- Joined
- May 1, 2018
- Posts
- 519
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 2,669
- Points
- 313
- Location
- London (Greater London, England)
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Male
It annoys me when me when a 19 year old celebrity has a kid and suddenly “wow, he’s such a hot DILF” - no he isn’t, he’s 19.
DILF has never meant “someone who has demonstrated functional sperm”. It’s a concept. Older man, rugged, possibly greying, maybe few wrinkles.
In the same way a hot 45 year old can be described as one without checking to see if he’s sired an heir. You’re not not a DILF because your fertility is yet proven
The misuse of this term whereby anyone who has a child can be defined as a DILF, needs correcting. Yes I know what the acronym stands for, but ‘twink that impregnated someone’ is still a twink, not a DILF. Stop this nonsense.
DILF has never meant “someone who has demonstrated functional sperm”. It’s a concept. Older man, rugged, possibly greying, maybe few wrinkles.
In the same way a hot 45 year old can be described as one without checking to see if he’s sired an heir. You’re not not a DILF because your fertility is yet proven
The misuse of this term whereby anyone who has a child can be defined as a DILF, needs correcting. Yes I know what the acronym stands for, but ‘twink that impregnated someone’ is still a twink, not a DILF. Stop this nonsense.