DILF misuse

oscar thomas

Superior Member
Joined
May 1, 2018
Posts
519
Media
0
Likes
2,669
Points
313
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
It annoys me when me when a 19 year old celebrity has a kid and suddenly “wow, he’s such a hot DILF” - no he isn’t, he’s 19.

DILF has never meant “someone who has demonstrated functional sperm”. It’s a concept. Older man, rugged, possibly greying, maybe few wrinkles.

In the same way a hot 45 year old can be described as one without checking to see if he’s sired an heir. You’re not not a DILF because your fertility is yet proven

The misuse of this term whereby anyone who has a child can be defined as a DILF, needs correcting. Yes I know what the acronym stands for, but ‘twink that impregnated someone’ is still a twink, not a DILF. Stop this nonsense.
 
It annoys me when me when a 19 year old celebrity has a kid and suddenly “wow, he’s such a hot DILF” - no he isn’t, he’s 19.

DILF has never meant “someone who has demonstrated functional sperm”. It’s a concept. Older man, rugged, possibly greying, maybe few wrinkles.

In the same way a hot 45 year old can be described as one without checking to see if he’s sired an heir. You’re not not a DILF because your fertility is yet proven

The misuse of this term whereby anyone who has a child can be defined as a DILF, needs correcting. Yes I know what the acronym stands for, but ‘twink that impregnated someone’ is still a twink, not a DILF. Stop this nonsense.
IMG_0666.gif
IMG_0667.gif