Dick Head What Makes A Dick Pic Nsfw

Acratopotes

Loved Member
Joined
May 23, 2017
Posts
529
Media
0
Likes
677
Points
138
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
That's a strange line to take. It's a bit like saying a woman can wear the skimpiest bra, and bare most of the mound of her breasts, as long as she doesn't show the nipple and yet men can show nipple and no mound and no one objects.

Of course, the exact rules may vary from one employer to another and they in turn may refer to laws or guidelines within the country of operation. In the UK, during the time the obscene publications act was not only in operation but also taken seriously, AFAIK penises were fine as long as they were not erect.

Where I work, if I ever go into the office, one doesn't have to sail that close to the wind to get an objection - a poster of a woman in a bikini on the office wall would not be acceptable, not because it is is rude but because it is not in keeping with a professional environment. On the other hand, if one was booking a holiday and that same image appeared on a hotel website I doubt anyone would make a fuss.
 

Bigcockman1

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Posts
678
Media
16
Likes
8,871
Points
378
Location
Dubai City (Dubai, United Arab Emirates)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
That's a strange line to take. It's a bit like saying a woman can wear the skimpiest bra, and bare most of the mound of her breasts, as long as she doesn't show the nipple and yet men can show nipple and no mound and no one objects.

Of course, the exact rules may vary from one employer to another and they in turn may refer to laws or guidelines within the country of operation. In the UK, during the time the obscene publications act was not only in operation but also taken seriously, AFAIK penises were fine as long as they were not erect.

Where I work, if I ever go into the office, one doesn't have to sail that close to the wind to get an objection - a poster of a woman in a bikini on the office wall would not be acceptable, not because it is is rude but because it is not in keeping with a professional environment. On the other hand, if one was booking a holiday and that same image appeared on a hotel website I doubt anyone would make a fuss.


Even if a penis isnt erect it's still considered inappropriate. Many times in movies its acceptable to show a non erect penis. I didnt get that I know they think a non erect penis is considered non sexual but still your looking at a sex organ and even a non erect penis has many sexual connotations. Back to the topic I do think that the head of the penis what make it nsfw not wether its erect or not. When looking at an erect uncut penis it's not as much of a big deal compared to an erect cut cock.
 
7

7053701

Guest
That's a strange line to take. It's a bit like saying a woman can wear the skimpiest bra, and bare most of the mound of her breasts, as long as she doesn't show the nipple and yet men can show nipple and no mound and no one objects.

Of course, the exact rules may vary from one employer to another and they in turn may refer to laws or guidelines within the country of operation. In the UK, during the time the obscene publications act was not only in operation but also taken seriously, AFAIK penises were fine as long as they were not erect.

Where I work, if I ever go into the office, one doesn't have to sail that close to the wind to get an objection - a poster of a woman in a bikini on the office wall would not be acceptable, not because it is is rude but because it is not in keeping with a professional environment. On the other hand, if one was booking a holiday and that same image appeared on a hotel website I doubt anyone would make a fuss.
That is a really good answer.

It all depends on where you are, the context, the regulations of your region/country and website you are using. Just because a particular website has criteria for NSFW, doesn't mean that makes it NSFW, or permissible elsewhere.

For the most part, I would say any sexual content makes things NSFW, but so too is graphic violence/gore and maybe even substance use. I think it boils down to consideration of your professional work community. Do you think someone next to you wants to be exposed to certain imagery? In that same workplace, do you feel it is appropriate for someone to expose you to something that fits that criteria?

So, on that note, boiling it down to fine lines becomes a moot point.