Damn! I wish that I had discovered this thread earlier!
New England has many accents, including
working-class Boston, High-Yankee (
Kate Hepburn or
Bette Davis) and
DownEast (Maine). What I never understood is how
Rhode Island manages to sound very
New York when most of it's less than an hour's drive from Boston.
Connecticut, for whatever reason, has no accent of its own (aside from ten or so ancient Yankees who'll be dead very soon).
Thanks for the samples, Bbucko. I doubt that the way that Katharine Hepburn and Bette Davis spoke in their early movies reflected their own or anyone else's natural accent. (I know that your samples are from later, when their speech was less artificial, though it still shows traces of their older habits.) Until well into the 20th century, schools of drama in the US commonly taught an artificial "mid-Atlantic" or half-Anglicized accent. I think that's what you hear in those movies. Hepburn grew up in Hartford, Connecticut, where the accent is more like that of the Midwest than like that of Boston. Bette Davis was born in Lowell, but went to boarding school in western Mass., where the accent is like that of Connecticut.
You are quite right about the contrast between Boston and Rhode Island accents. Providence is phonologically much closer to New York than to Boston, geography to the contrary. But the title that the poster gave to that video on YouTube betrays a victory of preconception over observation. It says: "Delicious hawt cawffee." That would be a fair representation of how "hot coffee" would be pronounced in a Boston accent, namely with a slightly rounded back vowel in both words. (I'm using the technical terms of phonetics: "back" indicates the place of the highest point of the tongue; "rounded" describes the position of the lips.) But the girl in the video plainly says "haht cawfee," with an unrounded vowel in the first syllable and a fairly strongly rounded vowel in the second. This is exactly the New York pattern.
It makes me want to scream when I see the Boston pronunciation of "Boston" represented as "Baahstin." No one with a Boston accent would ever pronounce the name of the city that way. If a Bostonian ever said "Baahstin," he or she would have to be talking about a place called
Barston. "Boston" has the same vowel in the first syllable as words like "boss," "coffee," "law," etc. -- "aw," not the "ah" of "pahk ya cah."
If you visit Boston, though, unless you hang out with working-class people, you will probably be disappointed at how rarely you hear a strong local accent. Most of the locals sound about as Bostonian as Matt Damon or Ben Affleck, who only put on a local accent when a role requires it (and who tend to miss the mark when they do so).
There is, however, one mark by which you can recognize Bostonians even when their accents are otherwise without local characteristics, namely the way in which they pronounce the diphthong "ow" before an unvoiced consonant, as in words like "out" and "about." They shorten the diphthong almost exactly as Canadians do, so that it sounds like "oat" and "a boat" -- or, in some cases, like "aht" and "abaht." You can hear this in the speech of Mr. Camuso in the YouTube video ("It's throughoat the community").
I'm from Rhode Island and I don't recall ever hearing anyone sounding like they're from New York fer sure. A lighter Boston accent depending on where in R.I. Some are heavy.
To me my cousins in Ct. had accents distinct from R.I.
I don't doubt it. To you, the difference between Rhode Island and New York accents is obvious. To someone from outside the Northeast, New York, Boston, and Providence accents are all going to sound pretty similar, because they sound more like each other than they sound like the accents that prevail in the rest of the country -- outside of New Orleans, of course, where the people sound like a bunch of New Yorkers pretending to be Southerners!
Question for the Americans: Can you guys tell the difference between British accents at all? Irish is pretty distinct, and cockney - but Welsh, Scottish, Liverpudlian, Geordie (Newcastle) , Brummy (Brimingham) and Mancunian all sound pretty different too.
I doubt that you will find many Americans who would even be able to hear the differences among the English accents that you list if they heard them one after the other, much less be able to attribute them correctly. Welsh and Scottish accents would be another matter: I think many if not most Americans would recognize a Scottish accent, and while they may not recognize a Welsh accent, they would be able to tell that it was something different from the others.
I am a long-time student of phonetics and dialects, and the best that I could do with unidentified samples of Newcastle, Birmingham, Liverpool, and Manchester speech would be to recognize that this one is different from that one and to make some guesses about where they came from. If the test were in multiple-choice format, I might do pretty well; otherwise, not.
I guess the Pacific North West doesn't have an 'accent' as far as America is concerned.
That is certainly true in the Seattle area, where I grew up. If there is anything that can be said to differentiate the local "accent" from other American accents, it is that it is utterly devoid of regional distinction.
On the other hand, if you go to the less populous parts of the state, you are much more likely to hear "country"-sounding accents. I think this reflects the extent of immigration to those areas from the Midwest and the South during the Great Depression.