Digital T.V.?? Er...Not Yet!

heyman111

Just Browsing
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Posts
4
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
146
I swear. It's now to the point where it is annoying. Just change it already - the sooner they change it, the quicker the problems are over.
 

Deno

Cherished Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Posts
4,630
Media
1
Likes
439
Points
303
Sexuality
No Response
:blindfold:Oh no! There switching to digital....:shock:

Maybe the 5 million households or whatever don't even watch tv. I wonder how they even know these numbers!
 

b.c.

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Posts
20,540
Media
0
Likes
21,784
Points
468
Location
at home
Verification
View
Gender
Male
The problem i have with it is the notion that a vast majority of viewers who are ready for the conversion are waiting around for a small number of those who a) probably could've gotten the means to receive the signals by now but just haven't bothered to b) holdouts who don't plan on making the switch, or c) those who think along the lines of "i can live in a flood zone and not need flood insurance" and "ahh...my t.v. will still work without it."

Some just have to take the plunge, and some have to be forced to. The longer the conversion is held up and delayed, the less incentive broadcasters, cable companies, etc. have to deliver higher grade signals and improve services.
 

SpeedoMike

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Posts
2,793
Media
0
Likes
50
Points
123
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
last fall the FCC had an early conversion to digital in Wilmington (NC?). It was an eye opener to everyone. A large number of "digital-ready" viewers could not receive the signals and therefore no longer received TV. Google it if you want to know more about the conversion and its problems.