I was aware that Yahoo! has been censoring the e-mail messages of its customers. I didn't think that Yahoo! counted as part of the news media. What was at issue is whether the news media were censoring something or somebody in connection with the Wall Street protests. I still don't see how any such thing has happened. Who has been censored by the news media in this event? The protestors? No. The news media have not in any way interfered with or suppressed their demonstrations. The neglect of reportage on an event may constitute bias or even misrepresentation, but it's not censorship.
Nice twist there! Or "spin" if I may be politically correct.
Yahoo IS news media. Even if they are small compared to CNN. You admit to knowing they censor, and you also know they are part of big media. As for the rest of Big Media, They didn't cover it ON PURPOSE. Which is censorship. No one is accusing big media of interfering or suppressing their demonstrations. What Big Media is being called out on is; 1) purposely NOT covering it at the start despite prior knowledge it was going to happen, 2) wrongfully demonizing it in it's first days and still is.
Now big media is trying to do damage control by covering it small bits at a time hoping it'll just go away. They know they've been busted by the people, and they know it's important to the people.
Big Media just doesn't want the people to decide what's important for the people to know.