Difference between big and huge?

dirkjesje

Loved Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Posts
1,407
Media
26
Likes
683
Points
258
Location
belgium
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Dirk,

Can I have an appraisal :)
Volume index = 21.06 so huge starting at 21. ( 1 on 769 )
An ideal penis for 87.6% ( huge is sometimes to much for some women )

Correction.
Correct measurement of non bone pressed is standing up, holding the erected penis as much horizontal to the floor, measuring on top from base to tip. (without pressure to the bone, only visable shaft will be measured)
Girth measurement - midshaft - and wrapping around the measuring tape somewhere. ( end minus begin = girth ) Not starting at zero, but where-ever. Tight. ( with an hard erection no problem )
Therefore a correction as I see your pics.
NBPL 7.0" x 5.95" midshaft girth gives a volume index of 19.33 which is big.
Now for 95.4% an ideal penis.
 
Last edited:

jd0198

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Posts
22
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
88
Gender
Male
Volume index = 21.06 so huge starting at 21. ( 1 on 769 )
An ideal penis for 87.6% ( huge is sometimes to much for some women )

Correction.
Correct measurement of non bone pressed is standing up, holding the erected penis as much horizontal to the floor, measuring on top from base to tip. (without pressure to the bone, only visable shaft will be measured)
Girth measurement - midshaft - and wrapping around the measuring tape somewhere. ( end minus begin = girth ) Not starting at zero, but where-ever. Tight. ( with an hard erection no problem )
Therefore a correction as I see your pics.
NBPL 7.0" x 5.95" midshaft girth gives a volume index of 19.33 which is big.
Now for 95.4% an ideal penis.

Why wouldn't you measure bone pressed? That part of your cock goes into the hole
 

dirkjesje

Loved Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Posts
1,407
Media
26
Likes
683
Points
258
Location
belgium
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Why wouldn't you measure bone pressed? That part of your cock goes into the hole
It enters only for a fraction, as the fat pad acts like a buffer.
NBPL basically reflects what you can see.
Normally the difference is 0.5" or less. ( If your body fat(fat pad) is very high the difference may be more than 1inch.)
Some will find the BPL more accurate, because it is less depending on the changings in your fat composition.
But I can only verify pics, and see only the visable volume, the same as you will buy condoms for it.
If you have a 6.5" NBPL you are not going to buy extra large for a 8" BPL which is 1.5" hidden in fat.
 

dirkjesje

Loved Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Posts
1,407
Media
26
Likes
683
Points
258
Location
belgium
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
So, 8" NBPL and 6.375" midshaft girth equates to...
First of all - 8" is a magic number, but rare if well measured NBPL.
The same for a midshaft girth above 6".
As I have no pics to verify, your volume index is 25.36 - huge ( 1 on 929 ) - for 72.71% an ideal penis. ( for some the girth will be too much )
 

Enigmuhh

1st Like
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Posts
19
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
38
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Yeah, I just got serious about "fleshing out" my profile and will have some pictures up soon. My length is a little weird though. It really fluctuates with depending on whatever number of factors. Sometimes it sits a shade under 8" while others it's a shade over. Go figure.

I was really surprised about my girth before I measured though. Since I had big hands, (which I was never aware of until a girl grabbed them one day and raved about their size) my girth never felt impressive in my hands.

Oh, and could you clarify what you mean by 8 being a magic number?
 
Last edited:

dirkjesje

Loved Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Posts
1,407
Media
26
Likes
683
Points
258
Location
belgium
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Yeah, I just got serious about "fleshing out" my profile and will have some pictures up soon. My length is a little weird though. It really fluctuates with depending on whatever number of factors. Sometimes it sits a shade under 8" while others it's a shade over. Go figure.

I was really surprised about my girth before I measured though. Since I had big hands, (which I was never aware of until a girl grabbed them one day and raved about their size) my girth never felt impressive in my hands.

Oh, and could you clarify what you mean by 8 being a magic number?
Well on this board many starting members have a lenght of 8", which they think is socially accepted big. ( In Europe the magic number = 20cm )
It has all to do with the "pornofication" that we see so many peni between 7" and 9"; that we think it is the norm. But it is not, it is porno, entertainment. Exceptional.
In a Durex survey - done in Leuven, some 3/4 years ago by some urologists, only 1 on - I don't remember but 700 or 1000 participants - had a member of 20.5cm ( injected with a chemical, that gives max erection )
20.5cm = not even 8.25".

So 8" you will see it in many claims, the same as the 6" girth. ( 8x6 )
But that is a huge dick.
Even women claim those measurements, as also they are infected by porn. But mostly they don't have a dildo with a working 8x6 dimension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MDM8

cock mcgnarly

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Posts
49
Media
11
Likes
8
Points
228
Location
Pac'in NW
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Its fun to see some more math involved here beyond the usual lenght x girth dimensions. So would you consider my measurement photos NBPL? Didn't even think about that don't feel i really have any "padding" that would make a difference.... so with a girth of 5.25in I'm right in the middle of the range for big it seems.
 

jd0198

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Posts
22
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
88
Gender
Male
It enters only for a fraction, as the fat pad acts like a buffer.
NBPL basically reflects what you can see.
Normally the difference is 0.5" or less. ( If your body fat(fat pad) is very high the difference may be more than 1inch.)
Some will find the BPL more accurate, because it is less depending on the changings in your fat composition.
But I can only verify pics, and see only the visable volume, the same as you will buy condoms for it.
If you have a 6.5" NBPL you are not going to buy extra large for a 8" BPL which is 1.5" hidden in fat.

no your wrong sorry to say, if your balls deep hammering a hole you will get every inch down to the bone in and that extra inch means everything where you dismiss that as a ploy, it's all about that
 

D_yabbadabbadont

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Posts
622
Media
0
Likes
16
Points
103
Sexuality
No Response
Girth is important in the making of a huge dick.


Agreed! Long and skinny doesn't equal big. On the bonepressed issue, sorry Dirk your wrong here. If we ALL measure as bonepressed as possible we are all starting at the same point. We are measuring dick size here NOT how much goes in a "the hole". Who says it's right that a skinny guy has the advantage over a fat guy when measuring, what if he looses weight?? Which brings up the bullshit of the ruler flat across the top. Again ok if you have a straight dick but doesn't take into account a curve.
So if we all measure bone pressed and WITH the curve we all give our best numbers. Yes the average goes up but I believe it's fairer.
Just my 2 cents.
 

dirkjesje

Loved Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Posts
1,407
Media
26
Likes
683
Points
258
Location
belgium
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Agreed! Long and skinny doesn't equal big. On the bonepressed issue, sorry Dirk your wrong here. If we ALL measure as bonepressed as possible we are all starting at the same point. We are measuring dick size here NOT how much goes in a "the hole". Who says it's right that a skinny guy has the advantage over a fat guy when measuring, what if he looses weight?? Which brings up the bullshit of the ruler flat across the top. Again ok if you have a straight dick but doesn't take into account a curve.
So if we all measure bone pressed and WITH the curve we all give our best numbers. Yes the average goes up but I believe it's fairer.
Just my 2 cents.
Well as I already mentioned it's probably the most accurate way of measuring ( certainly in PE as progress ).
But we see a dick - visual it's not bone pressed. In pics neither. And in hand -feeling just the same.
In penetration a fraction more, but as NBPL and BPL normallly differs only 0.5" or less it just less than 0.25".
Even that you are a heavy guy with an BMI 30 - only a fraction of your hidden cock will enter. ( fat pad +1.50" ) Well for sure 0.25" will enter, but not more than 0.75". How you can enter your dick, and not show it, it's having an egg in your pockets...