Difference Between Tight and Loose Circumcision?

Discussion in 'Sex With a Large Penis' started by RocketMan, Sep 15, 2007.

  1. RocketMan

    RocketMan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    121
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    17
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    San Francisco
    What is the difference between a "Loose Circumcision" and a "Tight Circumcision" ?

    I am circumcised and have always had a bunch of loose skin which often covers the lower portion of my glans when softer. When erect, I can still jerk off with the skin freely moving over the base of the glans. It is not uncomfortable and I need no lube. I know others who have absolutely no room for the shaft skin too move at all. Many who have seen my penis for the first time in person have commented on my being uncircumcised. Subsequently, I explain that I am not.

    'felipegarcia' told me in another thread (Have You Restored Your Foreskin?) that I am "not loosely circumcised." What am I?

    Have any other members experienced someone thinking they are uncircumcised when you are not?
     
  2. jacknthebstock

    jacknthebstock New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2006
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    1
    dude i saw your picks your definetly circumsized. No question about that. Your doctor was kind enough to leave you a nice amount of skin remaining to not be to raw. Well done. If you look ay my pics you can see the difference between your cut and my uncircumsized.
    I have complete coverage when erect and have to retract the skin for exosure. I can remain pulled back when hard if I want, but not all uncircumsized penises will remain exposed. There are others who's skin will not retract from thightness at all when erect, as well as those who's forskin over extends when the penis is soft.
    Hope that helps friend.
     
  3. B_dxjnorto

    B_dxjnorto New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2006
    Messages:
    7,319
    Likes Received:
    21
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Southwest U.S.
    About five years more of skin expanding foreskin restoration.

    Nice fatty beanstalk.
     
  4. RocketMan

    RocketMan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    121
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    17
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    San Francisco

    Thanks for setting the record straight, 'jaknthebstock.' Exactly my point ... my "doctor was kind enough to leave me a nice amount of skin remaining not to be raw." While I'd rather be uncircumcised, I'm thankful the doc left some loose skin :smile:
     
  5. chico8

    chico8 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    761
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Chico
    It's really all in the eye of the beholder. Many Americans would think you were intact, to many Europeans it's obvious that you were cut.

    Since I began restoration, I've often been taken for intact, even when my new skin only bunched up behind the glans. Tight circumcisions seem to have been the norm in the 60s.

    Personally, given the pics in your profile, I wouldn't say that you were intact. The skin is too thick and it doesn't fully cover the glans.
     
  6. jason_els

    jason_els <img border="0" src="/images/badges/gold_member.gi

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    Messages:
    10,576
    Likes Received:
    25
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Warwick, NY, USA
    Nice pics rocket!

    The best pic we could have to judge would be a HEAD-ON! (apply directly to the...:twak:) shot of you completely flaccid. It can be very difficult to tell if you have a chub or semi. How much inner skin do you have remaining?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted