posts so you can try the name calling and insulting my intellect...but none of that holds true because you can't 'put forth a decent argument', refute my arguments or deal with the issues.
(That should properly be 'ones', but that's beside the 'point', isn't it?)If you think you are on the side of intellect then you lack commonsense as well as the intelligence to deal with the political discussions in this forum. The one's you backslap with have long proven themselves intellectually challenged.
No, you're mistaken. I'm just respecting their preference to be referred to in the ecclesiastical first person plural.
